Page 1 of 2
Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 10:00
by johnswan1
Anybody know what the reasoning is behind this? I thought it was based on number of posts but I saw somebody with far more than me being classified as a Flyweight while I show up as Welter.
*Note this is the division showing below every poster name in left column*
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 10:01
by watsupdoc87
based on when you joined

Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 10:03
by johnswan1
Nope, doesn't seem to be. Have a look at any thread, older joining date does not equate to a higher division weight.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 10:04
by johnty1888
I'm classed as a middleweight, I look on the forum everyday but I hardly post anything nowadays.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 10:05
by Boxerbeetle
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 10:06
by Ian1973
I'm a light flyweight. Obviously no one has seen my belly
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 10:33
by rpms
Posted just to see what division I`m in ..
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 11:00
by Dixonian
It would make more sense if based on number of posts. But then again, you generally put on weight with age. So maybe they're right.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 11:31
by olij999
Couple of stone to go if I'm going to make super-welterweight. (And a shame to see Boxrec following everyone else on that terminology - I'd far prefer to be a light-middleweight.)
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 11:37
by Nightmare Roy
Penis size I believe, I feel aggrieved, It was chilly when I measured up.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 11:57
by J
only time I am likely to make welterweight anytime soon
though im down to 13 stone 7 form 15 3 fat fecker I was.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 12:00
by jamesmcdonnell
J wrote:only time I am likely to make welterweight anytime soon
though im down to 13 stone 7 form 15 3 fat fecker I was.
Blimey - did you lose a leg in a freak accident?
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 12:40
by palooka
Nightmare Roy wrote:Penis size I believe, I feel aggrieved, It was chilly when I measured up.
Mines an accurate description
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 05 Jan 2016, 13:02
by Nightmare Roy
palooka wrote:Nightmare Roy wrote:Penis size I believe, I feel aggrieved, It was chilly when I measured up.
Mines an accurate description
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
It's not the size of the prize, it's the motion in the ocean.

Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 08:08
by CharlesListon
fornicate me ....I'd be light-mini-minimum weight if it was done on that!
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 08:22
by Boxing Prospect
CharlesListon wrote:eff me ....I'd be light-mini-minimum weight if it was done on that!
Another way to say Aromweight?...for what it's worth they don't have willies >_>
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 08:31
by CharlesListon
Is there one lighter?
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 08:49
by Boxing Prospect
In the ams there's pinwwight I guess
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 08:53
by J
jamesmcdonnell wrote:J wrote:only time I am likely to make welterweight anytime soon
though im down to 13 stone 7 form 15 3 fat fecker I was.
Blimey - did you lose a leg in a freak accident?
lol no mate type 2 diabetes.
no big deal just made me change my lifestyle, well that the mrs liking the booze too much made me cut back too.
All good mate, you know me cant keep a good dog down

Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 13:09
by jamesmcdonnell
J wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:J wrote:only time I am likely to make welterweight anytime soon
though im down to 13 stone 7 form 15 3 fat fecker I was.
Blimey - did you lose a leg in a freak accident?
lol no mate type 2 diabetes.
no big deal just made me change my lifestyle, well that the mrs liking the booze too much made me cut back too.
All good mate, you know me cant keep a good dog down

Whoops sorry mate - didn't realise it was that serious! You're not completely Tee-total are you, I couldn't handle that thought.
Been on a bit of a health kick myself lately. Cut the old booze down a fair bit.
We'll have to do this much meetup one of these days, I'm in the Netherlands in a couple of weeks, but only on a 12 hour layover on the way to Rio so won't have time to do a trip to Rotterdam I don't think.
Hope all is good with you.
What is all this 'weight' shite on my threads?
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 15:16
by Mimmy
How come I now have a weight catagory under my name. Im suddenly a lightweight. I'm 5 foot 8 and weigh 13 and half stone?
Re: What is all this 'weight' shite on my threads?
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 15:19
by afcmarshall
its worked out from when you joined
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 17:56
by Tuan_Jim
That can't be right. Riddick Blowe dates back to 2002, right when you had to first register to post, and yet he's still only a super middle? In 2001 I recall you could choose to sign in or not, and simply post as a guest, and I'm not sure the forum even existed in 2000.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 18:00
by Yes We Can
Heavyweight lurkers all over the place are tempted to post now!
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 18:03
by Tuan_Jim
Maybe I could exhume one. . . . My posts deserve far more respect than they are currently accorded!