BoxRec

1.Gennady Golovkin
2.Saul Alvarez
3.Amir Khan
4.Terence Crawford
5.Timothy Bradley
6.Manny Pacquiao
7.Keith Thurman
8.Danny Garcia
9.Daniel Jacobs
10.Guillermo Rigondeaux
11.Viktor Postol
12.Erislandy Lara
13.Miguel Cotto
14.Errol Spence JR
15.Roy Jones in his prime

psychod1986 wrote:1.Gennady Golovkin
2.Andre Ward
3.Amir Khan
4.Terence Crawford
5.Timothy Bradley
6.Manny Pacquiao
7.Keith Thurman
8.Danny Garcia
9.Daniel Jacobs
10.Guillermo Rigondeaux
11.Viktor Postol
12.Erislandy Lara
13.Miguel Cotto

how can you have light heavy weight ward on the list you might as well put tyson fury on it

Deontay Wilder

Absolutely no doubt in my mind that Golovkin would brutalize Floyd as long as the fight would be at no lower than 154. Other than Golovkin I see no one at 160 and lower who could beat Floyd.

stevedoc wrote:

psychod1986 wrote:1.Gennady Golovkin
2.Andre Ward
3.Amir Khan
4.Terence Crawford
5.Timothy Bradley
6.Manny Pacquiao
7.Keith Thurman
8.Danny Garcia
9.Daniel Jacobs
10.Guillermo Rigondeaux
11.Viktor Postol
12.Erislandy Lara
13.Miguel Cotto

how can you have light heavy weight ward on the list you might as well put tyson fury on it

I replace him,thanks for correcting me buddy

psychod1986 wrote:

stevedoc wrote:

psychod1986 wrote:1.Gennady Golovkin
2.Andre Ward
3.Amir Khan
4.Terence Crawford
5.Timothy Bradley
6.Manny Pacquiao
7.Keith Thurman
8.Danny Garcia
9.Daniel Jacobs
10.Guillermo Rigondeaux
11.Viktor Postol
12.Erislandy Lara
13.Miguel Cotto

how can you have light heavy weight ward on the list you might as well put tyson fury on it

I replace him,thanks for correcting me buddy

No problems, I didn't mean to be a dick about it but some times guys make up new account here and type stuff normally about Floyd to start an argument,you don't seem like that so peace and love brother

at 159: ggg
at 154: lara
ar 147: nobody
at 140: nobody

i would favour floyd against crawford & spence.
lara has to much reach, is equaly athletic as floyd, has equaly good footspeed. but has an advantage on power and overall size, lara ud's him.
ggg is way too big for floyd, that wouldnt end well, tko mid rounds.

Baby Face Finster wrote:Absolutely no doubt in my mind that Golovkin would brutalize Floyd as long as the fight would be at no lower than 154. Other than Golovkin I see no one at 160 and lower who could beat Floyd.

Lara?

Golovkin would.

No-one else.

Chepppaaa wrote:

Baby Face Finster wrote:Absolutely no doubt in my mind that Golovkin would brutalize Floyd as long as the fight would be at no lower than 154. Other than Golovkin I see no one at 160 and lower who could beat Floyd.

Lara?

For a guy who failed to win 4 of his first 26 pro fights, Lara is probably the most overrated fighter of the past couple of decades, second only to Miguel Cotto. For fans of Lara, what's his best win, Trout? There is nobody else on his record who he's beaten that is even remotely decent.

Active fighters today who might could've beaten anyone?

All, anyone is capable of getting caught and KO'd, end of story

omg, i am thankful we didn't have to sit through floyd v lara or rigondeaux.

johnswan1 wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

Baby Face Finster wrote:Absolutely no doubt in my mind that Golovkin would brutalize Floyd as long as the fight would be at no lower than 154. Other than Golovkin I see no one at 160 and lower who could beat Floyd.

Lara?

For a guy who failed to win 4 of his first 26 pro fights, Lara is probably the most overrated fighter of the past couple of decades, second only to Miguel Cotto. For fans of Lara, what's his best win, Trout? There is nobody else on his record who he's beaten that is even remotely decent.

newbie

sucracristo wrote:omg, i am thankful we didn't have to sit through floyd v lara or rigondeaux.

I'd rather much either of those than a fight like Klits vs John Huggaboxer Ruiz, lol

A fight like that would be like paint watching itself dry

johnswan1 wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

Baby Face Finster wrote:Absolutely no doubt in my mind that Golovkin would brutalize Floyd as long as the fight would be at no lower than 154. Other than Golovkin I see no one at 160 and lower who could beat Floyd.

Lara?

For a guy who failed to win 4 of his first 26 pro fights, Lara is probably the most overrated fighter of the past couple of decades, second only to Miguel Cotto. For fans of Lara, what's his best win, Trout? There is nobody else on his record who he's beaten that is even remotely decent.

Well to be truthful in Lara's defense, he actually won that fight vs Paul Williams but they stole it from him.

Chepppaaa wrote:

johnswan1 wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

Lara?

For a guy who failed to win 4 of his first 26 pro fights, Lara is probably the most overrated fighter of the past couple of decades, second only to Miguel Cotto. For fans of Lara, what's his best win, Trout? There is nobody else on his record who he's beaten that is even remotely decent.

newbie

Says the Flyweight.