BoxRec

I know journalism is at an all time low, but in an article with Mike Tyson in today's paper they claim Fury said that all gays should be "shot dead". Surely he could sue if he's been misquoted, I certainly don't remember him ever saying anything like that

Apparently it's from his twitter account in 2012.

"dont like gays shoul all b shot dead"

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/bac ... 61041.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/24474326

They love a good dig for a story! Wasn't this around the time when it was deemed PA Ward was updating his account without his knowledge.

The sun barely qualifies as a newspaper, I'm surprised people even read it any more.

Another misleading thread title... disgraceful

In an interview with Mike Tyson?.....do you mean Tyson F?

magwitch wrote:In an interview with Mike Tyson?.....do you mean Tyson F?

No, they were interviewing Mike Tyson and asked his opinion of fury

Stevieb8006 wrote:

magwitch wrote:In an interview with Mike Tyson?.....do you mean Tyson F?

No, they were interviewing Mike Tyson and asked his opinion of fury

Gotcha

Mike Tyson "I am proud he carries my name. He is the man. End of".

Stevieb8006 wrote:

magwitch wrote:In an interview with Mike Tyson?.....do you mean Tyson F?

No, they were interviewing Mike Tyson and asked his opinion of fury

Has anyone seen a film clip of this Mike Tyson interview, i'm curious as to what he was really getting at when he was saying we are all laughing at Fury, but he thinks he's the best boxer since himself and loves the fact he has his name.

Is Mike Tyson suggesting we are all laughing at Fury because he is a bit gangly and not the most coordinated of boxers, he did punch himself in the face remember. Or, is he referring to his antics and controversial comments?

Dont know why this rag gets air time

Back in my student days and money was used for alcohol The Sun was the favourite rag to use as bog roll. Simply because the print didn't come off on your arse like the Daily Mirror's or Star's would. Now that I can afford bog roll I have no need to buy The Sun.

chad wrote:Another misleading thread title... disgraceful

Yep - sounds like the OP has misquoted the Sun .... disgraceful.

I wonder if he thinks that The Sun should be allowed to sue him for this misquote?

More truth in the Beano than that rag, wouldnt wipe my arse on it!!

When will people learn Dont buy the SUN

Floatlikeabutterfly wrote:More truth in the Beano than that rag, wouldnt wipe my arse on it!!

When will people learn Dont buy the SUN

Any newspaper to be fair there all a pile of drivel.

Rexob wrote:

Floatlikeabutterfly wrote:More truth in the Beano than that rag, wouldnt wipe my arse on it!!

When will people learn Dont buy the SUN

Any newspaper to be fair there all a pile of drivel.

Other newspapers didn't tell blatant lies about the death of 96 innocent football fans for 30 years...

MarkMcBurney wrote:

Rexob wrote:

Floatlikeabutterfly wrote:More truth in the Beano than that rag, wouldnt wipe my arse on it!!

When will people learn Dont buy the SUN

Any newspaper to be fair there all a pile of drivel.

Other newspapers didn't tell blatant lies about the death of 96 innocent football fans for 30 years...

This

freddydoesdallas wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:

Rexob wrote:

Any newspaper to be fair there all a pile of drivel.

Other newspapers didn't tell blatant lies about the death of 96 innocent football fans for 30 years...

This

How is they are able to get away with knowingly telling falsehoods without any fear of prosecution?

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

freddydoesdallas wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote: Other newspapers didn't tell blatant lies about the death of 96 innocent football fans for 30 years...

This

How is they are able to get away with knowingly telling falsehoods without any fear of prosecution?

Did you not follow the Leveson enquiry?

Some retards believe anything written in a paper. I know of Man Utd fans who believed every word The Scum said about Hillsborough until proven wrong.

MarkMcBurney wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

freddydoesdallas wrote:
This

How is they are able to get away with knowingly telling falsehoods without any fear of prosecution?

Did you not follow the Leveson enquiry?

Some retards believe anything written in a paper. I know of Man Utd fans who believed every word The Scum said about Hillsborough until proven wrong.

I must say I didn't.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
How is they are able to get away with knowingly telling falsehoods without any fear of prosecution?

Did you not follow the Leveson enquiry?

Some retards believe anything written in a paper. I know of Man Utd fans who believed every word The Scum said about Hillsborough until proven wrong.

I must say I didn't.

Hang on, aren't they still awaiting the full report.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote: Did you not follow the Leveson enquiry?

Some retards believe anything written in a paper. I know of Man Utd fans who believed every word The Scum said about Hillsborough until proven wrong.

I must say I didn't.

Hang on, aren't they still awaiting the full report.

Nope, published several years ago: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... he-report/

The second part of the report has been put back until all criminal proceedings resulting from it have ceased, however this was merely about the implementation of changes following the report.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
How is they are able to get away with knowingly telling falsehoods without any fear of prosecution?

What prosecutions could they face? The people who died at hillsborough obviously can't make the complaints so that's the libel out of the way. I'm pretty sure that you have to prove that a publication printing falsehoods is absolutely wrong which can be an expensive thing to do, especially for working class people in the 80s.

Who knows what might be possible once everything gets out in the open and everything is finalised.

MarkMcBurney wrote:

Rexob wrote:

Floatlikeabutterfly wrote:More truth in the Beano than that rag, wouldnt wipe my arse on it!!

When will people learn Dont buy the SUN

Any newspaper to be fair there all a pile of drivel.

Other newspapers didn't tell blatant lies about the death of 96 innocent football fans for 30 years...

X2

MarkMcBurney wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
I must say I didn't.

Hang on, aren't they still awaiting the full report.

Nope, published several years ago: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... he-report/

The second part of the report has been put back until all criminal proceedings resulting from it have ceased, however this was merely about the implementation of changes following the report.

Sorry, confusing it with the Chilcott enquiry.