BoxRec

An rightly so

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/4078 ... r-for-2015

well done Tyson

well deserved

Too right! Nice one Tyson

Well done Better front cover than last months with a fornicating female MMA fighter on the front of it

What a joke...ring magazine fighter of the year? He hardly threw a punch in germany ffs,there wer better fighters than him in the effin world last year

Postol golovkin alvarez frampton degale all put up better fights than fury

thechump wrote:What a joke...ring magazine fighter of the year? He hardly threw a punch in germany ffs,there wer better fighters than him in the effin world last year

I assume the ones who agree with this are doing so purely out of patriotism?

Whilst beating Vlad was certainly a great achievement he did very little & really only won because Vlad did even less.

Far better boxers did far more & managed to do it in exciting fights. Calling him the fighter of the year is a joke.

moogie101 wrote:I assume the ones who agree with this are doing so purely out of patriotism?

Whilst beating Vlad was certainly a great achievement he did very little & really only won because Vlad did even less.

Far better boxers did far more & managed to do it in exciting fights. Calling him the fighter of the year is a joke.

A fvckin men,this is a joke no wonder boxing is losing its appeal to the general public. I cant believe ppl think he was the ring magazine fighter of the year,id love to hear their reason as to why he is

moogie101 wrote:I assume the ones who agree with this are doing so purely out of patriotism?

No.

moogie101 wrote:Whilst beating Vlad was certainly a great achievement he did very little & really only won because Vlad did even less.

He put Wlad in his box, that is not doing "very little".

moogie101 wrote:Far better boxers did far more & managed to do it in exciting fights. Calling him the fighter of the year is a joke.

Who did "far more" than Tyson Fury this year? Nobody.

Horse wrote:

moogie101 wrote:I assume the ones who agree with this are doing so purely out of patriotism?

No.

moogie101 wrote:Whilst beating Vlad was certainly a great achievement he did very little & really only won because Vlad did even less.

He put Wlad in his box, that is not doing "very little".

moogie101 wrote:Far better boxers did far more & managed to do it in exciting fights. Calling him the fighter of the year is a joke.

Who did "far more" than Tyson Fury this year? Nobody.

Can u talk with ur mouth full of fury's c0ck horse? He isnt fighter of the year end of effin story

Well deserved well done Tyson great achievement.

thechump wrote:

moogie101 wrote:I assume the ones who agree with this are doing so purely out of patriotism?

Whilst beating Vlad was certainly a great achievement he did very little & really only won because Vlad did even less.

Far better boxers did far more & managed to do it in exciting fights. Calling him the fighter of the year is a joke.

A fvckin men,this is a joke no wonder boxing is losing its appeal to the general public. I cant believe ppl think he was the ring magazine fighter of the year,id love to hear their reason as to why he is

cos he danced and fiddled his way to the heavyweight championship of the world against somebody that was scared to throw a punch , only thing is lots tried and many failed before this so fair play on the win I say, but Ring fighter of the year not remotely near for me .

He won the greatest prize in sport! not the best fight in history but the best achievement by far last year!

rd350lc wrote:cos he danced and fiddled his way to the heavyweight championship of the world against somebody that was scared to throw a punch , only thing is lots tried and many failed before this so fair play on the win I say, but Ring fighter of the year not remotely near for me .

Not remotely near?

How many other contenders were there? Not many.

thechump wrote:Postol golovkin alvarez frampton degale all put up better fights than fury

a few for starters

cant believe ppl actually think he is fighter of 2015. He said himself if he cant beat a guy who is nearly 40 he might aswell hang his gloves up. So people dont think degale's two fight against dirrell and bute,both away from home,wasnt better than fury vs vlad? Or framptons fight in the states? Or postol's stoppage of mattyse wasnt a better performance? Alvarez vs cotto and kirkland? Golovkin vs murray,monroe and lemeiux? All these fighters are leagues above fury's snore fest in germany

rd350lc wrote:a few for starters

Postol? DeGale? Bloody Frampton?

Pitiful.

Rexob wrote:He won the greatest prize in sport! not the best fight in history but the best achievement by far last year!

Against a statue? Check the fighters iv listed and thats just a few off the top of my head,its fighter of 2015 not fighter who wins the heavyweight title off the most boring heavyweight in history

Horse wrote:

rd350lc wrote:a few for starters

Postol? DeGale? Bloody Frampton?

Pitiful.

Hahahahahaha horse u forgot ur last name son,sh1t!!

thechump wrote:

Rexob wrote:He won the greatest prize in sport! not the best fight in history but the best achievement by far last year!

Against a statue? Check the fighters iv listed and thats just a few off the top of my head,its fighter of 2015 not fighter who wins the heavyweight title off the most boring heavyweight in history

That nobody could beat.

He shook up the HW division and made it interesting again (which boxing needs), and did what nobody else had managed for more than 10 years.

Fair play to him.

Joe Gallagher won trainer of the year as well, and Anthony Crolla was named "most inspirational". Decent haul for the Brits.

Obviously there is some c0ck riders on here that dont know the difference between FIGHTER of the year and someone just beating somebody who previous fighters were too small and were beaten before they got to the ring. Iv said my bit on it,as u can see i dont agree with it he wasnt fighter of the year and its no secret the owner of ring magazine,mr de la hoya doesnt like wlad so this is just the icing on the cake for oscar

Horse wrote:

rd350lc wrote:a few for starters

Postol? DeGale? Bloody Frampton?

Pitiful.

I thought boxing was meant to be entertaining, for me these fighters were in entertaining fights against good opposition.

I personally did not enjoy the Fury / Klit fight whatsoever and didn't find it entertaining.

Golovkin is the fighter of the year

We'll done Tyson!