Wilder says he won't go to Russia to fight Povetkin
Posted: 17 Jan 2016, 17:28
Don't have any issue with Alexander going to the U.S to defuse the bomber.
He'd fight Fury anywhere. Besides, Fury is the lineal champ... or closest thing to one. Povetkin is a contender.punchoutsb wrote:But just last night Wilder claimed he'd fight anywhere. Could that have been hyperbole?
![]()
The guy with the money dictates where the fight is. This will come down to who is wealthier, Povetkins manager or Al Haymon.
Suggesting that Szpilka was about to be robbed on the cards is a bridge too far. Neither fighter had established anything close to dominance before the final punch.Andrew Kearney wrote:Wilder may not have a choice, depending on how negotiations go.
Povetkin and his team have money behind them, and in the past they have even outbid K2 promotions, in order to stage the Povetkin-Klitschko fight in Moscow. They had a 23$ Million USD bid as I recall. So they have money to throw around. I don't know how much they would be willing to bid on this fight, probably considerably less because it is not close to as big as the Klitschko-Povetkin fight was.
But, if it goes to a purse bid, and Povetkin's team wins and chooses to fight in Russia, Wilder has no choice. Well, the only choices he has is to
A) Fight in Russia
or B) Drop the belt and lose his title.
Povetkin's team has said they are open to the idea of fighting in USA, but in all honesty if you watched the scoring from last night, that does not seem like a good idea as the officiating will likely favour Wilder. Most fans had the fight even or Szpilka winning, but the judges and media all had Wilder ahead.
If Povetkin does fight Wilder in USA, he needs to demand 3 non-American judges and a non-American ref. Because as we just saw last night, Szpilka was on his way to being robbed. The majority of fans in the internet rbr's (even here at boxrec) at Szpilka ahead, but the judges had a completely different scoreline.
Povetkin would be wise to force bid and take the fight to Russia.
He'd fight Fury anywhere...in Alabama. Young Fury that is. Wilder has yet to prove he'll fight anywhere.Impractical Poster wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere. Besides, Fury is the lineal champ... or closest thing to one. Povetkin is a contender.punchoutsb wrote:But just last night Wilder claimed he'd fight anywhere. Could that have been hyperbole?
![]()
The guy with the money dictates where the fight is. This will come down to who is wealthier, Povetkins manager or Al Haymon.
punchoutsb wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere...in Alabama. Young Fury that is. Wilder has yet to prove he'll fight anywhere.
After last night, if I was part of Team Wilder, I would target the winner of Fury v WKlit II.Impractical Poster wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere. Besides, Fury is the lineal champ... or closest thing to one. Povetkin is a contender.punchoutsb wrote:But just last night Wilder claimed he'd fight anywhere. Could that have been hyperbole?
![]()
The guy with the money dictates where the fight is. This will come down to who is wealthier, Povetkins manager or Al Haymon.
I hear ya.punchoutsb wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere...in Alabama. Young Fury that is. Wilder has yet to prove he'll fight anywhere.Impractical Poster wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere. Besides, Fury is the lineal champ... or closest thing to one. Povetkin is a contender.punchoutsb wrote:But just last night Wilder claimed he'd fight anywhere. Could that have been hyperbole?
![]()
The guy with the money dictates where the fight is. This will come down to who is wealthier, Povetkins manager or Al Haymon.
I'm tired of the talk from everyone included. I want to see Fury/Klitschko II, Wilder/Povetkin, and then the winners. I couldn't care less where, as long as the judges are neutral.
He was in hostile territory last night.punchoutsb wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere...in Alabama. Young Fury that is. Wilder has yet to prove he'll fight anywhere.Impractical Poster wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere. Besides, Fury is the lineal champ... or closest thing to one. Povetkin is a contender.punchoutsb wrote:But just last night Wilder claimed he'd fight anywhere. Could that have been hyperbole?
![]()
The guy with the money dictates where the fight is. This will come down to who is wealthier, Povetkins manager or Al Haymon.
I'm tired of the talk from everyone included. I want to see Fury/Klitschko II, Wilder/Povetkin, and then the winners. I couldn't care less where, as long as the judges are neutral.
Sounds good to me.Tanzio wrote:After last night, if I was part of Team Wilder, I would target the winner of Fury v WKlit II.Impractical Poster wrote:He'd fight Fury anywhere. Besides, Fury is the lineal champ... or closest thing to one. Povetkin is a contender.punchoutsb wrote:But just last night Wilder claimed he'd fight anywhere. Could that have been hyperbole?
![]()
The guy with the money dictates where the fight is. This will come down to who is wealthier, Povetkins manager or Al Haymon.
I actually like both Fury and Wilder. I would enjoy the run up to the fight almost as much as the fight itself, no matter which way it went.Impractical Poster wrote:Sounds good to me.Tanzio wrote:After last night, if I was part of Team Wilder, I would target the winner of Fury v WKlit II.Impractical Poster wrote: He'd fight Fury anywhere. Besides, Fury is the lineal champ... or closest thing to one. Povetkin is a contender.
I think Wilder would have success against Wlad. But, Fury would be a tough outing for him. I like Wilder and the spirit he brings. I'd be rooting for him big time. But, as ugly as Fury is, he has shown that he can utilize an effective jab along with effective movement. Nothing pretty, just effective.
I also think Wilder's jab is extremely effective, when he's using it. But, I believe along with a height advantage, Fury would be enjoying a reach advantage as well... I may be wrong on that tho.
He was fighting on an Al Haymon card against tough journeyman. The Polish contingent was loud, but that's not comparable in any way to truly hostile territory against a world class opponent.Tanzio wrote:He was in hostile territory last night.
I agree that Povetkin should be next, but I think they may maneuver for a shot at the Fury v WKlit winner.
I agree.punchoutsb wrote:He was fighting on an Al Haymon card against tough journeyman. The Polish contingent was loud, but that's not comparable in any way to truly hostile territory against a world class opponent.Tanzio wrote:He was in hostile territory last night.
I agree that Povetkin should be next, but I think they may maneuver for a shot at the Fury v WKlit winner.
Wilder is exciting. Very exciting due to his power and his flaws. It's time to see what he's really got. If he really believes he's the best, he'll fight Povetkin wherever the match lands. Of course dodging Povetkin for Wlad/Fury II winner is acceptable, but he shouldn't be allowed to defend his title against anyone but Alexander.
Wilder has already fought in the UK.punchoutsb wrote:
He'd fight Fury anywhere...in Alabama. Young Fury that is. Wilder has yet to prove he'll fight anywhere.
He fought in the USA, just like 31 of his other fights.Tanzio wrote: He was in hostile territory last night.
Against poor old Audrey Harrison.ttornado wrote:Wilder has already fought in the UK.
Ah yes, when Wilder's 'windmill' technique was on full displayFreedom2013 wrote:Against poor old Audrey Harrison.ttornado wrote:Wilder has already fought in the UK.