Page 1 of 1
2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 11:03
by Cholo_cws
I'd suggest that this reflects a little of what boxing delivers today. Obviously a 'top two' is debatable and subjective and also in some cases their meeting is not really warranted (if they'd recently fought each other recently, prior to 2015.) Still, there are 17 weight divisions.
Mayweather-Pacman for starters. Any others?
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 11:42
by cocobongo
Wlad & Fury
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 12:29
by Boxing Prospect
Maybe not ot top 2 but Moreno Vs Yamanaka can't have been far off
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 14:07
by Andrew
Boxing Prospect wrote:Maybe not ot top 2 but Moreno Vs Yamanaka can't have been far off
Yeah wouldn't dispute this.
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 16:47
by dr_devious
Kovalev v Stevenson
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 16:48
by crusader
dr_devious wrote:Kovalev v Stevenson
I wish
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 16:53
by dr_devious
Me too
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 16:58
by davie
There won't be any chance of a cruiser weight bout being metioned. I don't think there's been a unification since Haye vs Maccarinelli
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 17:15
by Boxing Prospect
davie wrote:There won't be any chance of a cruiser weight bout being metioned. I don't think there's been a unification since Haye vs Maccarinelli
It's strange how many Top 10 Vs Top 10 bouts the division seems to give us, even if unification seems to be on no ones mind. Very odd. and brilliant, division.
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 24 Jan 2016, 11:42
by Cholo_cws
cocobongo wrote:Wlad & Fury
I don't think many would have had Tyson rated above Povetkin last year prior to Wlad-Fury. Their rematch is the heavyweight's top two for 2016 though.
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 24 Jan 2016, 11:43
by Cholo_cws
Boxing Prospect wrote:davie wrote:There won't be any chance of a cruiser weight bout being metioned. I don't think there's been a unification since Haye vs Maccarinelli
It's strange how many Top 10 Vs Top 10 bouts the division seems to give us, even if unification seems to be on no ones mind. Very odd. and brilliant, division.
Middleweight division did also - alas obviously not Cotto-Golovkin though.
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 25 Jan 2016, 14:16
by PredatorHayds
I'm a sad so and so who keeps rankings. The highest ranked I had facing in 2015 were
1. Wlad 3. Fury
1. Kovalev 3. Pascal
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
1. Golovkin 6. Lemieux
2. Cotto 1Lm. Canelo
1. Floyd 2. Pacman
1. Garcia 4. Peterson
2. Matthysse 4. Postol
3. Shafikov 5lww. Barthélemy
3. Miura 5. Vargas
2. Frampton 5. Avalos
4. Quigg 2bw. Martinez
4. Mcdonnell 5. Kameda
1. Gonzalez 6. Sosa
1. Gonzalez 6. Viloria
3. Ioka 5. Reveco
I only keep rankings down to flyweight.
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 25 Jan 2016, 15:00
by davie
Surprised Kameda was 5, is that for their first or second bout.
Certainly though one of the two bouts would have seen a collective higher rating than 4 & 5
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
That's a terrible indictment against the modern super-middleweight division
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Posted: 26 Jan 2016, 09:40
by PredatorHayds
davie wrote:Surprised Kameda was 5, is that for their first or second bout.
Certainly though one of the two bouts would have seen a collective higher rating than 4 & 5
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
That's a terrible indictment against the modern super-middleweight division
Both in the top 10 was the Kameda rematch.
Stieglitz at 4 is shocking.
Based on the rankings at the time of the fights Mcdonnell and Ioka are the only fighters with 2 top 5 wins and they both won against the odds and triumphed again in the rematch.
I know Stieglitz at 4 seems high but it was a 60/40 fight beforehand. Obviously in hindsight Stieglitz didn't have much to offer.
Abraham actually had a ridiculously good year and bravo to him for taking Ramirez next. Another top 10 fighter.