BoxRec

Dohoupas is better than Charr

Szpilka is much better boxer than this slow robotic Wach . Wach has poor KO ratio against D level opposition. Wach has only chin lmao. He trhows 7 jabs per round. Szpilka is much better boxer. His movement , speed and everything exept his chin. Szpilka is the best Poland boxer right now.


How much is Stiverne worse than Takam or Perez? People complain about who has Stiverne beat , but let's be fair. Takam lost against Gregory Tony and he has only one legit win against old Thompson. He needed 8 rounds against old Michael Grant You all know what Lewis did to young prime Grant

So only one guy was much worse and it was Eric Molina.

I do not get this HYPE .

Povetkin has some good wins over Byrd or Chagaev but in was in the past.

conty22 wrote:Dohoupas is better than Charr

Szpilka is much better boxer than this slow robotic Wach . Wach has poor KO ratio against D level opposition. Wach has only chin lmao. He trhows 7 jabs per round. Szpilka is much better boxer. His movement , speed and everything exept his chin. Szpilka is the best Poland boxer right now.


How much is Stiverne worse than Takam or Perez? People complain about who has Stiverne beat , but let's be fair. Takam lost against Gregory Tony and he has only one legit win against old Thompson. He needed 8 rounds against old Michael Grant You all know what Lewis did to young prime Grant

So only one guy was much worse and it was Eric Molina.

I do not get this HYPE .

Povetkin has some good wins over Byrd or Chagaev but in was in the past.

Now all the Povetkin's fans (and/or Wilder haters) will it you alive-)))

By the way, Szpilka has a not bad chin...no chin could stand that Wilder's punch!

conty22 wrote:Dohoupas is better than Charr

Szpilka is much better boxer than this slow robotic Wach . Wach has poor KO ratio against D level opposition. Wach has only chin lmao. He trhows 7 jabs per round. Szpilka is much better boxer. His movement , speed and everything exept his chin. Szpilka is the best Poland boxer right now.


How much is Stiverne worse than Takam or Perez? People complain about who has Stiverne beat , but let's be fair. Takam lost against Gregory Tony and he has only one legit win against old Thompson. He needed 8 rounds against old Michael Grant You all know what Lewis did to young prime Grant

So only one guy was much worse and it was Eric Molina.

I do not get this HYPE .

Povetkin has some good wins over Byrd or Chagaev but in was in the past.

I agree that right now, Duhaupas is better than Charr, but Charr is clearly on the decline - when he fought Povetkin he had only lost to Vitali and that was arguably a premature stoppage and was coming off a five fight win streak (although by reports his decision over Johnson was dubious). Looking at their BoxRec ratings at the time they fought Povetkin and Wilder:
Duhaupas - 182
Charr - 289

I agree that Szpilka is a much better boxer than Wach, but he's also much smaller and weaker chinned. Considering that Jennings and MInto did to Szpilka, Wilder's performance against him was far from impressive (up until the KO of course). That Povetkin stopped Wach and the much bigger Wlad couldn't is very impressive.

Perez once looked formidable, but I think he will never be that same after the Mago fight. Takam, on the other hand, was a formidable opponent and a very good win for Povetkin - I would say on the same level as Wilder beating Stiverne.

I agree that based on recent opponents they are comparable (though I think Povetkin comes slightly ahead), but the way that Povetkin has been winning has been more impressive and he would deserve to start as a narrow favourite against Wilder.

Potvetkin will do the same to Wilder that he did to Perez. But if Potvetkin is going to be so easy for Wilder why does he just not fight him? The reason why is because he is a bum. His resume sucks and he has never fought or beaten anyone of note. He did not step in the ring with Wlad. Potvetkin did. The win Pot has over Mike Perez is better than anything Wilder has done. Wilder is a bum and a fraud and everyone knows it deep in their hearts. But if America cannot have a real champ they will gladly take a fake one. And that is what America has a fake champ. So congrats on that. Rather than settle it in the ring by fighting what has been the number one contender for a while now the cowardly Wilder would rather you fight it out for him on these boards.

Lancenix wrote:Potvetkin will do the same to Wilder that he did to Perez. But if Potvetkin is going to be so easy for Wilder why does he just not fight him? The reason why is because he is a bum. His resume sucks and he has never fought or beaten anyone of note. He did not step in the ring with Wlad. Potvetkin did. The win Pot has over Mike Perez is better than anything Wilder has done. Wilder is a bum and a fraud and everyone knows it deep in their hearts. But if America cannot have a real champ they will gladly take a fake one. And that is what America has a fake champ. So congrats on that. Rather than settle it in the ring by fighting what has been the number one contender for a while now the cowardly Wilder would rather you fight it out for him on these boards.

So we are back to "Wilder the bum and fraud is afraid to fight Povetkin?"

Badhusker wrote:

Lancenix wrote:Potvetkin will do the same to Wilder that he did to Perez. But if Potvetkin is going to be so easy for Wilder why does he just not fight him? The reason why is because he is a bum. His resume sucks and he has never fought or beaten anyone of note. He did not step in the ring with Wlad. Potvetkin did. The win Pot has over Mike Perez is better than anything Wilder has done. Wilder is a bum and a fraud and everyone knows it deep in their hearts. But if America cannot have a real champ they will gladly take a fake one. And that is what America has a fake champ. So congrats on that. Rather than settle it in the ring by fighting what has been the number one contender for a while now the cowardly Wilder would rather you fight it out for him on these boards.

So we are back to "Wilder the bum and fraud is afraid to fight Povetkin?"

What do you mean back to it? It has been my prevailing thought and statement ever since the coward Wilder decided to make his first title defense Eric Molina. Wilder is a bum man he is like Brice Seldon. Possibly worse. He is a complete bum.

conty22 wrote:Dohoupas is better than Charr

Szpilka is much better boxer than this slow robotic Wach . Wach has poor KO ratio against D level opposition. Wach has only chin lmao. He trhows 7 jabs per round. Szpilka is much better boxer. His movement , speed and everything exept his chin. Szpilka is the best Poland boxer right now.


How much is Stiverne worse than Takam or Perez? People complain about who has Stiverne beat , but let's be fair. Takam lost against Gregory Tony and he has only one legit win against old Thompson. He needed 8 rounds against old Michael Grant You all know what Lewis did to young prime Grant

So only one guy was much worse and it was Eric Molina.

I do not get this HYPE .

Povetkin has some good wins over Byrd or Chagaev but in was in the past.

Charr and Duhaupas did fight each other, and I thought Charr deserved the decision. I'd agree with you that Szpilka is better than Wach. Stiverne is easily the best opponent that Wilder has beaten Povetkin has beaten quite a few guys at that skill level.

stiverne is mediocre. king hype job

szpilka was ko'd by a Jennings body punch

duhaupas is a big lug

Molina was ko'd in 1 round by Arreola.

hardly championship material