Page 1 of 1

Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 21 Feb 2016, 10:53
by fightfan95
I didn't manage to watch Chudinov v Sturm last night, I heard it was an awful decision - is it worth me watching I think I recorded it.

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 21 Feb 2016, 10:58
by stevedoc
i thought it was a decent fight

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 21 Feb 2016, 13:26
by Tanzio
fightfan95 wrote:I didn't manage to watch Chudinov v Sturm last night, I heard it was an awful decision - is it worth me watching I think I recorded it.
Even in a loss that is horribly turned into a victory for him, Sturm is worth watching. Chudinov is the future and that is always worth checking out.

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 21 Feb 2016, 15:35
by fightfan95
Tanzio wrote:
fightfan95 wrote:I didn't manage to watch Chudinov v Sturm last night, I heard it was an awful decision - is it worth me watching I think I recorded it.
Even in a loss that is horribly turned into a victory for him, Sturm is worth watching. Chudinov is the future and that is always worth checking out.
I haven't seen much of Chudinov if I'm being honest and I've never really been a fan of Sturm :maybe: but I'm sure I will give it a watch after work tomorrow. How did you score it?

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 21 Feb 2016, 15:53
by Tanzio
fightfan95 wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
fightfan95 wrote:I didn't manage to watch Chudinov v Sturm last night, I heard it was an awful decision - is it worth me watching I think I recorded it.
Even in a loss that is horribly turned into a victory for him, Sturm is worth watching. Chudinov is the future and that is always worth checking out.
I haven't seen much of Chudinov if I'm being honest and I've never really been a fan of Sturm :maybe: but I'm sure I will give it a watch after work tomorrow. How did you score it?
I did not score it, but Chudinov's dominance was clear. I may go back and score it since it was such a poor decision. I can't see Sturm being awarded more than four rounds and that is being generous. But, tbh, the second time around can sometimes be surprising.

I did want Chudinov to win and Sturm to be retired. Therefore, my bias may have affected my view. I doubt it, but it is possible.

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 21 Feb 2016, 16:08
by Roars Like Me
Just wondering as I didn't see it, was the 1st fight unfair on Sturm?

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 21 Feb 2016, 16:14
by Tanzio
Roars Like Me wrote:Just wondering as I didn't see it, was the 1st fight unfair on Sturm?
Not in my opinion.

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 04:24
by Roars Like Me
Tanzio wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote:Just wondering as I didn't see it, was the 1st fight unfair on Sturm?
Not in my opinion.
So feasible for Sturm to have won the 1st one then - I can see a rubber on it's way..

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 06:20
by Reece_D
Trying to be as generous as possible to Sturm I scored it 117-113 to Chudinov. Another robbery in Germany in a dull fight I thought.

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 19:59
by crusader
Roars Like Me wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote:Just wondering as I didn't see it, was the 1st fight unfair on Sturm?
Not in my opinion.
So feasible for Sturm to have won the 1st one then - I can see a rubber on it's way..
Sturm clearly deserved to lose both fights (I've given him just 5 of their 24 rounds).

Incidentally, I had him edging Murray and think it would've been reasonable to score the Geale and Soliman I fights for him, but hometown judging was back in full force this time.

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 20:32
by Perseus
crusader wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote:
Tanzio wrote: Not in my opinion.
So feasible for Sturm to have won the 1st one then - I can see a rubber on it's way..
Sturm clearly deserved to lose both fights (I've given him just 5 of their 24 rounds).

Incidentally, I had him edging Murray and think it would've been reasonable to score the Geale and Soliman I fights for him, but hometown judging was back in full force this time.
Judges in Germany are not very consistent with Sturm are they?
I had him beating Murray too but Felix only got a draw out of that one.
Geale and Soliman 1 were both close enough to reasonably go either way............both went against Sturm.
Then this one........Felix clearly beaten but the decision goes his way.
I guess it's better than ALL of the debatable decisions going his way.

Re: Is it worth a watch?

Posted: 23 Feb 2016, 04:37
by Roars Like Me
crusader wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote:
Tanzio wrote: Not in my opinion.
So feasible for Sturm to have won the 1st one then - I can see a rubber on it's way..
Sturm clearly deserved to lose both fights (I've given him just 5 of their 24 rounds).

Incidentally, I had him edging Murray and think it would've been reasonable to score the Geale and Soliman I fights for him, but hometown judging was back in full force this time.

Yes the hometown judging is horrible in Germany sometimes - I wonder how Sturm v Ottke would have panned out there, that would confuse them all :doh: