Did emanuel steward let tommy hearns down circa 1988-91
Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 21:03
Tommy hearns became a shot fighter the instant that whoah nellie right hand smashed his skull onto the canvas one summers night in 1988
It was a momentary defensive lapse .....and thats all it took for iran barkley to end the last vestiges of the hit mans peak.
Even than for 8 minutes tommy had been blisteringly fast and clinical in dissecting iran body to head....giving him an inhuman beating and pulping his face into a ripe mush of crenshaw melon.He administered the beating with such arrogance and superiority.
Yet the writing had been on the wall for 18 months vs dewitt,andries and roldan.....the last two victories had been spectacular but each time his legs betrayed him
The barkley punch tho seemed to forever beat some of tommys hand speed and reflexes out of him.His chin too suddenly seemed beyond the point of no return
At this point ,Emanuel Steward started to seemingly disparage/psychological y denigrate tommy to the american boxing writers.you"d read how he wouldnt allow tommy to spar michael moorer and " kept him away from young dangerous fighters in sparring" and michael nunn. The new york press were harping on about sugar ray and nunn would massacre tommy
Yes Emmanuel was his dear friend and didnt want to see a legend decline.
But the reality is even a 70percent tommy was a phenomenal fighter, and the fact is hearns adapted to the decline in chin and legs and loss of speed by fighting more stationary and tightning up his defence
Retrospective sparring videos show he was ably handling gerald mclellan and james toney in sparring at this time.of course he went on to "beat " ray and having ditched steward primarily because of his concerns he went on to beat virgil hill.
At this time he was even sparring evander.
Do u think it was wrong of emanuel to doubt Tommy in the press? Disloyal and premature even? Or justified ?
It was a momentary defensive lapse .....and thats all it took for iran barkley to end the last vestiges of the hit mans peak.
Even than for 8 minutes tommy had been blisteringly fast and clinical in dissecting iran body to head....giving him an inhuman beating and pulping his face into a ripe mush of crenshaw melon.He administered the beating with such arrogance and superiority.
Yet the writing had been on the wall for 18 months vs dewitt,andries and roldan.....the last two victories had been spectacular but each time his legs betrayed him
The barkley punch tho seemed to forever beat some of tommys hand speed and reflexes out of him.His chin too suddenly seemed beyond the point of no return
At this point ,Emanuel Steward started to seemingly disparage/psychological y denigrate tommy to the american boxing writers.you"d read how he wouldnt allow tommy to spar michael moorer and " kept him away from young dangerous fighters in sparring" and michael nunn. The new york press were harping on about sugar ray and nunn would massacre tommy
Yes Emmanuel was his dear friend and didnt want to see a legend decline.
But the reality is even a 70percent tommy was a phenomenal fighter, and the fact is hearns adapted to the decline in chin and legs and loss of speed by fighting more stationary and tightning up his defence
Retrospective sparring videos show he was ably handling gerald mclellan and james toney in sparring at this time.of course he went on to "beat " ray and having ditched steward primarily because of his concerns he went on to beat virgil hill.
At this time he was even sparring evander.
Do u think it was wrong of emanuel to doubt Tommy in the press? Disloyal and premature even? Or justified ?