BoxRec

When they realised that Big Ben & the Houses of Parliament were in the background of this photo.

I bet they were well p1ssed off. I'm surprised they didn't do the photo shot on Wandsworth Common or somewhere like that.

Someone is going to get a rocket up their aris for this mistake.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/02/ ... 314086.jpg

Why?

banjo wrote:Why?

Exactly my point

A photoshoot in London generally involves a national landmark in the background, that's just one of them

Totally confused by this thread. Am I missing a joke somewhere? They are in the background on purpose. They did not put them on a boat, outside of these landmarks, to not have them in the photo.

What an odd thread

I'm glad the pair of you see my point of view.

That photographer is out on his arse.

I can't make any sense of this I am lost Not as big of a difference in size as I initially thought.

The photographer could have tried to cut the scaffolding out the picture, otherwise it's a decent photo

keirw wrote:The photographer could have tried to cut the scaffolding out the picture, otherwise it's a decent photo

I actually thought he'd photoshopped that in to try to cover up Big Ben

what in the name of jehovah are you going on about man?

chiggsy wrote:what in the name of jehovah are you going on about man?

Stuarty30 wrote:I can't make any sense of this I am lost Not as big of a difference in size as I initially thought.

They are about the same height, in fact Khan may be a bit taller, (I don't believe for a second that Canelo is really 5'9") so I imagine that there are going to be many photos like that where they seem about the same size. Height often has a way of obscuring general size disparities in that way and I expect Canelo to be significantly heavier on the night....

crusader wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:I can't make any sense of this I am lost Not as big of a difference in size as I initially thought.

They are about the same height, in fact Khan may be a bit taller, (I don't believe for a second that Canelo is really 5'9") so I imagine that there are going to be many photos like that where they seem about the same size. Height often has a way of obscuring general size disparities in that way and I expect Canelo to be significantly heavier on the night....

Yeah same. Khan is quite thin and Canelo looks more compact. I'm looking forward to the fight but the catch weight crap is just bollux. Middleweight world champion but won't fight at 160!!! Give me strength.

By co-incidence, I was out and about with the family on the South Bank on Sunday. It was bloody freezing. I reckon they were both happy to do the bare minimum for the cameraman and then retire to the limo.

Taansend wrote:I'm glad the pair of you see my point of view.

That photographer is out on his arse.

F*ck my arse with a banjo, it gets worse.

have a look at this effort. There's a bloody great big wheel in the background.

When I said take a photo at Wandsworth Common I didn't mean during the fair

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/02/ ... 847804.jpg

Taansend wrote:F*ck my arse with a banjo, it gets worse.

have a look at this effort. There's a bloody great big wheel in the background.

When I said take a photo at Wandsworth Common I didn't mean during the fair

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/02/ ... 847804.jpg

I don't know anything about photography so this is way over my head

You're right, they should have selected proper London landmarks to use as backdrops for those pictures.
Like the Beckton Sewage plant, or the Old Abbatoir, or Loftus Road.