Page 1 of 2

Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 03:58
by johnswan1
The never ending story, this is taking far too long to get organised. Fury sure does seem to spend a long time between fights.

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/4168 ... moter-says

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 04:47
by stevedoc
the good news is it's set to happen over here at a football ground ,old trafford or wembley i'd guess . it seems that fury is losing some momentum here it's not impossible that if AJ beats martin for the ibf belt that fury could find himself playing second fiddle to AJ in the popularity

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 04:56
by Syntax Error
Nothing is ever simple with Tyson Fury.

Thanks mostly to David Haye, he didn't get his title shot for 2 years & now he's finally the champ, he can't he organise a timely rematch with the guy he won the title from.

I'm beginning to feel a bit sorry for him.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 05:17
by leejonesjnr
stevedoc wrote:the good news is it's set to happen over here at a football ground ,old trafford or wembley i'd guess . it seems that fury is losing some momentum here it's not impossible that if AJ beats martin for the ibf belt that fury could find himself playing second fiddle to AJ in the popularity
He's already massively behind Joshua in the popularity stakes I'd say

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 05:55
by big lennox
I get the impression that this is the Klitschko's messing Fury about, not allowing him to get any momentum and frustrate him. Surely, there must come a point where he just moves on. He has got all the belts and the win. Klitschko needs him more than the other way round.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 06:19
by Oiky
big lennox wrote:I get the impression that this is the Klitschko's messing Fury about, not allowing him to get any momentum and frustrate him. Surely, there must come a point where he just moves on. He has got all the belts and the win. Klitschko needs him more than the other way round.
i agree :TU:

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 06:30
by afcmarshall
Have a feeling this fight will never happen

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 07:05
by Rexob
Fury is already 24stone so hope its not much longer else he might be pipping 30! Maybe thats the big klits plan?

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 07:10
by johnswan1
Definitely something very odd going on here. There have been references to Fury's chronic back pain. Seems like neither guy fancies it that much. I wonder if there is something in the contract to say that the rematch must happen within a certain timeframe, and whether Fury can get out of that with a sicknote. If that sort of thing happens and gets drawn out too long it's probably likely Wlad would retire rather than face somebody else.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 07:46
by Sklar
Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he fornicate. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 07:51
by tigermoth87
Is it in the contract that Fury can't defend his belt against anyone else before he does the rematch?

That's a ridiculously huge lay-off, really he should try to squeeze in a stay busy defence vs some bum like Glazkov if possible. Just to give him the motivation to keep in shape and such.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 07:53
by Nightmare Roy
Sklar wrote:
Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he eff. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).
Yeah think that was a wind up he looked ok to me in the vid.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 07:59
by johnswan1
BTW - does anybody think this fight would sell out a 50,000+ seater stadium in the UK?

I doubt it. In fact, even though Fury is now champ, I think the fight was probably bigger first time round than it is now. Previously it carried hype and everybody wanted to see what Fury could do. Now we've seen it - the fight was dull, and most would expect a similar type of fight and similar outcome. If he wins again it's no big deal, just a repeat of what happened before. Doesn't really sound like the sort of fight that would create a huge level of demand. Maybe if Matchroom were involved, but not sure Hennessy can pull off selling out an event to that size of crowd.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 08:01
by Rexob
Sklar wrote:
Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he eff. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).

How do you know? have you been talking to him in Tescos or something?

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 08:04
by Offal
leejonesjnr wrote:He's already massively behind Joshua in the popularity stakes I'd say
Yes.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 08:07
by Offal
Sklar wrote:
Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he eff. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).
There's some reason he was wearing that baggy grey monstrosity on Saturday, he may not be 24st but I bet he's over the 20st mark.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 08:16
by Boxerbeetle
Remember when Channel 5 put Fury in front of a table stacked with crisps and sweets and he talked us through his diet? :lol:

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 08:40
by freddydoesdallas
johnswan1 wrote:BTW - does anybody think this fight would sell out a 50,000+ seater stadium in the UK?

I doubt it. In fact, even though Fury is now champ, I think the fight was probably bigger first time round than it is now. Previously it carried hype and everybody wanted to see what Fury could do. Now we've seen it - the fight was dull, and most would expect a similar type of fight and similar outcome. If he wins again it's no big deal, just a repeat of what happened before. Doesn't really sound like the sort of fight that would create a huge level of demand. Maybe if Matchroom were involved, but not sure Hennessy can pull off selling out an event to that size of crowd.
No, i don't think it would now.

First time round, i would have paid to go and watch Wlad if it was in this country. Immediately afterwards (well if the fight was about to happen now) i think it would have as the build up would never have stopped. Now, however, i think the general public have forgotten about him and are about to have a more high profile heavyweight champ

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 08:44
by Noxy
This is really getting boring.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 08:48
by Stuarty
Noxy wrote:This is really getting boring.
It really is. Typical Klitschko bollux! The sooner he fucks off the better.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 09:11
by jamesmcdonnell
Stuarty30 wrote:
Noxy wrote:This is really getting boring.
It really is. Typical Klitschko bollux! The sooner he fucks off the better.
According to the new item, the fight was partially delayed by an Injury Fury sustained.

They are probably also struggling to find venues in the summer.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 09:33
by Stuarty
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Noxy wrote:This is really getting boring.
It really is. Typical Klitschko bollux! The sooner he fucks off the better.
According to the new item, the fight was partially delayed by an Injury Fury sustained.

They are probably also struggling to find venues in the summer.
I thought because there was a rematch clause in place things would've went smooth(ish). If it's an injury to either it obviously can't be helped but Wlad is notoriously difficult to deal with. Wouldn't surprise me if the hold up was down to petty demands/squabbling.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 09:37
by Offal
Fury should have given back all the (four I think?) belts after the Wlad fight, and just done his own thing, until someone beats him in the ring (for better or worse) he is Heavyweight Champion of the World.

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 09:40
by handsofstone
Seems Fury could've maybe fitted in the Glazkov defence kept the IBF and made more money in the long run

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Posted: 31 Mar 2016, 10:14
by johnswan1
Offal wrote:Fury should have given back all the (four I think?) belts after the Wlad fight, and just done his own thing, until someone beats him in the ring (for better or worse) he is Heavyweight Champion of the World.
He could have thrown the IBF/WBO/WBA belts in the bin publicly and kept the Ring belt, which does not require sanctioning fees or mandatory defenses. Would have been a good protest against the alphabet bodies who have become so greedy that even one champion per division is not enough. Having beaten Klitschko he still would have been considered the real champ regardless of whether he kept the belts or not.