Page 1 of 1
Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 10:14
by Chepppaaa
Ortiz
Usyk
Kovalev
Degale
GGG
Lara
Spence
Crawford
Rances
Uchiyama
Lomachenko
Rigondeaux
Yamanaka
Inoue
Gonzales
Nietes
Menayothin
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 11:13
by BitPlayer
Ortiz? What's he done to make himself No. 1? Surely it's Fury or maybe Wilder.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 11:18
by tigermoth87
Fury
Lebedev
Kovalev
Callum Smith (Not a title holder yet but he beats AA. Degale would be closer but I think Smith has enough to take it)
GGG
Lara
Brook
Postol
Flanagan
Uchiyama
Lomachenko
Frampton
McDonnell
Inoue
Gonzalez
Nietes
Menayothin
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 11:38
by ikorolev
Usyk and Spence haven't defeated anybody to be #1. They have a good potential though.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 11:45
by Ricky_
Hate to say it but the undisputable #1 & #2 in the HW division are Fury then Wlad. You can't deny that.
Kovalev is clearly #1. Ward has moved into his division. Up to him and Stevenson to knock him off.
Golovkin and Gonzalez are the top 2 p4p in the sport and have been for a while so they are far and away kings of thier divisions.
Pacquiao/Bradley winner is welterweight #1, few up and comers but Pac or Brad are the fighters they need to beat.
Rigondeaux needs to fight. I'll give him #1 but Frampton is knocking on the door.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 12:15
by BitPlayer
Just out of interest here's The Ring Champions or No. 1s
TYSON FURY (Champ)
GRIGORY DROZD
SERGEY KOVALEV
ARTHUR ABRAHAM
CANELO ALVAREZ (Champ)
ERISLANDY LARA
KELL BROOK
VIKTOR POSTOL
JORGE LINARES
TAKASHI UCHIYAMA
VASYL LOMACHENKO
GUILLERMO RIGONDEAUX
SHINSUKE YAMANAKA
NAOYA INOUE
ROMAN GONZALEZ (Champ)
DONNIE NIETES (Champ)
TAKASHI UCHIYAMA
I don't know enough to be comfortable in my own rankings.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 16:00
by fanman
All i know is;
Heavy - Fury
Light heavy - Kovalev
Middle - Golovkin
...
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 16:02
by Lancenix
fanman wrote:All i know is;
Heavy - Fury
Light heavy - Kovalev
Middle - Golovkin
...
Agreed with those 3 selections/.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 16:03
by Lancenix
BitPlayer wrote:Just out of interest here's The Ring Champions or No. 1s
TYSON FURY (Champ)
GRIGORY DROZD
SERGEY KOVALEV
ARTHUR ABRAHAM
CANELO ALVAREZ (Champ)
ERISLANDY LARA
KELL BROOK
VIKTOR POSTOL
JORGE LINARES
TAKASHI UCHIYAMA
VASYL LOMACHENKO
GUILLERMO RIGONDEAUX
SHINSUKE YAMANAKA
NAOYA INOUE
ROMAN GONZALEZ (Champ)
DONNIE NIETES (Champ)
TAKASHI UCHIYAMA
I don't know enough to be comfortable in my own rankings.
And nor should you be comfortable with that list.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 16:51
by gilgamesh
Tyson Fury - Heavyweight
Glowacki - Cruiserweight
Kovalev - Light Heavyweight
Abraham - Super Middleweight
Golovkin - Middleweight
Lara - Jr. Middleweight
Winner of Porter/Thurman - Welterweight
Crawford - Jr. Welterweight
Jorge Linares - Lightweight (Though it will be Dejan Zlaticanin when Dejan gets his shot)
Takashi Uchiyama - Jr. Lightweight
Lomachenko - Featherweight
Rigo - Jr. Featherweight
Yamanaka - Bantamweight
Naoya Inoue - Jr. Bantamweight
Chocolatito - Flyweight
Donnie Nietes - Jr. Flyweight
Knockout CP Freshmart - Strawweight
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 19:32
by BitPlayer
Lancenix wrote:And nor should you be comfortable with that list.
I didn't say I agreed with it or it was right, I just thought it was interesting.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 19:40
by Chepppaaa
ikorolev wrote:Usyk and Spence haven't defeated anybody to be #1. They have a good potential though.
why should i pick lebedev or drozd over usyk, when i think usyk beats them both, he is the #1 because i would favour over anybody at cw?
same for spence. who would you put at #1 ww right now, a past prime pacquiao, a weak midget like timmy?

spence is the best.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 21:18
by Taki...
Chepppaaa wrote:ikorolev wrote:Usyk and Spence haven't defeated anybody to be #1. They have a good potential though.
why should i pick lebedev or drozd over usyk, when i think usyk beats them both, he is the #1 because i would favour over anybody at cw?
same for spence. who would you put at #1 ww right now, a past prime pacquiao, a weak midget like timmy?

spence is the best.
I always enjoy someone basing their rankings on who they IMAGINE a fighter would beat rather than who a fighter has actually beaten. It almost removes the need for fighters to box each other at all.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 22:28
by Lancenix
Taki... wrote:Chepppaaa wrote:ikorolev wrote:Usyk and Spence haven't defeated anybody to be #1. They have a good potential though.
why should i pick lebedev or drozd over usyk, when i think usyk beats them both, he is the #1 because i would favour over anybody at cw?
same for spence. who would you put at #1 ww right now, a past prime pacquiao, a weak midget like timmy?

spence is the best.
I always enjoy someone basing their rankings on who they IMAGINE a fighter would beat rather than who a fighter has actually beaten. It almost removes the need for fighters to box each other at all.
Which is pretty much what you have to do in boxing these days since less and less guys want to fight each other.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 Apr 2016, 23:32
by jamesmcdonnell
Sad to say, despite having been a boxing fan for 40 years, I don't know who the best is in many divisions. Too little exposure, too many belts.
Fury is the man.
Cruiserweight - f knowns right now.
Kovalev without doubt, the ward fight will cement who the man is.
Golovkin
Jr middleweight - god knows.
Floyd, - he hasn't really retired.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 03 Apr 2016, 00:18
by HyacinthusTurnipseed
Mine has ended up fairly similar to Gilgamesh's. Like the OP I'll try to ignore "lineage" and just go for the guy I think is the best, based on available evidence.
Tyson Fury - Heavyweight (think he beats Wilder and Ortiz (and at least for the moment, AJ))
[vacant] - Cruiserweight (Glowacki didn't look outstanding vs. Huck, Lebedev hasn't fully shaken the GJones stink off yet, Usyk is unproven)
Kovalev - Light Heavyweight
DeGale - Super Middleweight (underrated talent, much better than Abraham, does switch off in fights sometimes)
Golovkin - Middleweight
Lara - Jr. Middleweight
Brook - Welterweight (think he is better than Thurman and Garcia. Pacquiao is all but done. Spence super-unproven)
Crawford - Jr. Welterweight
[vacant] - Lightweight (wanna see some fights between Linares, Zlaticanin, Barthelemy and Flanagan before committing)
Takashi Uchiyama - Jr. Lightweight
Lomachenko - Featherweight
Rigo - Jr. Featherweight
Yamanaka - Bantamweight
Naoya Inoue - Jr. Bantamweight
Chocolatito - Flyweight
Donnie Nietes - Jr. Flyweight
Knockout CP Freshmart - Strawweight (have seen a few of his fights. Will have to check out Menayothin tomorrow and possibly edit this)
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 03 Apr 2016, 00:21
by gilgamesh
HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:Mine has ended up fairly similar to Gilgamesh's. Like the OP I'll try to ignore "lineage" and just go for the guy I think is the best, based on available evidence.
Tyson Fury - Heavyweight (think he beats Wilder and Ortiz (and at least for the moment, AJ))
[vacant] - Cruiserweight (Glowacki didn't look outstanding vs. Huck, Lebedev hasn't fully shaken the GJones stink off yet, Usyk is unproven)
Kovalev - Light Heavyweight
DeGale - Super Middleweight (underrated talent, much better than Abraham, does switch off in fights sometimes)
Golovkin - Middleweight
Lara - Jr. Middleweight
Brook - Welterweight (think he is better than Thurman and Garcia. Pacquiao is all but done. Spence super-unproven)
Crawford - Jr. Welterweight
[vacant] - Lightweight (wanna see some fights between Linares, Zlaticanin, Barthelemy and Flanagan before committing)
Takashi Uchiyama - Jr. Lightweight
Lomachenko - Featherweight
Rigo - Jr. Featherweight
Yamanaka - Bantamweight
Naoya Inoue - Jr. Bantamweight
Chocolatito - Flyweight
Donnie Nietes - Jr. Flyweight
Knockout CP Freshmart - Strawweight (have seen a few of his fights. Will have to check out Menayothin tomorrow and possibly edit this)
For the record I don't think Tyson Fury is the most talented Heavyweight right now, and I think at least 2 or 3 of the Top 10 could beat him, but nobody has a bigger win than his win over Wlad so I have no choice but to give him the #1 spot for now.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 03 Apr 2016, 05:52
by Mexi-Box
Fury-Heavyweight (Easy anyone having different is completely WRONG!)
Lebedev-Cruiserweight (Drozd hasn't done anything lately)
Kovalev-Light Heavyweight (Easily, he's P4P higher than Stevenson and owns 3 of the 4 belts)
DeGale-Super Middleweight (Arguable because Jack and Abraham also have been racking up good wins, mainly Jack, though)
Golovkin-Middleweight
Lara-Super Middleweight
Pacquiao-Welterweight (Easily, he's the number 1 in the division)
Postol-Light Welterweight (Has the best resume in the division KO Matthysse)
Linares-Lightweight (Open division between Linares, Barthelemy, and Zlaticanin this one is very hard)
Uchiyama-Super Featherweight
Lomachenko-Featherweight
Rigondeaux-Super Bantamweight (Anyone else is wrong!)
Yamanaka-Bantamweight (Robbed Moreno, though, if not for that it would be Moreno)
Inoue-Super Flyweight
Gonzalez-Flyweight
Nietes-Light Flyweight
Menayothin-Strawweight
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 03 Apr 2016, 05:59
by Lennox
Chepppaaa wrote:Ortiz
Usyk
Kovalev
Degale
GGG
Lara
Spence
Crawford
Rances
Uchiyama
Lomachenko
Rigondeaux
Yamanaka
Inoue
Gonzales
Nietes
Menayothin
Well done you got a few right
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 06 Apr 2016, 17:08
by Chepppaaa
Lennox wrote:Chepppaaa wrote:Ortiz
Usyk
Kovalev
Degale
GGG
Lara
Spence
Crawford
Rances
Uchiyama
Lomachenko
Rigondeaux
Yamanaka
Inoue
Gonzales
Nietes
Menayothin
Well done you got a few right
yeah, but since the best dont fight the best, we will never 100 % know
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 06 Apr 2016, 17:29
by BAD INTENTIONS
Just 3 matches from any list above within reasonable weight differences would be good.
Re: Who's the #1 in every division?
Posted: 02 May 2016, 01:41
by Taki...
Bump