BoxRec

This seems pathetic to me.

It seems like a loser expressing his envy of a MUCH more talented and exciting boxer. Fury was not at all impressive against old faded age 40 Klitschko, although he did enough to win a boring UD. Joshua is very impressive and exciting in every fight so far.

https://twitter.com/Tyson_Fury/status/7 ... 5681674240
https://twitter.com/Tyson_Fury/status/7 ... 4523610112
https://twitter.com/Tyson_Fury/status/7 ... 6604818433

Unlike Fury, both Anthony Joshua and Wladimir Klitschko are intelligent men with proper manners. They are good sports who respect their opponents and give credit where it's due. Fury has the social graces of a drunken, drooling boar and behaves like a spoiled, senseless, out-of-control child.

I hope Wlad fights next time and wins the rematch. I look forward to seeing Fury get put to sleep. If he beats Wlad twice he'll still lose to the first person he defends against that's not Wlad I figure.

Freedom2013 wrote:This seems pathetic to me.

It seems like a loser expressing his envy of a MUCH more talented and exciting boxer. Fury was not at all impressive against old faded age 40 Klitschko, although he did enough to win a boring UD. Joshua is very impressive and exciting in every fight so far.

https://twitter.com/Tyson_Fury/status/7 ... 5681674240
https://twitter.com/Tyson_Fury/status/7 ... 4523610112
https://twitter.com/Tyson_Fury/status/7 ... 6604818433

Unlike Fury, both Anthony Joshua and Wladimir Klitschko are intelligent men with proper manners. They are good sports who respect their opponents and give credit where it's due. Fury has the social graces of a drunken, drooling boar and behaves like a spoiled, senseless, out-of-control child.

It's all bout the game fam, you gotz played. Fury is as smart as they come, he's starting his marketing campaign for the fight early. He will happily play the bad guy.

gilgamesh wrote:I hope Wlad fights next time and wins the rematch. I look forward to seeing Fury get put to sleep. If he beats Wlad twice he'll still lose to the first person he defends against that's not Wlad I figure.

Nothing would please me more than seeing age 40 Wlad KO the big jackass.

But yes, Fury will lose to the first prime-aged top 10 heavyweight he fights.

Freedom2013 wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:I hope Wlad fights next time and wins the rematch. I look forward to seeing Fury get put to sleep. If he beats Wlad twice he'll still lose to the first person he defends against that's not Wlad I figure.

Nothing would please me more than seeing age 40 Wlad KO the big jackass.

But yes, Fury will lose to the first prime-aged top 10 heavyweight he fights.

Despite the fact he just clowned the lineal champ who had dominated for a decade?

Nightmare Roy wrote:

Freedom2013 wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:I hope Wlad fights next time and wins the rematch. I look forward to seeing Fury get put to sleep. If he beats Wlad twice he'll still lose to the first person he defends against that's not Wlad I figure.

Nothing would please me more than seeing age 40 Wlad KO the big jackass.

But yes, Fury will lose to the first prime-aged top 10 heavyweight he fights.

Despite the fact he just clowned the lineal champ who had dominated for a decade?

Wladimir didn't fight. He didn't throw punches. A win over an opponent who didn't fight back isn't an impressive feat. No matter how accomplished they are.

Even if somebody beat Floyd Mayweather in his 50th fight. If Floyd Mayweather just came in the ring and stood there doing f*ck all for 12 rounds, I wouldn't be impressed.

gilgamesh wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote:

Freedom2013 wrote:Nothing would please me more than seeing age 40 Wlad KO the big jackass.

But yes, Fury will lose to the first prime-aged top 10 heavyweight he fights.

Despite the fact he just clowned the lineal champ who had dominated for a decade?

Wladimir didn't fight. He didn't throw punches. A win over an opponent who didn't fight back isn't an impressive feat. No matter how accomplished they are.

Even if somebody beat Floyd Mayweather in his 50th fight. If Floyd Mayweather just came in the ring and stood there doing f*ck all for 12 rounds, I wouldn't be impressed.

he wasn't allowed to fight, Fury was too smart for him.

Nightmare Roy wrote: he wasn't allowed to fight, Fury was too smart for him.

No. Wlad just fought like a shot old boxer.

Fury never beat him, Father Time beat him.

Freedom2013 wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote: he wasn't allowed to fight, Fury was too smart for him.

No. Wlad just fought like a shot old boxer.

Fury never beat him, Father Time beat him.

You do realise there is a very good chance he could do the same to AJ right?

The anti-Fury nonsense on here is just dumb.

Nightmare Roy wrote:You do realise there is a very good chance he could do the same to AJ right?

No. Joshua isn't 40 years old.

Fury will be badly exposed as a mediocre fighter if he ever fights Joshua.

Freedom2013 wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote:You do realise there is a very good chance he could do the same to AJ right?

No. Joshua isn't 40 years old.

Fury will be badly exposed as a mediocre fighter if he ever fights Joshua.

I hope the bookmakers share your opinion.

Fury = undisputed heavyweight champion of the world and the man who beat the man

Joshua = Young unproven fighter who picked up one of Fury's scraps and has beaten a big gutless pudding in a charade labeled as a title fight.

Those who cannot see these facts, as laid out above = haters!

Nightmare Roy wrote:

Freedom2013 wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote:You do realise there is a very good chance he could do the same to AJ right?

No. Joshua isn't 40 years old.

Fury will be badly exposed as a mediocre fighter if he ever fights Joshua.

I hope the bookmakers share your opinion.

Joshua will probably be a slight dog.

I'm absolutely loving the Heavyweight division these days. Yes yes yes!

...

gilgamesh wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote:

Freedom2013 wrote:Nothing would please me more than seeing age 40 Wlad KO the big jackass.

But yes, Fury will lose to the first prime-aged top 10 heavyweight he fights.

Despite the fact he just clowned the lineal champ who had dominated for a decade?

Wladimir didn't fight. He didn't throw punches. A win over an opponent who didn't fight back isn't an impressive feat. No matter how accomplished they are.

Even if somebody beat Floyd Mayweather in his 50th fight. If Floyd Mayweather just came in the ring and stood there doing f*ck all for 12 rounds, I wouldn't be impressed.

Wlad couldn't fight. Fury just simply outsmarted and outboxed him leaving him utterly confused as to what to do.

Wlad is a great fighter, but he's centred his entire style around fighting people smaller than him. Facing a 6'9 boxer who kept switching his stance, has good foot movement and can hit fairly hard utterly flummoxed him.

Fury won the WBA heavyweight Super Championship by beating Wlad Klitschko who had not lost a fight in years and had beaten all comers.

Joshua won the vacant IBF title by beating Martin who beat Glaskov. IBF stripped Fury of their titles for reasons known only to themselves. I cannot see how Fury could be jealous.

Brute wrote:Fury won the WBA heavyweight Super Championship by beating Wlad Klitschko who had not lost a fight in years and had beaten all comers.

Joshua won the vacant IBF title by beating Martin who beat Glaskov. IBF stripped Fury of their titles for reasons known only to themselves. I cannot see how Fury could be jealous.

The way the media treats them?

Brute wrote:I cannot see how Fury could be jealous.

Fury is a boring boxer and feather-fisted.
Joshua is an exciting fighter and a very powerful puncher.

Fury has spent a lifetime in boxing gyms, but has no real athletic ability. He has no talent, he's just big.
Joshua just started boxing a few years ago, he's a top-notch athlete. He has real talent.

Tyson Fury was on the defensive for 12 rounds, fighting as if he was scared to death of an old, faded 40 year old.
Anthony Joshua did what top HWs are supposed to do against an opponent like Martin.

Sky doesn't want to show another boring fight with Tyson Fury.
Sky prefers to telecast Joshua's much more exciting fights.

Tyson comes across as stupid and childish.
Joshua comes across as an intelligent man.

Horse wrote:The anti-Fury nonsense on here is just dumb.

I'm just pointing out a fact when I say Wlad didn't fight. You're acting like he put on a Pernell Whitaker like defensive performance against Wlad is nuthuggery of the highest order.

It takes no defensive skill to avoid punches that aren't thrown.

davie wrote:Fury = undisputed heavyweight champion of the world and the man who beat the man

Joshua = Young unproven fighter who picked up one of Fury's scraps and has beaten a big gutless pudding in a charade labeled as a title fight.

Those who cannot see these facts, as laid out above = haters!

Nobody said Fury's not the Champion

gilgamesh wrote:

davie wrote:Fury = undisputed heavyweight champion of the world and the man who beat the man

Joshua = Young unproven fighter who picked up one of Fury's scraps and has beaten a big gutless pudding in a charade labeled as a title fight.

Those who cannot see these facts, as laid out above = haters!

Nobody said Fury's not the Champion

No, maybe they didn't but someone uttered this garbage..............

gilgamesh wrote:I hope Wlad fights next time and wins the rematch. I look forward to seeing Fury get put to sleep. If he beats Wlad twice he'll still lose to the first person he defends against that's not Wlad I figure.

Some people just don't like the guy and can't accept he is, without a sliver of doubt, the number one heavyweight on the planet until proven otherwise.

You didn't even add the disclaimer of saying "first elite heavy he defends against", you just said the first person he fights.

So he could fight Chris Arreola for his first defence, even after beating former undisputed heavyweight king Wladimir Klitschko, and in your opinion, he loses.

That's hating bro!

davie wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:

davie wrote:Fury = undisputed heavyweight champion of the world and the man who beat the man

Joshua = Young unproven fighter who picked up one of Fury's scraps and has beaten a big gutless pudding in a charade labeled as a title fight.

Those who cannot see these facts, as laid out above = haters!

Nobody said Fury's not the Champion

No, maybe they didn't but someone uttered this garbage..............

gilgamesh wrote:I hope Wlad fights next time and wins the rematch. I look forward to seeing Fury get put to sleep. If he beats Wlad twice he'll still lose to the first person he defends against that's not Wlad I figure.

Some people just don't like the guy and can't accept he is, without a sliver of doubt, the number one heavyweight on the planet until proven otherwise.

You didn't even add the disclaimer of saying "first elite heavy he defends against", you just said the first person he fights.

So he could fight Chris Arreola for his first defence, even after beating former undisputed heavyweight king Wladimir Klitschko, and in your opinion, he loses.

That's hating bro!

Granted I was assuming he'd fight somebody credible after Wlad. No I don't think he'd lose to Arreola, I also don't think he'll fight him. But yes, I don't think Fury is the #1 most talented Heavyweight right now. He is the Champ though.