Page 1 of 2
Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:25
by Horse
1. Roman Gonzalez
2. Sergey Kovalev
3. Gennady Golovkin
4. Andre Ward
5. Guillermo Rigondeaux
6. Terence Crawford
7. Saul Alvarez
8. Shinsuke Yamanaka
9. Naoya Inoue
10. Kell Brook
Brook has got to be a high level Mason or something. He's only got one win worth anything at world level.
This is almost as bad as when they had Broner in the P4P top 10 for God knows what reason.
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:30
by Crazyboy
hey mate thanks for this, your good at lists...what would yours be?
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:39
by PredatorHayds
No Uchiyama???? Ring are shocking.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:43
by Horse
Crazyboy wrote:hey mate thanks for this, your good at lists...what would yours be?
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
2. Roman Gonzalez
3. Sergey Kovalev
4. Gennady Golovkin
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Saul Alvarez
7. Tyson Fury
8. Terence Crawford
9. Timothy Bradley
10. Juan Francisco Estrada
I haven't been keeping an up-to-date World P4P ranking recently, so I might change this after having more of a think about it.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:44
by MarkMcBurney
Controversial maybe but Ward would be above Golovkin for me based on GGG's opponents so far compared to Ward's opponents. Golovkin wouldn't beat Froch IMO, Ward made him look silly.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:51
by Horse
MarkMcBurney wrote:Controversial maybe but Ward would be above Golovkin for me based on GGG's opponents so far compared to Ward's opponents. Golovkin wouldn't beat Froch IMO, Ward made him look silly.
Ward's win against Froch was over 4 years & 3 months ago.
Ward's done nothing for years.
He doesn't belong in the P4P top 10.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:53
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:MarkMcBurney wrote:Controversial maybe but Ward would be above Golovkin for me based on GGG's opponents so far compared to Ward's opponents. Golovkin wouldn't beat Froch IMO, Ward made him look silly.
Ward's win against Froch was over 4 years & 3 months ago.
Ward's done nothing for years.
He doesn't belong in the P4P top 10.
You have a man who is retired at number one though?
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:55
by Horse
Stuarty30 wrote:You have a man who is retired at number one though?
He's retired before and come back.
Why should I accept his retirement?
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:57
by CharlesListon
The Ring are now just a joke.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 09:57
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:You have a man who is retired at number one though?
He's retired before and come back.
Why should I accept his retirement?
Fair enough. But why not just take him out of the equation in the meantime? If he does come back then put him back in.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:01
by Horse
Stuarty30 wrote:Fair enough. But why not just take him out of the equation in the meantime? If he does come back then put him back in.
That's not my policy.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:05
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Fair enough. But why not just take him out of the equation in the meantime? If he does come back then put him back in.
That's not my policy.
He probably will come back so you'll probably be justified keeping him in. He's just fanny farting with all this retirement talk. Out of curiosity, how long are you going to keep him in while he's inactive/retired?
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:10
by Horse
Stuarty30 wrote:He probably will come back so you'll probably be justified keeping him in. He's just fanny farting with all this retirement talk. Out of curiosity, how long are you going to keep him in while he's inactive/retired?
At least 12 months from his last fight.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:29
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:He probably will come back so you'll probably be justified keeping him in. He's just fanny farting with all this retirement talk. Out of curiosity, how long are you going to keep him in while he's inactive/retired?
At least 12 months from his last fight.
How long was he 'retired' before he came back and fought JMM? Was it around two years? One of his best performances IMO.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:32
by Batley18
If beating an opponent the quality of Kevin Bizier is what it takes to elevate you even a place up a ranking ladder, then boxing is beyond repair.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:55
by MarkMcBurney
Horse wrote:MarkMcBurney wrote:Controversial maybe but Ward would be above Golovkin for me based on GGG's opponents so far compared to Ward's opponents. Golovkin wouldn't beat Froch IMO, Ward made him look silly.
Ward's win against Froch was over 4 years & 3 months ago.
Ward's done nothing for years.
He doesn't belong in the P4P top 10.
Correct, however Ward dominated Barrera recently and he's no mug. I think he bamboozles Kovalev too.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:59
by Horse
MarkMcBurney wrote:Correct, however Ward dominated Barrera recently and he's no mug. I think he bamboozles Kovalev too.
Barrera might be good, but he hasn't got the record to show that he is world class, so it is not a particularly good win on paper.
If Ward can bamboozle Kovalev then he might even justify a P4P No. 1 spot, but he hasn't done that yet and he may well get smashed to pieces instead.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 10:59
by MarkMcBurney
Horse wrote:MarkMcBurney wrote:Correct, however Ward dominated Barrera recently and he's no mug. I think he bamboozles Kovalev too.
Barrera might be good, but he hasn't got the record to show that he is world class, so it is not a particularly good win on paper.
If Ward can bamboozle Kovalev then he might even justify a P4P No. 1 spot, but he hasn't done that yet and he may well get smashed to pieces instead.
He may well do. Mind you, when Murray gets made to look silly by Groves, you might even drop him in your list

Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 11:05
by Horse
MarkMcBurney wrote:He may well do. Mind you, when Murray gets made to look silly by Groves, you might even drop him in your list

Is that fight even happening.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 11:12
by reggaereggae
Horse wrote:Crazyboy wrote:hey mate thanks for this, your good at lists...what would yours be?
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
2. Roman Gonzalez
3. Sergey Kovalev
4. Gennady Golovkin
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Saul Alvarez
7. Tyson Fury
8. Terence Crawford
9. Timothy Bradley
10. Juan Francisco Estrada
I haven't been keeping an up-to-date World P4P ranking recently, so I might change this after having more of a think about it.
You do realise Maywether is retired don't you?
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 11:19
by tigermoth87
Horse wrote:1. Roman Gonzalez
2. Sergey Kovalev
3. Gennady Golovkin
4. Andre Ward
5. Guillermo Rigondeaux
6. Terence Crawford
7. Saul Alvarez
8. Shinsuke Yamanaka
9. Naoya Inoue
10. Kell Brook
Brook has got to be a high level Mason or something. He's only got one win worth anything at world level.
This is almost as bad as when they had Broner in the P4P top 10 for God knows what reason.
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings
Dreadful list aside from the top 3.
Ward hasn't done anything for years.
Crawford, great fighters but hasn't fought a great opponent. Not even the best in his division imo, that credit goes to Postol.
Rigo hasn't done anything since Donaire, he deserves a spot but should be lower.
Brook has one good win and a bunch of bums.
No Tyson Fury? He beat the best and most dominant heavyweight in the world.
The lack of any cruiserweight fighters is baffling too considering it's the strongest division in boxing.
My list if any one is interested
1 - Gonzalez
2 - Kovalev
3 - GGG (Has yet to have THAT big win but he is the best in his division, guarantee)
4 - Alvarez
5 - Fury
6 - Yamanaka
7 - Pacquiao
8 - Uchiyama
9 - Rigo
10 - Glowacki
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 11:20
by Stuarty
reggaereggae wrote:Horse wrote:Crazyboy wrote:hey mate thanks for this, your good at lists...what would yours be?
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
2. Roman Gonzalez
3. Sergey Kovalev
4. Gennady Golovkin
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Saul Alvarez
7. Tyson Fury
8. Terence Crawford
9. Timothy Bradley
10. Juan Francisco Estrada
I haven't been keeping an up-to-date World P4P ranking recently, so I might change this after having more of a think about it.
You do realise Maywether is retired don't you?
He's not having it

Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 11:23
by Boxerbeetle
tigermoth87 wrote:Horse wrote:1. Roman Gonzalez
2. Sergey Kovalev
3. Gennady Golovkin
4. Andre Ward
5. Guillermo Rigondeaux
6. Terence Crawford
7. Saul Alvarez
8. Shinsuke Yamanaka
9. Naoya Inoue
10. Kell Brook
Brook has got to be a high level Mason or something. He's only got one win worth anything at world level.
This is almost as bad as when they had Broner in the P4P top 10 for God knows what reason.
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings
Dreadful list aside from the top 3.
Ward hasn't done anything for years.
Crawford, great fighters but hasn't fought a great opponent. Not even the best in his division imo, that credit goes to Postol.
Rigo hasn't done anything since Donaire, he deserves a spot but should be lower.
Brook has one good win and a bunch of bums.
No Tyson Fury? He beat the best and most dominant heavyweight in the world.
The lack of any cruiserweight fighters is baffling too considering it's the strongest division in boxing.
My list if any one is interested
1 - Gonzalez
2 - Kovalev
3 - GGG (Has yet to have THAT big win but he is the best in his division, guarantee)
4 - Alvarez
5 - Fury
6 - Yamanaka
7 - Pacquiao
8 - Uchiyama
9 - Rigo
10 - Glowacki
Cruiserweight is the strongest division in boxing? You sure?
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 11:26
by tigermoth87
Boxerbeetle wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:Horse wrote:1. Roman Gonzalez
2. Sergey Kovalev
3. Gennady Golovkin
4. Andre Ward
5. Guillermo Rigondeaux
6. Terence Crawford
7. Saul Alvarez
8. Shinsuke Yamanaka
9. Naoya Inoue
10. Kell Brook
Brook has got to be a high level Mason or something. He's only got one win worth anything at world level.
This is almost as bad as when they had Broner in the P4P top 10 for God knows what reason.
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings
Dreadful list aside from the top 3.
Ward hasn't done anything for years.
Crawford, great fighters but hasn't fought a great opponent. Not even the best in his division imo, that credit goes to Postol.
Rigo hasn't done anything since Donaire, he deserves a spot but should be lower.
Brook has one good win and a bunch of bums.
No Tyson Fury? He beat the best and most dominant heavyweight in the world.
The lack of any cruiserweight fighters is baffling too considering it's the strongest division in boxing.
My list if any one is interested
1 - Gonzalez
2 - Kovalev
3 - GGG (Has yet to have THAT big win but he is the best in his division, guarantee)
4 - Alvarez
5 - Fury
6 - Yamanaka
7 - Pacquiao
8 - Uchiyama
9 - Rigo
10 - Glowacki
Cruiserweight is the strongest division in boxing? You sure?
For me it is, loaded with some cracking fighters.
Lebedev, Glowacki, Drozd, Briedis, Huck, Makubu, Usyk... they're a bunch of cracking fighters.
Then the B-Level fighters like Ovill, Bellew, Mchunu, Afolobi, Ramirez, Durodola are good too.
Even more importantly, they are fighting each other.
Durodola is facing Briedis next.
Lebedev is unifying with Ramirez and recently faced Kayode, Kalenga and Kolodziej who are solid fighters.
Makubu and Mchunu recently fought, Makubu was going to face Drozd until the injury and I think is due to face Bellew isn't he?
Huck and Glowacki recently fought and Huck's last fight was against Ola
No ducking in the cruiserweight division. The best are fighting the best. Unlike WW where Brook, Garcia, Thurman etc are content to coast on C and D Level scrubs and avoid each other.
Re: Ring Magazine's P4P Rankings: Kell Brook enters at No 10!
Posted: 13 Apr 2016, 11:32
by ElJefe
tigermoth87 wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:
Dreadful list aside from the top 3.
Ward hasn't done anything for years.
Crawford, great fighters but hasn't fought a great opponent. Not even the best in his division imo, that credit goes to Postol.
Rigo hasn't done anything since Donaire, he deserves a spot but should be lower.
Brook has one good win and a bunch of bums.
No Tyson Fury? He beat the best and most dominant heavyweight in the world.
The lack of any cruiserweight fighters is baffling too considering it's the strongest division in boxing.
My list if any one is interested
1 - Gonzalez
2 - Kovalev
3 - GGG (Has yet to have THAT big win but he is the best in his division, guarantee)
4 - Alvarez
5 - Fury
6 - Yamanaka
7 - Pacquiao
8 - Uchiyama
9 - Rigo
10 - Glowacki
Cruiserweight is the strongest division in boxing? You sure?
For me it is, loaded with some cracking fighters.
Lebedev, Glowacki, Drozd, Briedis, Huck, Makubu, Usyk... they're a bunch of cracking fighters.
Then the B-Level fighters like Ovill, Bellew, Mchunu, Afolobi, Ramirez, Durodola are good too.
Even more importantly, they are fighting each other.
Durodola is facing Briedis next.
Lebedev is unifying with Ramirez and recently faced Kayode, Kalenga and Kolodziej who are solid fighters.
Makubu and Mchunu recently fought and I think Makubu is due to face Bellew isn't he?
Huck and Glowacki recently fought and Huck's last fight was against Ola
No ducking in the cruiserweight division. The best are fighting the best. Unlike WW where Brook, Garcia, Thurman etc are content to coast on C and D Level scrubs and avoid each other.
The cruiserweights are well matched and exciting, but are any of them really elite level boxers? Possibly Usyk, but he's still unproven.