BoxRec

HEAVYWEIGHT (Vacant)

Due to Anthony Joshua winning the IBF Heavyweight Championship, the Championship has been declared vacant. The Championship will be considered at the next meeting.

Why wait until the next meeting?

Pretty much any combo of Haye, Chisora, Price, H. Fury, Whyte or McDermott would do for the vacant title.

Put them all in eliminators and see who pulls out.

CRUISERWEIGHT

OVILL MCKENZIE (Holder)

TOMMY MCCARTHY v JON LEWIS DICKINSON

The above eliminator contest to be promoted by Eddie Hearn, will take place on Saturday, 28th May 2016 at the SSE Hydro, Glasgow. The winner to box Matthew Askin in a final eliminator contest.

McKenzie hasn't defended in over a year and the BBBofC are setting up tournaments to fight him.

He won't have defended for about two years after they've sorted his next mandatory challenger out.

LIGHTWEIGHT

SCOTT CARDLE (Holder) v KEVIN HOOPER

The Stewards decided to put out the above contest to purse bids to be submitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions attached to the Board’s Head Office by 12:00noon on Wednesday, 11th May 2016, the contest to take place by the end of August 2016.

Kevin Hooper is the mandatory?

Was no one better interested?

SUPER BANTAMWEIGHT

JAMES DICKENS (Holder)

GAMAL YAFAI v THOMAS PATRICK WARD

The Stewards decided to put out the above final eliminator contest to purse bids to be submitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions attached to the Board’s Head Office by 12:00noon on Wednesday, 11th May 2016, the contest to take place by the end of August 2016.

Hopefully this lot of fights happens.

FLYWEIGHT (Vacant)

ANDREW SELBY v LOUIS NORMAN

The above contest to be promoted by Blain McGuigan/Chris Sanigar, will take place on Saturday, 14th May 2016 at the Ice Arena Wales, Cardiff. The winner to defend against Kevin Satchell.

Kevin Satchell's the mandatory. I hope he takes it, he not done anything worth anything for a while.

http://www.bbbofc.com/content/british-c ... april-2016

The board cud have set eliminators but unless its a final eliminators or requested by a promoter the fights don't happen. Most notices have eliminators made but then have withdrawals.

Hooper was English champ and defended it. But thought Campbell wud have got the nod.

maley1984 wrote:The board cud have set eliminators but unless its a final eliminators or requested by a promoter the fights don't happen. Most notices have eliminators made but then have withdrawals.

Hooper was English champ and defended it. But thought Campbell wud have got the nod.

The rest I don't mind but Hooper getting made mandatory without winning an eliminator or doing anything to deserve it is a joke. They could have put Campbell, Coyle or Dodd in there or asked Derry Mathews if he wanted a shot. Instead they give it to Hooper who's lost to Sykes and Kays and been stopped by Walsh, but it's alright because he's managed a couple of wins for the English title. Hearn has more or less been allowed to choose the mandatory because he did a deal with Carl Greaves for Hooper to vacate so Ohara Davies could fight for the English title.

expe wrote:

maley1984 wrote:The board cud have set eliminators but unless its a final eliminators or requested by a promoter the fights don't happen. Most notices have eliminators made but then have withdrawals.

Hooper was English champ and defended it. But thought Campbell wud have got the nod.

The rest I don't mind but Hooper getting made mandatory without winning an eliminator or doing anything to deserve it is a joke. They could have put Campbell, Coyle or Dodd in there or asked Derry Mathews if he wanted a shot. Instead they give it to Hooper who's lost to Sykes and Kays and been stopped by Walsh, but it's alright because he's managed a couple of wins for the English title. Hearn has more or less been allowed to choose the mandatory because he did a deal with Carl Greaves for Hooper to vacate so Ohara Davies could fight for the English title.

Yeah i agree with you mate. I like the townend v Hughes final eliminator at super feather good fight

expe wrote:

maley1984 wrote:The board cud have set eliminators but unless its a final eliminators or requested by a promoter the fights don't happen. Most notices have eliminators made but then have withdrawals.

Hooper was English champ and defended it. But thought Campbell wud have got the nod.

The rest I don't mind but Hooper getting made mandatory without winning an eliminator or doing anything to deserve it is a joke. They could have put Campbell, Coyle or Dodd in there or asked Derry Mathews if he wanted a shot. Instead they give it to Hooper who's lost to Sykes and Kays and been stopped by Walsh, but it's alright because he's managed a couple of wins for the English title. Hearn has more or less been allowed to choose the mandatory because he did a deal with Carl Greaves for Hooper to vacate so Ohara Davies could fight for the English title.

Got to slightly disagree mate, Hoopers a decent fighter who has improved of late, agree that there are others in front of him (Campbell, Coyle etc) but did they want the British title? He was English champ, defended against Dingsdale who's no mug, whilst I'd agree that he's not the strongest ever challenger it's certainly not a 'joke'.

frankgreaves wrote:

expe wrote:

maley1984 wrote:The board cud have set eliminators but unless its a final eliminators or requested by a promoter the fights don't happen. Most notices have eliminators made but then have withdrawals.

Hooper was English champ and defended it. But thought Campbell wud have got the nod.

The rest I don't mind but Hooper getting made mandatory without winning an eliminator or doing anything to deserve it is a joke. They could have put Campbell, Coyle or Dodd in there or asked Derry Mathews if he wanted a shot. Instead they give it to Hooper who's lost to Sykes and Kays and been stopped by Walsh, but it's alright because he's managed a couple of wins for the English title. Hearn has more or less been allowed to choose the mandatory because he did a deal with Carl Greaves for Hooper to vacate so Ohara Davies could fight for the English title.

Got to slightly disagree mate, Hoopers a decent fighter who has improved of late, agree that there are others in front of him (Campbell, Coyle etc) but did they want the British title? He was English champ, defended against Dingsdale who's no mug, whilst I'd agree that he's not the strongest ever challenger it's certainly not a 'joke'.

I don't have a problem with him fighting for the title, but him being mandatory is a joke. He's lost at and below British title level in the past and hasn't won an eliminator, winning a couple of fights at area/English level doesn't mean he should even be considered to be mandatory.

Maybe Derry and Campbell wouldn't want it, but Sean Dodd definitely does and I'm sure Tommy Coyle would be well up for a British title fight too, not like he's got many other options.

frankgreaves wrote:

expe wrote:

maley1984 wrote:The board cud have set eliminators but unless its a final eliminators or requested by a promoter the fights don't happen. Most notices have eliminators made but then have withdrawals.

Hooper was English champ and defended it. But thought Campbell wud have got the nod.

The rest I don't mind but Hooper getting made mandatory without winning an eliminator or doing anything to deserve it is a joke. They could have put Campbell, Coyle or Dodd in there or asked Derry Mathews if he wanted a shot. Instead they give it to Hooper who's lost to Sykes and Kays and been stopped by Walsh, but it's alright because he's managed a couple of wins for the English title. Hearn has more or less been allowed to choose the mandatory because he did a deal with Carl Greaves for Hooper to vacate so Ohara Davies could fight for the English title.

Got to slightly disagree mate, Hoopers a decent fighter who has improved of late, agree that there are others in front of him (Campbell, Coyle etc) but did they want the British title? He was English champ, defended against Dingsdale who's no mug, whilst I'd agree that he's not the strongest ever challenger it's certainly not a 'joke'.

Campbell said he wanted the British title here

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cxCP80SC_EU


No disrespect to Hooper it's a joke because Campbell is there and that Joe Gallagher clearly wants to swerve the Campbell fight.

I can't see Haye going for the British title, Chisora maybe if he loses to Pulev. I doubt McDermott would want in either.

The real travesty isn't that Hooper has been called at Lightweight, it's that Cardle gets the Lonsdale belt for keeps when he wins that, given he could have lost to Dodd twice in a row!

MarkMcBurney wrote:The real travesty isn't that Hooper has been called at Lightweight, it's that Cardle gets the Lonsdale belt for keeps when he wins that, given he could have lost to Dodd twice in a row!

Good point.

Could it be the weakest Lonsdale Belt winning run ever?

Horse wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:The real travesty isn't that Hooper has been called at Lightweight, it's that Cardle gets the Lonsdale belt for keeps when he wins that, given he could have lost to Dodd twice in a row!

Good point.

Could it be the weakest Lonsdale Belt winning run ever?

Must be up there. More frustrating when you think of all the fighters who never got it for keeps.

When you see how well Dodd has done vs Cardle, you wonder if Buckland is reconsidering his retirement decision.

stujones wrote:When you see how well Dodd has done vs Cardle, you wonder if Buckland is reconsidering his retirement decision.

Sure I saw that he'd decided to come back about a month ago, might be wrong though.

expe wrote:Sure I saw that he'd decided to come back about a month ago, might be wrong though.

Yes, I think I can remember reading something like that.

MarkMcBurney wrote:The real travesty isn't that Hooper has been called at Lightweight, it's that Cardle gets the Lonsdale belt for keeps when he wins that, given he could have lost to Dodd twice in a row!

Cardle only has 2 title wins (Evans and Dodd 1). He needs 2 more wins to keep the Lonsdale belt outright.

roy wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:The real travesty isn't that Hooper has been called at Lightweight, it's that Cardle gets the Lonsdale belt for keeps when he wins that, given he could have lost to Dodd twice in a row!

Cardle only has 2 title wins (Evans and Dodd 1). He needs 2 more wins to keep the Lonsdale belt outright.

The draw counts as a successful defence, just needs to avoid defeat against Hooper and the belt's his.

roy wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:The real travesty isn't that Hooper has been called at Lightweight, it's that Cardle gets the Lonsdale belt for keeps when he wins that, given he could have lost to Dodd twice in a row!

Cardle only has 2 title wins (Evans and Dodd 1). He needs 2 more wins to keep the Lonsdale belt outright.

As expe says - you don't have to win, you just have to successfully defend 3 times. So it's his for keeps next time out if he avoids defeat.

I can't believe Scott has managed to defend all those times without fighting Luke Campbell , Tom Stalker or Tommy Coyle, all who I think beat him. Scott and his dad were at table next to me at St Andrews sporting with the Lonsdale belt being loud and brash right after first Dodd fight. Not my cup of tea as a fighter. Always comments on people's levels. How he's at the stage he's got to is nothing short of a miracle. Respect for getting into a ring but he's had all Cooshty defences that at the beginning he's about 10/1 fav to win