BoxRec

Nicholas Mazurek 3 0 0
vs
Randy Easton 3 8 1
Heavyweight

Mazurek won by 2nd round TKO
Easton down in round 1 but ruled a low blow
Easton down thrice in the second round for the TKO







FUll Card Highlights Here:
http://www.the13thround.com/phpBB2/view ... 8#p1684668

ENJOY!!

No offence, but his opponends are:
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (won 2 out of his 17 matches, both of them had, and still have, a 100% losing record)
... ??
Now this guy, got KOed in the first round in both of his latest two matches, only won 3 out of his 13 matches and most of his victory's were against unranked guys as well.


I admit, 4KO's in 4 fights is a good start, but I can't yet say this guy and his results are worth a topic.
This is just the typical style Americans bring up their boxers, keeping that 0 loses for about 15 to 25 fights and then start fighting someone people have actually heard of.

I guess they are getting him experience with the 3-8-1opponent .

asdfjkl wrote:No offence, but his opponends are:
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (won 2 out of his 17 matches, both of them had, and still have, a 100% losing record)
... ??
Now this guy, got KOed in the first round in both of his latest two matches, only won 3 out of his 13 matches and most of his victory's were against unranked guys as well.


I admit, 4KO's in 4 fights is a good start, but I can't yet say this guy and his results are worth a topic.
This is just the typical style Americans bring up their boxers, keeping that 0 loses for about 15 to 25 fights and then start fighting someone people have actually heard of.

Typical because most American heavies have little to no amateur experience.....whereas Euros have 150 plus amateur bouts.. They get paid to stay amateur where Americans have to work and do boxing on the side. Learns on the job so to speak.

hurricanemitch14 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:No offence, but his opponends are:
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (won 2 out of his 17 matches, both of them had, and still have, a 100% losing record)
... ??
Now this guy, got KOed in the first round in both of his latest two matches, only won 3 out of his 13 matches and most of his victory's were against unranked guys as well.


I admit, 4KO's in 4 fights is a good start, but I can't yet say this guy and his results are worth a topic.
This is just the typical style Americans bring up their boxers, keeping that 0 loses for about 15 to 25 fights and then start fighting someone people have actually heard of.

Typical because most American heavies have little to no amateur experience.....whereas Euros have 150 plus amateur bouts.. They get paid to stay amateur where Americans have to work and do boxing on the side. Learns on the job so to speak.

To my sense of geography Europe ends at the Ural mountain range. Sans British fighters most Western European fighters are even worse than the American Heavyweights, now Eastern European and Central Asian Heavyweights that a whole different ball of wax, in the Eastern part of Europe you have a lot more economic deprivation so a lot more motivated fighters with strong foundations in Amateur boxing.

I wouldn't call most heavyweights with that type of records prospects... but Mazurek is not only doing his job, but he is also showing promising skills for a man that size. So far i've been impressed on how he did it.

Most of the time, a Boxrec sheet won't tell you everything... watching fighters is needed. at least when judging of the potential.

victor-romeo wrote:

hurricanemitch14 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:No offence, but his opponends are:
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (100% losing record, all lost by KO, while all his opponends were unranked as well)
unranked (won 2 out of his 17 matches, both of them had, and still have, a 100% losing record)
... ??
Now this guy, got KOed in the first round in both of his latest two matches, only won 3 out of his 13 matches and most of his victory's were against unranked guys as well.


I admit, 4KO's in 4 fights is a good start, but I can't yet say this guy and his results are worth a topic.
This is just the typical style Americans bring up their boxers, keeping that 0 loses for about 15 to 25 fights and then start fighting someone people have actually heard of.

Typical because most American heavies have little to no amateur experience.....whereas Euros have 150 plus amateur bouts.. They get paid to stay amateur where Americans have to work and do boxing on the side. Learns on the job so to speak.

To my sense of geography Europe ends at the Ural mountain range. Sans British fighters most Western European fighters are even worse than the American Heavyweights, now Eastern European and Central Asian Heavyweights that a whole different ball of wax, in the Eastern part of Europe you have a lot more economic deprivation so a lot more motivated fighters with strong foundations in Amateur boxing.

True I was just thinking of the top Euro heavies at the moment. They had very strong amateur creds, but yes they are raised hard and they grow up hungry and hard.

TheBeast wrote:I wouldn't call most heavyweights with that type of records prospects... but Mazurek is not only doing his job, but he is also showing promising skills for a man that size. So far i've been impressed on how he did it.

Most of the time, a Boxrec sheet won't tell you everything... watching fighters is needed. at least when judging of the potential.

I haven't seen him boxing, but can you make an attempt to predict where his limit probably is? A boxrec top 100? Top 50? Top 10?

TheBeast wrote:I wouldn't call most heavyweights with that type of records prospects... but Mazurek is not only doing his job, but he is also showing promising skills for a man that size. So far i've been impressed on how he did it.

Most of the time, a Boxrec sheet won't tell you everything... watching fighters is needed. at least when judging of the potential.

And what size is he?

Cut the guy some slack he's 21.