Light Middles.
Posted: 17 Jul 2004, 09:37
Well I know this topic has been discussed extensively, but I am adding a little spin on it which I think might cause a discussion.
We all know that a few years ago, the Light Middles where hyped up as being our best devision with about 5 of 6 fighters apparently on the fringes of world class and with the potential of Neil Sinclair possibly adding to that list. We all know that Roberts, Williams, Takaloo, Farnell, Lockett, Alexander, and Jones were all looked as potential world contendors and the likes of Dixon, Moore, McDonagh, Samuels, Logan and Macklin considered very strong domestic level fighters.
All that has changed of course, but looking at the recent performances of these Light Middles I am now thinking is light middleweight one of our WORST devision in terms of talent. Like our heavyweight there it can still be a potentially exciting devision because the fighters are still close to each other - but I think there many devision in which the top fighters have more of a chance of making the grade at a higher level.
Takaloo has been exposed by a solid but limited fighter, Williams might not ever return after getting a pasting by Martinez, Alexander exposed, Moore got humilated by again another limited fighter, Jones beaten by Moore.
We are on about them fighting each other and indeed it is now the only way forward - I can't see any of them reaching European level, let alone any further. It is quite possible now that the best of the bunch is McDonagh, which is saying something for the talent of the rest of them.
There are not many other devisions (infact only Heavyweight) in which there are a no fighters capable of reaching European title level. Infact, given the global lack of depth in the Heavyweight devision, I would say there is more of a chance of Skelton, Sprott, Williams, and Harrison reaching a higher level than the light middleweight boys.
So whilst there is no doubt there is a good depth of similar level fighters, I believe Light Middleweight is our worst devision in terms of talent - anyone prepared to discuss.
We all know that a few years ago, the Light Middles where hyped up as being our best devision with about 5 of 6 fighters apparently on the fringes of world class and with the potential of Neil Sinclair possibly adding to that list. We all know that Roberts, Williams, Takaloo, Farnell, Lockett, Alexander, and Jones were all looked as potential world contendors and the likes of Dixon, Moore, McDonagh, Samuels, Logan and Macklin considered very strong domestic level fighters.
All that has changed of course, but looking at the recent performances of these Light Middles I am now thinking is light middleweight one of our WORST devision in terms of talent. Like our heavyweight there it can still be a potentially exciting devision because the fighters are still close to each other - but I think there many devision in which the top fighters have more of a chance of making the grade at a higher level.
Takaloo has been exposed by a solid but limited fighter, Williams might not ever return after getting a pasting by Martinez, Alexander exposed, Moore got humilated by again another limited fighter, Jones beaten by Moore.
We are on about them fighting each other and indeed it is now the only way forward - I can't see any of them reaching European level, let alone any further. It is quite possible now that the best of the bunch is McDonagh, which is saying something for the talent of the rest of them.
There are not many other devisions (infact only Heavyweight) in which there are a no fighters capable of reaching European title level. Infact, given the global lack of depth in the Heavyweight devision, I would say there is more of a chance of Skelton, Sprott, Williams, and Harrison reaching a higher level than the light middleweight boys.
So whilst there is no doubt there is a good depth of similar level fighters, I believe Light Middleweight is our worst devision in terms of talent - anyone prepared to discuss.