Page 1 of 1

Moloney Brothers

Posted: 20 May 2016, 23:52
by Taansend
Pair of undefeated twins fighting out of Melbourne. Anyone got any background info on them?

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 23 May 2016, 22:56
by ClivePatrickLyons
Both boy's will prove over the next couple of year's that they are World Class great team behind them in Brian Butler and Co. :TU:

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 24 May 2016, 00:26
by Taansend
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Both boy's will prove over the next couple of year's that they are World Class great team behind them in Brian Butler and Co. :TU:
Cheers Clive. Certainly impressive so far.

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Jun 2016, 09:24
by The Raw Prawn
Just got a chance to watch the card from 20/5/16 in Melbourne.
The Moloney twins showed some good skills against their [limited] Argentine opponents.
They're making good progress in the pros.The brothers are fighting again in Melbourne 24/6/16

Hero Tito looked to be on the wrong end of some pretty ordinary scoring in his bout with Tomlinson.
The judges had it 97-93 97-93 95-95 for Tomlinson.
Tito looked like a comfortable winner to me.

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13
by Taansend
The Raw Prawn wrote:Just got a chance to watch the card from 20/5/16 in Melbourne.
The Moloney twins showed some good skills against their [limited] Argentine opponents.
They're making good progress in the pros.The brothers are fighting again in Melbourne 24/6/16

Hero Tito looked to be on the wrong end of some pretty ordinary scoring in his bout with Tomlinson.
The judges had it 97-93 97-93 95-95 for Tomlinson.
Tito looked like a comfortable winner to me.
Thanks Prawn.

I'll buy you a beer when I'm next in Oz

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Jun 2016, 23:44
by DA GOOSE
The Raw Prawn wrote:Just got a chance to watch the card from 20/5/16 in Melbourne.
The Moloney twins showed some good skills against their [limited] Argentine opponents.
They're making good progress in the pros.The brothers are fighting again in Melbourne 24/6/16

Hero Tito looked to be on the wrong end of some pretty ordinary scoring in his bout with Tomlinson.
The judges had it 97-93 97-93 95-95 for Tomlinson.
Tito looked like a comfortable winner to me.
Really? I thought when will boxed and moved he looked good which was most rounds I agree Tito landed the more hurtful,meaningful punches when Will was in range. I thought Will nicked it myself. Agree the Moloney bros. looked good.

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 11 Jun 2016, 00:23
by bogan whisperer
The Raw Prawn wrote:Just got a chance to watch the card from 20/5/16 in Melbourne.
The Moloney twins showed some good skills against their [limited] Argentine opponents.
They're making good progress in the pros.The brothers are fighting again in Melbourne 24/6/16

Hero Tito looked to be on the wrong end of some pretty ordinary scoring in his bout with Tomlinson.
The judges had it 97-93 97-93 95-95 for Tomlinson.
Tito looked like a comfortable winner to me.
Tomlinson looked ordinary in one of his other recent fights and was very lucky to get the win from the judges.

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 11 Jun 2016, 01:51
by The Raw Prawn
You're right Whisperer, same venue in Melbourne August 2015 was Tomlinson's previous outing.
He fought a very good Filo , Adones Aguelo over 10 rds.
I had the first round a draw with Aguelo winning the next nine.
The commentary team of Hadley Mundine and Dib all had Aguelo winning the fight.

Were the judges incompetent or on the take ?
Either way it was a disgrace. Two of these judges were backing up on the Tito fight.

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 18 Jul 2016, 01:32
by Like a Boss
Jason is now WBA #14 :

Image

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 04 Aug 2016, 01:14
by Like a Boss
Winner are grinners :

Image

Both Moloney's now 9-0.

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 06 Aug 2016, 01:21
by colin russell
We will see how good they are if they ever step up and fight some good fighters. You cant play boxing it will only catch up on you with a bang :doh:

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 02:47
by ClivePatrickLyons
Both fighter's have been moved along smartly since turning pro both have been in with fighter's with winning record's and both have given away experience to opponent's.......... You cannot just throw them in with fighter's that they are not ready for......... They have both had under 10 pro fight's both are still unbeaten........ In Jason 3rd fight he fought a fighter with a 14-4 record Andrew in every fight so far except 1 has giving away experience and both know what game they are playing i'd imagine :TU:

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 05:39
by colin russell
Yes there oponions records are ok but if you check who they have fought ( there oponionts ) you will see why I made these comments also they make there oponionts lose weight or fight at the next weight up. Time will tell

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 06:45
by coneye
Its a hard one ,, bring them along slow , look for the right fights , gain the experience , ect ect ect .. But does it do them any good when realisticly they , fight guys they would of beat even if they were still ameteurs ,,

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 06:51
by littlepug
coneye wrote:Its a hard one ,, bring them along slow , look for the right fights , gain the experience , ect ect ect .. But does it do them any good when realisticly they , fight guys they would of beat even if they were still ameteurs ,,
its location that's the problem, only so many homegrown lads to feast on and the danger of bringing in the Asian lads is they are either really crap or really good and you cant always tell by looking at their records, so spend money on decent opponents or get on the road

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 08:11
by Like a Boss
coneye wrote:Its a hard one ,, bring them along slow , look for the right fights , gain the experience , ect ect ect .. But does it do them any good when realisticly they , fight guys they would of beat even if they were still ameteurs ,,
It is a hard one. Years ago you could take more risks because losses were less frowned upon. But these days you drop a fight or two and you are going nowhere fast.

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 11 Aug 2016, 00:22
by ClivePatrickLyons
colin russell wrote:Yes there oponions records are ok but if you check who they have fought ( there oponionts ) you will see why I made these comments also they make there oponionts lose weight or fight at the next weight up. Time will tell

Mate that's right its the case with every aspiring star :TU: time will tell.......... But if these 2 young men were my son's i'd be happy with the job that Brian Butler and his team have done. :TU:

Re: Moloney Brothers

Posted: 11 Aug 2016, 02:45
by ClivePatrickLyons
coneye wrote:Its a hard one ,, bring them along slow , look for the right fights , gain the experience , ect ect ect .. But does it do them any good when realisticly they , fight guys they would of beat even if they were still ameteurs ,,


Ali could have beat his 1st pro opponent Tunney Hunsaker drunk on moonshine let alone in the Amateur's so he should not have fought him TBE Floyd Mayweathers 2nd pro opponent in Reggie Sanders record was 1-1 TBE won a 4rd un dec one judge even had Sanders WINNING a round the first man to win a round against TBE in the pro's did he have any right being in the ring with TBE De La Hoya 1st opponent record was 5-1-1 in Lamar Williams 2 fight's earlier Lamar lost to a fighter with a win/loss record 7-35 Oscar would have beat him when he was 10 :lol: Sugar Shane Moseley 2nd opponent record was 0-1 his 7th opponent record was 1-3 Sugar Shanes 13th opponent's record was 8-7-2 and there are plenty of other fighter's in the same boat when still in the early part of their career's learning and gaining Professional experience and improving they know their not world beater's yet that's what the goal is down the track.............That's a harsh statement ''coneye''