WHO WINS? Tyson Fury vs. David Haye
Posted: 21 May 2016, 17:23
if the fight were made today, who wins?
He'd never do something like that.gilgamesh wrote:Hate 'em both, but Fury would win.
Haye would likely fake an injury before getting into the ring with him though.
I assume you're joking seeing as how he's already done it 3 or 4 times before.BitPlayer wrote:He'd never do something like that.gilgamesh wrote:Hate 'em both, but Fury would win.
Haye would likely fake an injury before getting into the ring with him though.
Yeah and he cut himself and faked surgery. Stop talking sh1te man.ThereByTheGrace wrote:Big man would smash him into next week, and Haye knows it, thats why the fight was called off twice before.
I'd assume he is.gilgamesh wrote:I assume you're joking seeing as how he's already done it 3 or 4 times before.BitPlayer wrote:He'd never do something like that.gilgamesh wrote:Hate 'em both, but Fury would win.
Haye would likely fake an injury before getting into the ring with him though.
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I believed Haye would muller him previously, and I still think he has the tools to beat Fury, obviously hard to guage when he fights tulips like Garglebox, but Haye is quick and hits hard, and I have no doubt he has the power to finish Fury.
Wlad was too controlled and cagey for Haye to get near, and Haye was rightly very wary of his power, I think Haye would be able to exploit weaknesses in Fury and would gamble on taking a few to get close. Fury is much wider open when he throws shots, as he doesn't control distance as well.
Very true. There's obviously a reason he's fighting guys like that twat last night and De Mori. Bloody Briggs next as well! He's fighting guys who shouldn't be in the same ring as him and he's obviously building towards a pay day then he'll wrap it.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hard to guage what Haye has left fighting patsies like garglebox, if he is pushed a bit harder in a contest, would be possible to answer the question, right now, who knows.
Yep, simple as that. He will con the public and casuals but not real boxing fans who have become jaded by it all and can see through the BS. But then, we are small in number so it makes no difference to the end result. It will fool people and it will sellStuarty30 wrote:Very true. There's obviously a reason he's fighting guys like that twat last night and De Mori. Bloody Briggs next as well! He's fighting guys who shouldn't be in the same ring as him and he's obviously building towards a pay day then he'll wrap it.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hard to guage what Haye has left fighting patsies like garglebox, if he is pushed a bit harder in a contest, would be possible to answer the question, right now, who knows.
He's coming back after 3 years and major shoulder surgery, so he's easing his way back in. It has absolutely nothing to do with cashing out, it's about achievement.tobyh5 wrote:Yep, simple as that. He will con the public and casuals but not real boxing fans who have become jaded by it all and can see through the BS. But then, we are small in number so it makes no difference to the end result. It will fool people and it will sellStuarty30 wrote:Very true. There's obviously a reason he's fighting guys like that twat last night and De Mori. Bloody Briggs next as well! He's fighting guys who shouldn't be in the same ring as him and he's obviously building towards a pay day then he'll wrap it.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hard to guage what Haye has left fighting patsies like garglebox, if he is pushed a bit harder in a contest, would be possible to answer the question, right now, who knows.
And what is he 'achieving' while he's 'easing' his way back in?keithmoonhangover wrote:He's coming back after 3 years and major shoulder surgery, so he's easing his way back in. It has absolutely nothing to do with cashing out, it's about achievement.tobyh5 wrote:Yep, simple as that. He will con the public and casuals but not real boxing fans who have become jaded by it all and can see through the BS. But then, we are small in number so it makes no difference to the end result. It will fool people and it will sellStuarty30 wrote:
Very true. There's obviously a reason he's fighting guys like that twat last night and De Mori. Bloody Briggs next as well! He's fighting guys who shouldn't be in the same ring as him and he's obviously building towards a pay day then he'll wrap it.
The same thing Tyson did against McNeeley or Bruno did against Emmen. He's getting back in the ring against inferior opponents while he rebuilds. It's only a matter of time before he fights Joshua or Wilder or Fury.Stuarty30 wrote:And what is he 'achieving' while he's 'easing' his way back in?keithmoonhangover wrote:He's coming back after 3 years and major shoulder surgery, so he's easing his way back in. It has absolutely nothing to do with cashing out, it's about achievement.tobyh5 wrote:
Yep, simple as that. He will con the public and casuals but not real boxing fans who have become jaded by it all and can see through the BS. But then, we are small in number so it makes no difference to the end result. It will fool people and it will sell
That's fair enough, but it's not what David himself said.keithmoonhangover wrote:The same thing Tyson did against McNeeley or Bruno did against Emmen. He's getting back in the ring against inferior opponents while he rebuilds. It's only a matter of time before he fights Joshua or Wilder or Fury.Stuarty30 wrote:And what is he 'achieving' while he's 'easing' his way back in?keithmoonhangover wrote:
He's coming back after 3 years and major shoulder surgery, so he's easing his way back in. It has absolutely nothing to do with cashing out, it's about achievement.
Last nights opponent was rated higher than DeMori by BoxRec, so it's a step up, although still a small one. Yes Briggs is old, but it's a fight that a lot of people want to see. It's gentle steps, but why not? Why not take his time? It's his career on the line, so he needs to do what's best for him.Syntax Error wrote:That's fair enough, but it's not what David himself said.keithmoonhangover wrote:The same thing Tyson did against McNeeley or Bruno did against Emmen. He's getting back in the ring against inferior opponents while he rebuilds. It's only a matter of time before he fights Joshua or Wilder or Fury.Stuarty30 wrote:
And what is he 'achieving' while he's 'easing' his way back in?
After he put paid to Mark de Waxworkdummy, he said he needed to step in class for his next fight, so then he goes out chooses another daffodil to knock over & tries to justify it by saying he was undefeated!![]()
Andrew Flintoff is undefeated too!
Now, he's planning to take on Shannon Briggs, who is older than space itself.![]()
If he told us all what he was really doing, there'd be no complaints from me.
This^ to a TRexob wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:I believed Haye would muller him previously, and I still think he has the tools to beat Fury, obviously hard to guage when he fights tulips like Garglebox, but Haye is quick and hits hard, and I have no doubt he has the power to finish Fury.
Wlad was too controlled and cagey for Haye to get near, and Haye was rightly very wary of his power, I think Haye would be able to exploit weaknesses in Fury and would gamble on taking a few to get close. Fury is much wider open when he throws shots, as he doesn't control distance as well.
I think Fury has become a master at controlling his distance.