Page 1 of 4

fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 13:01
by JimJim2009
It is beyond a joke now, with 42 year old fana facing terry next month. Nobody in the uk is importing more inept world title challengers than fwank - look at the nobody Liam smith faces this weekend, and the guy lined up for BJS before that fight got scrapped. Somebody close to fwank needs to have a word, as world title challengers these guys aren't just bad they are awful. It's almost like he wants to make his channel more obscure and widen the gap with matchroom even further. He bangs on about making the fights the fans want to see but what he delivers for his world champs is a joke.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 13:18
by Horse
I agree.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 13:28
by Black Sam Bellamy
No mainstream cross-over exposure means no ticket sales means no money in the pot for quality opponents.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 13:37
by Stuarty
Fana? Seriously? Ffs! I didn't even realise he was still going. Frank has been the same for years. Some of Calzaghes defences years ago were a piss take as well.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 13:50
by Old bones Ian
Fana is something like 4-4 as a lightweight, no way should he be fighting for a world title again. Why do fans buy tickets to this?

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 14:09
by wesshaw1985
does W@rren have a match maker or does he do it all himself?

BJS vs. Bursak
Smith vs. Radosevic
Flanagan vs. Fana
pointless, no hype, no eyeballs.

3 things - get English-speaking opponents to build a little hype and/or get fighters coming off competitive fights on sky sports and/or get old named opponents.

alternative opponents for what I'm guessing would be comparative money -
BJS vs. Jorge Heiland (beat Macklin on Sky TV)
Smith vs. Carson Jones (beat Brian Rose on Sky TV)
Flanagan vs. Yvan Mendy (beat Luke Campbell on a Sky PPV)

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 14:23
by jameswilson
He's tough. He's game. He'll come to win.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 14:34
by Counter-puncher
jameswilson wrote:He's tough. He's game. He'll come to win.
You can't buy that kind of experience

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 14:40
by ElJefe
jameswilson wrote:He's tough. He's game. He'll come to win.
He's not just tough, mate. He's African remember. That automatically puts him in the "teak tough" group of British commentator/pundit clichés.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 14:41
by CMDY
wesshaw1985 wrote:does W@rren have a match maker or does he do it all himself?

BJS vs. Bursak
Smith vs. Radosevic
Flanagan vs. Fana
pointless, no hype, no eyeballs.

3 things - get English-speaking opponents to build a little hype and/or get fighters coming off competitive fights on sky sports and/or get old named opponents.

alternative opponents for what I'm guessing would be comparative money -
BJS vs. Jorge Heiland (beat Macklin on Sky TV)
Smith vs. Carson Jones (beat Brian Rose on Sky TV)
Flanagan vs. Yvan Mendy (beat Luke Campbell on a Sky PPV)
Good calls.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 15:20
by JimJim2009
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:No mainstream cross-over exposure means no ticket sales means no money in the pot for quality opponents.
Agreed, but it's a dangerous downward spiral of quality and it's a bit sad to see a former top promoter putting on a world title fight involving fana in 2016. No doubt fwank will soon pop up on ifilm slagging off matchroom and putting the boot in on Joshua's opponent.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 15:36
by Autobarn
I thought they reserved "teak tough" for Ghanaians.

Yeah this is very bad. I couldn't watch most of FW's challengers for Calzaghe, Maccarinelli, Hatton (WBU), Gary Lockett (WBU) back when I spent a lot of money on Sky Sports.

Fana was destroyed some 7 years ago by Barrera down at super feather, in only a couple of rounds.

Meanwhile Crolla is coming off destructions of Barroso, Perez and could be heading toward unification with Linares...

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 15:53
by bfchunk
Image
Image

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 16:43
by JimJim2009
Not sure how long the current deal lasts but I bet terry is wishing he was a matchroom fighter.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 16:45
by handsofstone
Couldnt Fwank have brought over Andreas Evensen? Surely he's a LW these days

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 17:04
by Stevieb8006
bfchunk wrote:Image
Image
Enzo used to have a fair pair of tits on him, but he seems to have lost them as he's got older. In stark contrast to myself.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:14
by keirw
I'm racking my brains a bit trying to remember the last time a British world title holder had a genuinely dangerous voluntary defence.

The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Burns vs Beltran and Cleverly vs Kovalev and they were both a couple years ago.

Obviously Fury vs Klitchsko is coming up too, but they seem to be few and far between.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:18
by black panther
Autobarn wrote:I thought they reserved "teak tough" for Ghanaians.

Yeah this is very bad. I couldn't watch most of FW's challengers for Calzaghe, Maccarinelli, Hatton (WBU), Gary Lockett (WBU) back when I spent a lot of money on Sky Sports.

Fana was destroyed some 7 years ago by Barrera down at super feather, in only a couple of rounds.

Meanwhile Crolla is coming off destructions of Barroso, Perez and could be heading toward unification with Linares...
Good post. To add even more emphasis to your point, it was in 2005 (eleven years ago) that Fana was destroyed by a past it Barrera.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:18
by Autobarn
Is that Calzaghe-Pudwill and Maccarinelli-Lamontagne?

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:20
by Autobarn
black panther wrote:
Autobarn wrote:I thought they reserved "teak tough" for Ghanaians.

Yeah this is very bad. I couldn't watch most of FW's challengers for Calzaghe, Maccarinelli, Hatton (WBU), Gary Lockett (WBU) back when I spent a lot of money on Sky Sports.

Fana was destroyed some 7 years ago by Barrera down at super feather, in only a couple of rounds.

Meanwhile Crolla is coming off destructions of Barroso, Perez and could be heading toward unification with Linares...
Good post. To add even more emphasis to your point, it was in 2005 (eleven years ago) that Fana was destroyed by a past it Barrera.
I think Barrera still had something. But it was the last gasp of his career.

11 years since Fana was brutally exposed, wow.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:21
by JimJim2009
keirw wrote:I'm racking my brains a bit trying to remember the last time a British world title holder had a genuinely dangerous voluntary defence.

The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Burns vs Beltran and Cleverly vs Kovalev and they were both a couple years ago.

Obviously Fury vs Klitchsko is coming up too, but they seem to be few and far between.
Good point. I would class fana as barely acceptable for an inter continental title fight, given his advanced years. To put him in with Flanaghan is inexcusable. Standards have declined in recent years but Jesus Christ this is a new low. Has there ever been a lightweight title challenger in his 40's ? Fana turns 43 soon after the fight. I would like to see kugan ask a few blunt questions of fwank, next time he is harping on about how old Shannon Briggs is or how crap the opposition is for kell and Joshua.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:25
by Autobarn
keirw wrote:I'm racking my brains a bit trying to remember the last time a British world title holder had a genuinely dangerous voluntary defence.

The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Burns vs Beltran and Cleverly vs Kovalev and they were both a couple years ago.

Obviously Fury vs Klitchsko is coming up too, but they seem to be few and far between.
Naz, Lennox and Froch would have several consecutive hard fights vs dangerous fighters.

Froch v Taylor was a good voluntary. Froch demanded the fight of his top contender and was ridiculed for calling out the better known fighter. Froch's last ditch rally was one of my absolute favourite boxing moments.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:27
by crusader
Wasn't Taylor Froch's mandatory?

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 01 Jun 2016, 18:39
by jameswilson
crusader wrote:Wasn't Taylor Froch's mandatory?
Yes I'm sure I vividly remember the WBC at the time adding a rule that meant winners of vacant titles had to fight 2 consecutive mandatories.

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Posted: 02 Jun 2016, 00:12
by CaptainSpacerod
Autobarn wrote: Froch's last ditch rally was one of my absolute favourite boxing moments.
Fantastic never to be forgotten finish. I was leaping round the living room like a madman.