Page 1 of 1

Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 08:30
by Taansend
Undercard of the Warrington bout in Leeds.

Tough fight for Campbell?

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 08:31
by PredatorHayds
Good fight for Campbell and his best opponent to date.
Got a feeling Mendez has just started lacking ambition though and is developing a journeyman attitude.
Campbell on points for me.

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 09:03
by AGM
Very tough fight fair play to Campbell

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 10:17
by daviddee
Journeymen he lost his last fight to a guy who is touted to be the next big thing. Fight before he beat vasquez this is brave matching. Who is training mendes now? Im guessing its not Lee Beard. Only reason i lean towards Campbell is Mendes is more of a super feather. I think campbell belongs at light welter

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 12:48
by handsofstone
Yeah good fight for Campbell and near as good the Mandy rematch,Mendez got blitzed early from Barthelemy although he's usually durable and that result was changed to a NC after it was deemed the punch came after the bell

Still i wouldnt be surprised to see Luke take him out early with the bigger weight

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 14:06
by Boxing Prospect
daviddee wrote:Journeymen he lost his last fight to a guy who is touted to be the next big thing. Fight before he beat vasquez this is brave matching. Who is training mendes now? Im guessing its not Lee Beard. Only reason i lean towards Campbell is Mendes is more of a super feather. I think campbell belongs at light welter
Journeyman is a bit harsh but in reality the guy could easily have gone 1-5 in his last 6 (with losses to Usmanee, Barthelemy-twice, Vazquez and Easter), he's had his rub of luck in regards to the judging...

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 14:27
by crusader
PredatorHayds wrote:Good fight for Campbell and his best opponent to date.
Got a feeling Mendez has just started lacking ambition though and is developing a journeyman attitude.
Campbell on points for me.
Ya, it seems to me like they've got Mendez at the right time.

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 14:41
by brilo33
cant recall Mendez but looking at his record only lost to good fighters, luke needs a good win on his record and start fighting solid fighters

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 19 Jun 2016, 07:36
by Stuarty
I quite like this fight. Best opponent (Mendy aside) to date. If he can pick up a good win coupled with a good performance here I'd like to see him fight Cardle for the British then try and avenge the Mendy loss in December if possible. That would set him up for a promising 2017. He's 29 this year so I'd like to see him moved on a bit quicker.

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 19 Jun 2016, 14:40
by Furey
Stuarty30 wrote:I quite like this fight. Best opponent (Mendy aside) to date. If he can pick up a good win coupled with a good performance here I'd like to see him fight Cardle for the British then try and avenge the Mendy loss in December if possible. That would set him up for a promising 2017. He's 29 this year so I'd like to see him moved on a bit quicker.
Yeah I agree.

Solid fight this and should he get through, hopefully looking good in the process, I would like to see him back in with Mendy to re-write the wrong. I think he would wipe the floor with Cardle to be honest, depends on what he wants to do... hang around for the British or look to fast track himself to bigger things, as you mention he is 29 now so he needs to make moves.

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 20 Jun 2016, 08:47
by olij999
Sensible matchmaking - but after the Sykes comeback, I hope Campbell facing former super-feathers is not going to become a habit. Mendez could probably still make super-feather, and in some of his super-feather eliminators and title fights was nearer the 126 limit than 130 (127-odd in Salgado I, same in Honorio II) - he was also well under 130 on other occasions (e.g 128-odd in Barthelemy I). Hardly someone who looked tight at 130.

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 20 Jun 2016, 12:00
by Horse
Why is Campbell not fighting Cardle?

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 20 Jun 2016, 13:35
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:Why is Campbell not fighting Cardle?
I'm not 100% but I think the BBBoC made Kevin Hooper the mandatory for Cardles British title for whatever reason. Madness if you ask me!

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 20 Jun 2016, 13:40
by Horse
Stuarty30 wrote:I'm not 100% but I think the BBBoC made Kevin Hooper the mandatory for Cardles British title for whatever reason. Madness if you ask me!
That rings a nutty bell.

Ridiculous.

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 20 Jun 2016, 14:48
by maley1984
Stuarty30 wrote:
Horse wrote:Why is Campbell not fighting Cardle?
I'm not 100% but I think the BBBoC made Kevin Hooper the mandatory for Cardles British title for whatever reason. Madness if you ask me!

Hearn done a deal and was approved by the board for hooper to drop English for ohara Davis to fight for and hooper fighting winner of cardle dodd. Date to set on next notices

Re: Luke Campbell v Argenis Mendez

Posted: 20 Jun 2016, 14:51
by Stuarty
maley1984 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Horse wrote:Why is Campbell not fighting Cardle?
I'm not 100% but I think the BBBoC made Kevin Hooper the mandatory for Cardles British title for whatever reason. Madness if you ask me!

Hearn done a deal and was approved by the board for hooper to drop English for ohara Davis to fight for and hooper fighting winner of cardle dodd. Date to set on next notices
I see. Davies could've probably had just went straight for the British since fast Eddie was doing deals. Maybe Davies vs Cardle later in the year then? Maybe Campbell will just skip going for the British title.