BoxRec

how do you guys see it?

thurman showed some patience, improved, controlled, dude is right now in his prime, so is spence. spence looks as strong as thurman, but with more fluid footwork. but, thurman neck looks stronger than spences, i think he can better absorb a shot. spence looks a bit skinny and would be interresting how he would react to a top ww puncher punchign him.

all in all, spence to athletic, to well rounded, beats thurman ud. spence is the best, no ww beats him.

2 of the best in the world but I'll go Spence. He's special.

he realy is. you rarely get a boxer who is special in like 2+ edpartmants, athletiscm check, power check etc

I think Spence is limited in certain areas but his come forward southpaw style (we saw how how uncomfortable Keith was when Collazo and Guerrero adopted that approach) would be a bad style match up for Keith. Thurman is more comfortable when he can box at range. I think Spence should go after Brook first anyway.

lefty wrote:I think Spence is limited in certain areas but his come forward southpaw style (we saw how how uncomfortable Keith was when Collazo and Guerrero adopted that approach) would be a bad style match up for Keith. Thurman is more comfortable when he can box at range. I think Spence should go after Brook first anyway.

yeah because that would be than be like a mega fight, thurman beating porter, spence beating arguably the second best ww in the world and if spence wins, both mett each other