Page 1 of 1

Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 06:01
by markhdunlop
For everyone contacting me regarding Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts for the Scottish Super Featherweight Title, we were informed yesterday through MGM Scotland (who also wanted the fight) that M R Jnr is a fully fledged featherweight and would not be taking up the challenge. personally I am very disappointed in this rejection by M R Snr, as everyone keeps pointing out the 29 year old Roberts Jnr has never done 9st in 19 fights. The Tartan Spartan that is Ronnie "The Shark" Clark offered a catch weight of 9-2 Roberts lightest however this again was rejected. If feel sorry for Jnr, he really has limited options now of testing himself. 9st would kill him, I know I made the mistake of trying to boil James Tennyson to that weight despite growing 2" in height in a year. We live and learn. Any views appreciated. Mark Dunlop

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 06:13
by Stuarty
Looks to me like a duck. No other explanation for it as far as I can see. Roberts has been a pro 6 years has had 19/20 fights and not one of they fights has been a meaningful contest in terms of competition. Here he's being offered a big fight and probably decent purse but they turn it down? What alternative plans do they have for him and what direction are they intending to take him? He won't get anywhere near British level at feather. I'd bet my weeks wages his next fight will be against another journeyman type. If he's not ready now he never will be. It's his career and if he wants to continue fighting mediocre opponents and not testing himself then that's up to him. He won't improve continuing to fight this calibre of opposition.

I feel sorry for Clark. He seems the type that will take on anyone. Hopefully his team find him a good opponent. Maybe an eliminator?

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 06:26
by markhdunlop
Thanks, he already has an eliminator under his belt in his last fight. His time will come. As for Roberts it is what it is.

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 06:27
by Stuarty
markhdunlop wrote:Thanks, he already has an eliminator under his belt in his last fight. His time will come. As for Roberts it is what it is.
Have they sparred before Mark?

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 06:51
by markhdunlop
I imagine so, Ronnie would help anyone out. A spar is a spar and a fight is just that.

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 07:35
by Stuarty
markhdunlop wrote:I imagine so, Ronnie would help anyone out. A spar is a spar and a fight is just that.
Was just wondering if they'd perhaps sparred and that's maybe the reason Roberts doesn't fancy it is all...

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 07:38
by JamieM
Shock....

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 08:01
by bripez
I know nothing of Scottish boxing, but that Roberts fella needs to either shite or get off the pot.

What is his plan - get to 50-0 without facing a meaningful opponent or challenge for any titles ?

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 08:04
by DanielGraham73
Never seen that 1 coming....

Roberts Snr is the equivalent to the Eubank Snr of Scottish Boxing,I could imagine Sam Kynoch pulling out his hair :OhYes: :OhYes:

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 11:21
by daviddee
Stuarty30 wrote:
markhdunlop wrote:I imagine so, Ronnie would help anyone out. A spar is a spar and a fight is just that.
Was just wondering if they'd perhaps sparred and that's maybe the reason Roberts doesn't fancy it is all...
They did spar I was there.. I think sparring is different to a fight although it does get in some fighters heads.. Some fighters are delusional and think they win every spar. I can promise Ronnie is the opposite very hard on himself..He has came out before saying he was terrible when hes proper bashed them up. Hes very grounded and if he is dominating spars he will ease off to let others work.. Something we disagree a lot on.. As for this fight I know what would happen and so does Mick snr... I think Michael would take the fight but in honesty his dad is right. Ronnie would stop Michael and badly.. Problem here is honesty.. Just say hes not fighting because hes a feather and we know he cant beat Ronnie. Would get loads more respect... I think it would also remove that fight from ever happening

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 03:57
by mickey1975
I'd take Roberts to win on points. Ronnie is tough and should last the distance.

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 04:58
by Stuarty
mickey1975 wrote:I'd take Roberts to win on points. Ronnie is tough and should last the distance.
Doubt it. Roberts hasn't got any sort of power. From what I've seen of both Clark would have far too much for him.

Or are you stirring the pot with that comment :OhYes:

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 17 Oct 2016, 15:10
by Stuarty
Roberts taking on Marco McCullough in Belfast next month in somewhat of a step up.

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 26 Oct 2016, 15:56
by markhdunlop
No way Roberts will take that fight, he will find a way out!

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 27 Oct 2016, 03:17
by maley1984
Rumour is roberts pulled out with a virus

Re: Ronnie Clark v Michael Roberts

Posted: 27 Oct 2016, 05:47
by Fitzy901
He is pulling out the fight rumours are he has a massive fight being lined up.

Rumours of Roberts v Oscar Valdez ate rife on the internet.