Page 1 of 1
Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 14:45
by gilgamesh
Tired of seeing the same 'ol goofy threads around here the last few days so I figured I'd put this one out there. The other day this came up in conversation on another forum. It may have been brought up on here before, but if it was I don't recall.
Who do you guys have in this fight and why?
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 14:47
by SaadOffTheDeck
Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 14:50
by gilgamesh
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
Yeah that's about the way I'd see it too. I figure Chavez would take the first few rounds, but Marquez would start timing him with counter punch after counter punch by the 3rd round and start boxing his ears off. Chavez is a tough S.O.B. that'll keep on coming so he'd take some more rounds in there, and could possibly drop Marquez at some point, but I'd definitely favor Marquez to do the better work overall as well.
You think the fight plays out any different at 135?
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 14:59
by SaadOffTheDeck
gilgamesh wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
Yeah that's about the way I'd see it too. I figure Chavez would take the first few rounds, but Marquez would start timing him with counter punch after counter punch by the 3rd round and start boxing his ears off. Chavez is a tough S.O.B. that'll keep on coming so he'd take some more rounds in there, and could possibly drop Marquez at some point, but I'd definitely favor Marquez to do the better work overall as well.
You think the fight plays out any different at 135?
No, I like Marquez at any weight. I never saw Chavez compete at that level, he beat a ton of really good fighters to cement his ATG status; but he's more McCallum than Duran to me.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:00
by Counter-puncher
Absolute classic, I don't think the weight changes things. I would leak more manlove-juice in this fight than I can imagine, I love both but think the style clash suits Marquez.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:00
by Seamus
Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:01
by Counter-puncher
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:gilgamesh wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez by surprisingly wide decision in a wicked action fight. I like Morales, MAB, Floyd and Pac over JCC too. Floyd very easily. Chavez was better at 35 & 40. Not sure if it was more experience or cutting less weight, but he's pretty overrated at 130.
Edit: I should say Marquez would deserve a clear decision, probably 8-4 Marquez and Chavez wins a SD.
Yeah that's about the way I'd see it too. I figure Chavez would take the first few rounds, but Marquez would start timing him with counter punch after counter punch by the 3rd round and start boxing his ears off. Chavez is a tough S.O.B. that'll keep on coming so he'd take some more rounds in there, and could possibly drop Marquez at some point, but I'd definitely favor Marquez to do the better work overall as well.
You think the fight plays out any different at 135?
No, I like Marquez at any weight. I never saw Chavez compete at that level, he beat a ton of really good fighters to cement his ATG status; but he's more McCallum than Duran to me.
Yeah, I love me some Chavez but I cant argue, hes got nothing to compare with beating Pacquiao's ass three times
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:02
by Counter-puncher
Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
Again I think pacquiaos style is difficult for JCC.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:02
by SaadOffTheDeck
Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
He'd get smoked.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:03
by Woldemar
In 130 Marquez by wide decision.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:04
by gilgamesh
Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
Pac W12 I would think. Faster movement, and he'd get off first on Chavez in most exchanges and get out of the way of Chavez's attack. Chavez would obviously land his share of shots, but I think Pac would've beaten him pretty comfortably.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:06
by Woldemar
How about Marquez vs Azumah Nelson in 130?Marquez W12 for me
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:07
by Counter-puncher
gilgamesh wrote:Seamus wrote:Then how would Julio do against Pac Man at 130 ?
Pac W12 I would think. Faster movement, and he'd get off first on Chavez in most exchanges and get out of the way of Chavez's attack. Chavez would obviously land his share of shots, but I think Pac would've beaten him pretty comfortably.
Yup pacs mobility means jcc can't really pin him down to unload and that left hand finds a home over and over
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:08
by Counter-puncher
Woldemar wrote:How about Marquez vs Azumah Nelson in 130?Marquez W12 for me
S/D or M/D
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:53
by elmersalsa
Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 15:56
by Woldemar
Marquez's style bad for JCC.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 16:01
by SaadOffTheDeck
elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 17:24
by elmersalsa
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
That's in your view.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 17:59
by gilgamesh
elmersalsa wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
That's in your view.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
I also would consider Marquez a greater overall fighter than Chavez.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 18:02
by SaadOffTheDeck
elmersalsa wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
That's in your view.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Yes, I speak in my view. Chavez might make my top 5 Mexicans.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 01:01
by ClivePatrickLyons
Woldemar wrote:How about Marquez vs Azumah Nelson in 130?Marquez W12 for me
Nelson at Feather/Jr Light beats Marquez in a classic that goes the distance close but un for Azumah

Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 11 Aug 2016, 10:28
by IKSRTFO
elmersalsa wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
That's in your view.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Head to head is also based on styles.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 16:30
by sas6789
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:elmersalsa wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
That's in your view.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
Yes, I speak in my view. Chavez might make my top 5 Mexicans.
Are you a Chavez hater or just a plain berk? Chavez is hands down the GOAT Mexican fighter and he dismantles Marquez at any weight.
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 17:48
by Keko
elmersalsa wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:elmersalsa wrote:Juan Manuel Marquez was a great boxer, but, he is not in the great Julio Cesar Chavez' class.
Agreed, Marquez was greater.
That's in your view.
Chavez was the best of Mexico ever
There is no question that he had the best career of all Mexican boxer.This is a fact.
Head to head is something else and everyone has their own opinion!
Re: Juan Manuel Marquez vs Julio Cesar Chavez @130
Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 18:28
by elmersalsa
Born of them great boxers. But, Julio Cesar Chavez was a class above Juan Manuel Marquez.