If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by caldo2025 »

If I had one Boxing wish, I'd wish that Boxing was run exactly like the UFC in terms of matchmaking, title fights and one recognized champion in each weight class. Boxing would become one of the greatest sports in the world.

What would be your Boxing wish?
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7255
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Oiky »

i'd wish for the times when fighters would just fight each other, no ifs no buts, the best vs the best, and didn't just say things for the sake of saying it.

thats basically it, get the fights on that should be on, too much bad matchmaking hurts boxing, its poxy and ridicolous
PsychoGamerTwo
Super Welterweight
Posts: 526
Joined: 09 Oct 2014, 18:04

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by PsychoGamerTwo »

Floyd getting knocked unconcious
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Stuarty »

Much the same as the OP. One champion, best fighting the best. Never going to happen though with TV and promoters etc..

Personally I'd love to go to Vegas for a big fight.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24700
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Tony1244 »

Fury, Wilder, Povetkin, Wlad, Joshua, and Parker would be forced into a round robin tournament where they fought every 120 days.

If someone got injured, and couldn't fight, they'd be replaced by a Pulev or Miller. No delays. Replacements if need be.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by boxing_rocks »

Haymon vs Arum with a winner fighting Ryabinsky.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17395
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Baby Face Finster »

No alphabet organizations with only 1 recognized World Champion.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Syntax Error »

One simple wish: Adonis Stevenson & Sergey Kovalev meet the unify the 175lb title in early 2017.

Not a lot to wish for, but seems almost impossible, sadly. :witzend: :evil:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46534
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by gilgamesh »

caldo2025 wrote:If I had one Boxing wish, I'd wish that Boxing was run exactly like the UFC in terms of matchmaking, title fights and one recognized champion in each weight class. Boxing would become one of the greatest sports in the world.

What would be your Boxing wish?
Your wish works for me
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24700
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:If I had one Boxing wish, I'd wish that Boxing was run exactly like the UFC in terms of matchmaking, title fights and one recognized champion in each weight class. Boxing would become one of the greatest sports in the world.

What would be your Boxing wish?
Your wish works for me

I'd like to 3rd this wish.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46534
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by gilgamesh »

I could also do without all the Jr. aka Super weight classes too. The only additional weight classes that have been added in recent decades that I'd want to keep are Strawweight and Cruiserweight.

I'd rather see Jr. Welterweight and Jr. Middleweights just be Lightweights, Welterweights or Middleweights as the case my be. We'd have a lot deeper divisions, and a lot more interesting matchups.

Middleweight and Jr. Middleweight as they currently are is a great example of what I mean. Neither division is especially stacked outside of the Top 4 or 5 guys in them, but if all the Jr. Middleweights were competing at Middleweight that'd be a pretty damn deep division all of the sudden.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Stuarty »

gilgamesh wrote:I could also do without all the Jr. aka Super weight classes too. The only additional weight classes that have been added in recent decades that I'd want to keep are Strawweight and Cruiserweight.

I'd rather see Jr. Welterweight and Jr. Middleweights just be Lightweights, Welterweights or Middleweights as the case my be. We'd have a lot deeper divisions, and a lot more interesting matchups.

Middleweight and Jr. Middleweight as they currently are is a great example of what I mean. Neither division is especially stacked outside of the Top 4 or 5 guys in them, but if all the Jr. Middleweights were competing at Middleweight that'd be a pretty damn deep division all of the sudden.
Dunno. Super Middleweight has always been a favourite of mine and a lot of Brits. Not great at the moment but has been very good in the past. Would you ditch 168?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46534
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by gilgamesh »

Stuarty30 wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I could also do without all the Jr. aka Super weight classes too. The only additional weight classes that have been added in recent decades that I'd want to keep are Strawweight and Cruiserweight.

I'd rather see Jr. Welterweight and Jr. Middleweights just be Lightweights, Welterweights or Middleweights as the case my be. We'd have a lot deeper divisions, and a lot more interesting matchups.

Middleweight and Jr. Middleweight as they currently are is a great example of what I mean. Neither division is especially stacked outside of the Top 4 or 5 guys in them, but if all the Jr. Middleweights were competing at Middleweight that'd be a pretty damn deep division all of the sudden.
Dunno. Super Middleweight has always been a favourite of mine and a lot of Brits. Not great at the moment but has been very good in the past. Would you ditch 168?
I wouldn't mind keeping 168 either as the gap between Middleweight and Light Heavyweight is a pretty big one...but I could do without Jr. Flyweight and Jr. Bantamweight and all that sh*t where there's a new weight class every 3 or 4 pounds. That sh*t's just ridiculous.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Freedom2013 »

One champion per division (one HONEST sanctioning organization)
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by ElJefe »

Think the majority of people are on the same page here. One champion per division without the contractual crap that stops the best fighting the best. Common sense really.

It's mad how these guys running boxing are obviously good businessmen to be in the positions they're in but their short term greed stops the sport being 10x bigger, which in turn would satisfy their greed and make them 10x richer. :brick:
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Killer Blow »

I don't mind multiple belts, but unifications should be mandatory. This Kovalev/Stevenson thing for example, should never be allowed to happen.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Killer Blow »

Tony1244 wrote:Fury, Wilder, Povetkin, Wlad, Joshua, and Parker would be forced into a round robin tournament where they fought every 120 days.

If someone got injured, and couldn't fight, they'd be replaced by a Pulev or Miller. No delays. Replacements if need be.
There should be a sweet sixteen knockout tournament every 5 years.

The first one should be Fury, Wlad, Wilder, Povetkin, Ortiz, Joshua, Pulev, Parker, Stiverne, Jennings, Takam, Ustinov, Duhaupas, Miller, Haye and Browne.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24700
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Tony1244 »

Killer Blow wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:Fury, Wilder, Povetkin, Wlad, Joshua, and Parker would be forced into a round robin tournament where they fought every 120 days.

If someone got injured, and couldn't fight, they'd be replaced by a Pulev or Miller. No delays. Replacements if need be.
There should be a sweet sixteen knockout tournament every 5 years.

The first one should be Fury, Wlad, Wilder, Povetkin, Ortiz, Joshua, Pulev, Parker, Stiverne, Jennings, Takam, Ustinov, Duhaupas, Miller, Haye and Browne.

I always forget Ortiz. Kind of ironic as I've seen him fight Live a # of times in minor fights.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Kalan »

I had it granted when Roy Jones was knocked out by Antonio Tarver... Floyd Mayweather never fought anyone like that or he would have bitten the dust too.

My next biggest wish is 1 World Champion in each weight division... That way the top boxers can't hide---as Chickenson and Santa Cruz do and May & Pac did.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Killer Blow »

Tony1244 wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:Fury, Wilder, Povetkin, Wlad, Joshua, and Parker would be forced into a round robin tournament where they fought every 120 days.

If someone got injured, and couldn't fight, they'd be replaced by a Pulev or Miller. No delays. Replacements if need be.
There should be a sweet sixteen knockout tournament every 5 years.

The first one should be Fury, Wlad, Wilder, Povetkin, Ortiz, Joshua, Pulev, Parker, Stiverne, Jennings, Takam, Ustinov, Duhaupas, Miller, Haye and Browne.

I always forget Ortiz. Kind of ironic as I've seen him fight Live a # of times in minor fights.
Ortiz could well be the best in the business. Only question mark is if one of the top guys can take him to the later rounds.
bw14
Super Lightweight
Posts: 12
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 19:04

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by bw14 »

Less state regulations, less fees, etc. -- make it easier for some one to start a promotional outfit. Would be a great way to attract the sport at the local level.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by asdfjkl »

That top fights actually happen and also, that they simply fight more often.

Kickboxers fight 5 times a week, sometimes several times a day. Titleholders fight like once a year?! Or against guys that have absolutely nothing to look for in a world titlefight (Molina, Duhaupas, Arreola).
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Rob3_142 »

Can I wish for more wishes?

Definitely liking the one champion for each division. Perhaps an independent body which overlooks and manages the sport, forcing unifications and top level fighters from fighting.

It seems only in boxing that fighters are left to organise the fights themselves, and if there is a mandatory, there are ways of getting out of it. Manny and Floyd should have fought in their prime, but because of nonsense politics they fought when they were both over the hill.
The End
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 931
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 17:53

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by The End »

Wladimir Klitschko Vs. Jim Grey
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: If you had one Boxing Wish, what would it be?

Post by Syntax Error »

Can I have another wish? :-P

Uniform rules all over the world please!

Boxing is one of the few sports where the rules can change dependent on which country you're in.

Countries like the USA must be really confusing as the rules can change from one side of the street to the next, depending on which state you're in!

A sport as potentially dangerous as boxing needs uniform rules IMHO.
Post Reply