Page 1 of 1
Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 16:25
by Like a Boss
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 16:43
by SaadOffTheDeck
Brook winning the first is insane. He was very competetive in the 3rd and 4th and clearly won the second. Not that I understand so many people worrying about cards that didn't matter.
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 16:44
by crusader
I agree...Brook winning the first is mental (although I've been told otherwise in the Brit section by Horse and someone from Brook's gym

)
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 16:46
by Like a Boss
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Brook winning the first is insane. He was very competetive in the 3rd and 4th and clearly won the second. Not that I understand so many people worrying about cards that didn't matter.
I have been reading everywhere since the fight finished about how "Brook was up on the cards."
The reality is only one judge had Brook ahead, and GGG made the cards about as relevant as yesterday's fish and chip paper by stopping Brook in the 5th.
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 16:51
by crusader
I think that stems from Eddie Hearn saying on TV that the judges had Brook up...obviously not though.
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 17:32
by twlyall
Shocking cards to best honest. TWO judges gave the first round to Brook. How that's even possible, I dont know. Two judges giving the fourth for Brook is not as shocking – albeit rather surprising in my view. Having watched the fight three times now – once with Sky-commentators, once with the HBO-commentators and once with no sound, I believe my first impression was the right one: Golovkin ahead 3-1 before the fifth.
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 17:45
by Counter-puncher
Judges clearly scoring on crowd noise.
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 17:48
by Escorpioza
LOL how can you give the first round to Brook... he was even wobbled and almost went down .. corrupt judges
Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 22:10
by ClivePatrickLyons
Was there a different 1st round because the 1st round I watched Brook got rocked and hurt in that round you cannot give to him

I also seen a clean knock down that wasn't awarded either fuc these type of idiot judge's that listen to the crowd's roar instead of doing a professional job do my head in get rid of these imposter's

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard
Posted: 13 Sep 2016, 00:36
by lazboy
This is so disgusting. You really take a big risk fighting in the UK if your not a favorite. There's been at least three significant fights I've watched in the last couple of months where the judging has been blatantly biased.
1 GGG-Brook
2 Josh Warrington - Hishashi Amagasa
3 The worst offender of them all Craig Kennedy - Joel (Big Joe) Djeko