Page 1 of 2

Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 20:45
by Freedom2013
According to a couple of sources including ESPN Desportes, Klitschko-Brown will be sanctioned by the WBA for the world title, and Fury will become WBA "Champion in Recess"

http://boxingnews.com.ua/en/news/17543- ... piona-mira

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 20:49
by lefty
If it happens that's still quite an intriguing fight.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 21:00
by Like a Boss
Freedom2013 wrote:According to a couple of sources including ESPN Desportes, Klitschko-Brown will be sanctioned by the WBA for the world title, and Fury will become WBA "Champion in Recess"

http://boxingnews.com.ua/ru/novosti/175 ... piona-mira
A couple of sources you say?

The shortcut above tells no English only speaking person anything.

Where are the other sources you are claiming?

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 23:30
by Lackeos
I thought Wlad's next opponent was going to be Fury, Joshua, Ortiz, and literally everyone else in the division. Well if it's Browne today, who is it going to be tomorrow? Also, I heard that Browne was fighting Oquendo. So now I have to choose which among a whole bevy of conflicting rumors to believe.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 23:45
by jezzamundo
If Klitschko is even a shadow of his former self he should still beat Browne handily.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 00:47
by diddy
Browne? Lucas Browne?

God awful. Total wipeout.

Wlad -5000.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 01:05
by crusader
The HW scene is a clusterfuck.

I thought it was supposed to be so great once Wlad lost? Hey, at least we got Martin-Glazkov :lol:

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 01:34
by Andrew
crusader wrote:The HW scene is a clusterfuck.

I thought it was supposed to be so great once Wlad lost? Hey, at least we got Martin-Glazkov :lol:
Dont forget the Wilder v Arreola an Joshua v Breazeale classics

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 03:14
by Freedom2013
Like a Boss wrote:
Freedom2013 wrote:According to a couple of sources including ESPN Desportes, Klitschko-Brown will be sanctioned by the WBA for the world title, and Fury will become WBA "Champion in Recess"

http://boxingnews.com.ua/ru/novosti/175 ... piona-mira
A couple of sources you say?

The shortcut above tells no English only speaking person anything.
English translation of the Ukrainian site: http://boxingnews.com.ua/en/news/17543- ... piona-mira
Where are the other sources you are claiming?
Several on twitter, as well as Polsat Sport... We'll know more in a few days.

https://twitter.com/polsatsport/status/ ... 7541767168

https://twitter.com/baylorictvboxin/sta ... 3553627136

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 03:22
by Sids
What about Oquendo?

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 04:30
by Killer Blow
No fight for the regular title then?

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 12:39
by SteveO
Killer Blow wrote:No fight for the regular title then?
It would have to be for the regular title.
To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
The proposed Browne-Oquendo fight might be a problem for the WBA though- unless Oquendo foregoes his right to the contest.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 12:45
by boxing_rocks
SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title. Chudinov who had this belt before he was robbed, also didn't have other titles, and Sturm himself earlier owned a MW Super title and only it.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 15:12
by SteveO
boxing_rocks wrote:
SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title.
That is the criteria, as stated on the WBA website - read it for yourself:
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-super-cham ... -64Rb3me0M

I don't know anything about the Sturm situation.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 15:35
by gilgamesh
Klitschko vs Browne is whatever, but Klitschko vs AJ is the far more desirable rumored matchup.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 16:02
by boxing_rocks
SteveO wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title.
That is the criteria, as stated on the WBA website - read it for yourself:
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-super-cham ... -64Rb3me0M

I don't know anything about the Sturm situation.
Most of their "super" champions don't own any other major titles:

http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-champions#.V-7EZfkrK9J

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 01 Oct 2016, 20:26
by p4p1
SteveO wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title.
That is the criteria, as stated on the WBA website - read it for yourself:
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-super-cham ... -64Rb3me0M

I don't know anything about the Sturm situation.
WBA doesn't follow its own rules at all. They will have super, regular and interim champions when their 'super' champ isn't a unified champ, their regular champ is healthy and defending and their interim champ is fight nobodies in his back yard.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 01 Oct 2016, 20:29
by Like a Boss
Sids wrote:What about Oquendo?
Bingo!

If fit, Oquendo contests the regular title in his next fight. That is chiselled in stone.

The WBA have already told Browne he is in the other corner and the pair have about another week to get that fight set.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 01 Oct 2016, 20:43
by Perseus
Watch Oquendo accept step aside money secure in the knowledge that the court order guarantees he will eventually get his title shot and the payday that comes with it.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 01 Oct 2016, 20:55
by Like a Boss
Perseus wrote:Watch Oquendo accept step aside money secure in the knowledge that the court order guarantees he will eventually get his title shot and the payday that comes with it.
It may well prove to be a very attractive option for him. He'd be a fool not to listen to what they might have to offer.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 02 Oct 2016, 03:07
by DA GOOSE
This was on the Boxing Kingdom site only Haye was mentioned as well.

https://twitter.com/BoxingKingdom14/sta ... 9252256768

How much credibility you can put in that who knows?

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 02 Oct 2016, 03:09
by Andrew
boxing_rocks wrote:
SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title. Chudinov who had this belt before he was robbed, also didn't have other titles, and Sturm himself earlier owned a MW Super title and only it.
Beibut Shumenov was upgraded to Super champion after about 15 months of inactivity

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 02 Oct 2016, 05:17
by Grailer
Haha would be funny if everyone ducks Joshua. He would have to give up his paper title to become #1 mandatory for other belts.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 02 Oct 2016, 07:37
by Boxing Prospect
Grailer wrote:Haha would be funny if everyone ducks Joshua. He would have to give up his paper title to become #1 mandatory for other belts.
Fury being stripped could be horrible news for him, strange how we might end job with Ortiz and Price as the only options...and Ortiz won't really be an option given his high risk low reward nature.

Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?

Posted: 02 Oct 2016, 08:14
by jbizzle20
SteveO wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:No fight for the regular title then?
It would have to be for the regular title.
To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
The proposed Browne-Oquendo fight might be a problem for the WBA though- unless Oquendo foregoes his right to the contest.
:TU: Thank you for explaining this. This alphabet soup sh*t is getting worse by the year. :witzend: