BoxRec

So only fat dan going with the story from what I can see but he's stating it's a fact and not a rumour. Oh dear.

Metro, Independent and Mirror are also saying this. So is Daily Mail.

Skips a test and miraculously finds an ankle injury as an excuse.

Pisses dirty then the next day calls the fight off with 'depression', which his uncle claims is due to not getting recognition in the papers.



GET WELL SOON LUKE.

Informed of the test on the 22nd, pulls out on the 23rd.

If the suggestion of bipolar/depression turns out to be nonsense...

Maybe fat dan's been hacked....

Raaaay gwan Tyson!!!!!!

As long as it's not a PED failure, I don't care what he takes tbh.

To be honest, everyone knows a certain other heavyweight sold cocaine in bulk.

I think I was the first one to mention this on a previous thread, all this depression is bull shite it's just a cover up over him getting caught out on the drug test, it was from a very good source, true or not we don't no

Who is the big man, the absolute gent John Fury and brother Peter going to find to blame for this?

tobyh5 wrote:Who is the big man, the absolute gent John Fury and brother Peter going to find to blame for this?

Zionists, gays and women

Cocaine is no PED he should not be banned for it. No surprises here of course Tyson is hardly a dedicated athlete but he hasn't gained advantage in the ring from taking cocaine.

Well that makes perfect sense.

I used to buy my Class A's off the Gypo's down Farnborough way.

Can't see why he should get his belts taken off him for a positive cocaine test. It hardly enhances your performance. It might make him talk bollocks to him in the clinches though

pimp wrote:I think I was the first one to mention this on a previous thread, all this depression is bull shite it's just a cover up over him getting caught out on the drug test, it was from a very good source, true or not we don't no

Yeah it was obvious, the family of bullshitters. I wonder how long the ban will be.

FFS! of course he should be stripped. Cocaine is one of a number of banned stimulants. Should he have special allowances for some reason? You fail a drug test, you should be stripped, simple as that.

Rugby player Matt Stevens was banned for 2 years for cocaine use. Not saying Fury should be banned for that long but I don't see why he should just carry on after being caught taking a banned (and illegal) drug

always big brother or i'm a celeb.

It does all make sense now the erratic behaviour. I wonder whether fury might not he bipolar. Its very common for people with the condition to self medicate.

tobyh5 wrote:Who is the big man, the absolute gent John Fury and brother Peter going to find to blame for this?

All non-travellers - it's all their fault mate conspiring against them

Hardly a surprise given his outpourings of stream of consciousness paranoid bullshit.

But it's a witch-hunt eh?

samwbr wrote: But it's a witch-hunt eh?

How - he had a drug test that he allegedly failed for PED's earlier in the year.

He was tested again and tested positive for cocaine.

Are you somehow suggesting that he should not have been tested? - if so, why not? - it looks as though they were right to test him because he has failed !

bripez wrote:

samwbr wrote: But it's a witch-hunt eh?

How - he had a drug test that he allegedly failed for PED's earlier in the year.

He was tested again and tested positive for cocaine.

Are you somehow suggesting that he should not have been tested? - if so, why not? - it looks as though they were right to test him because he has failed !

I think they were being sarcastic.

bripez wrote:

tobyh5 wrote:Who is the big man, the absolute gent John Fury and brother Peter going to find to blame for this?

All non-travellers - it's all their fault mate conspiring against them

Its the earth for creating coca leaves.

bripez wrote:

samwbr wrote: But it's a witch-hunt eh?

How - he had a drug test that he allegedly failed for PED's earlier in the year.

He was tested again and tested positive for cocaine.

Are you somehow suggesting that he should not have been tested? - if so, why not? - it looks as though they were right to test him because he has failed !

Errmmm