Page 1 of 1

Mitchell Smith

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 14:48
by Fitzy901
Returns tomorrow night, Don't know much about his opponent but he didn't look in terrific shape to be honest.

I saw an Interview with him where it said he will be staying at Super-Feather or maybe even going to Lightweight. IMO that would be bad move.

Hopefully him and George win tomorrow night and they can get the rematch on.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 15:19
by Rexob
The lad has blown his fuse, he thought he was unbeatable and looked a twat when Jupp did him, not going anywhere.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 15:39
by Stuarty
Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 15:53
by maley1984
Neither looked in great shape at the weigh in. Smith says his been training hard with Adam booth. 10 Stone for smith no way he makes feather.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 16:04
by Fitzy901
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 16:05
by Fitzy901
maley1984 wrote:Neither looked in great shape at the weigh in. Smith says his been training hard with Adam booth. 10 Stone for smith no way he makes feather.
He must have big legs because his top half looks like a small super Bantam.

I reckon his diet is to blame.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:07
by Taansend
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Nicolay Valuev :bow:

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:45
by Stuarty
Taansend wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Nicolay Valuev :bow:
:lol: Yesss

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 03:21
by Andrew
He was a grossly over rated fighter who developed a huge ego from beating journeymen Eastern Europeans who were generally moving up in weight as well.

I always remember the fight he had on the Eubank Saunders card. It was some Hungarian for the prestigious WBO European belt. Bunce and Lillis were raving about him before and after but I wasn't impressed at all.

George Jupp well and truly humbled him especially after his attitude in the pre fight press conference too.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 03:26
by chrisnew86
Naandrew wrote:He was a grossly over rated fighter who developed a huge ego from beating journeymen Eastern Europeans who were generally moving up in weight as well.

I always remember the fight he had on the Eubank Saunders card. It was some Hungarian for the prestigious WBO European belt. Bunce and Lillis were raving about him before and after but I wasn't impressed at all.

George Jupp well and truly humbled him especially after his attitude in the pre fight press conference too.
His attitude stunk.

" I want to put George in hospital, I want to see him being carried out of the ring "

What a Wanker

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 06:51
by Stuarty
Naandrew wrote:He was a grossly over rated fighter who developed a huge ego from beating journeymen Eastern Europeans who were generally moving up in weight as well.

I always remember the fight he had on the Eubank Saunders card. It was some Hungarian for the prestigious WBO European belt. Bunce and Lillis were raving about him before and after but I wasn't impressed at all.

George Jupp well and truly humbled him especially after his attitude in the pre fight press conference too.
Bunce and Lillis rave about Fwanks fighters ten a penny! They must get a bonus for it! I've always though Paul Butler was very overrated! Good fighter but not half as good as they make out! Enjoyed Tete handing his ass to him!

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 07:28
by samwbr
Seems like he realised he was a bit of a wanker

http://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2016/10/ ... a-bad-way/

I think he is a talent but the questions around his attitude and application will always be there.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 07:29
by Stuarty
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Barrera mate! Surely you must know that?

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 08:16
by Fitzy901
Stuarty30 wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Barrera mate! Surely you must know that?
Well I thought you might be a friend of Lyon Woodstock who claims the same thing lol.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 08:38
by Stuarty
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Barrera mate! Surely you must know that?
Well I thought you might be a friend of Lyon Woodstock who claims the same thing lol.
Not me man lol

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 10:05
by telboy66
He's not a bad lad he just lost sight of the big prize,there is nothing wrong with self confidence it's how you handle yourself after it gets dented that matters,I think we will see a different Mitchell tonight now that he's with Adam Booth,in his fight with Jupp there was no plan B he was so sure that he would KO him that nothing was in place for when he didn't ,he showed disrespect to Jupp before the fight and after by leaving the ring before George was presented with the belt which was unexceptable ,I'll be there tonight hoping to see a new more controlled boxer

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 10:47
by Fitzy901
What time does tonight show start on allegedly?

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 11:09
by samwbr
Fitzy901 wrote:What time does tonight show start on allegedly?
7pm

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 09 Oct 2016, 10:19
by Eddy
Don't like MS at all. Was totaly disrespectfull to Jupp before. All this "I was out of shape" or "I was depressed" ect seems to be getting passed around a lot when fighters lose or get caught doing drugs.

He's only humble cause he got slapped. If he'd had won that fight, MS would still be acting like a horriable little sh_t that he is. These boxers like him and Prince Patel, have seen the likes of Broner and Mayweather doing it, and are trying to copy them. I don't blame them in that sense, as it gets you recgnized, but when you get a hiding, don't give it all the excuses

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 09 Oct 2016, 16:15
by Fitzy901
You can dislike him but you can't help but admit he has got bags of talent.

If he got himself down to feather/Super-Bantam he could go places.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 10 Oct 2016, 00:50
by crusader
Bags of talent? As in world class talent? Euro? British?

He's certainly proven that he can beat up journeymen and some area level guys (not George Jupp though).

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 10 Oct 2016, 01:57
by maley1984
Fitzy901 wrote:You can dislike him but you can't help but admit he has got bags of talent.

If he got himself down to feather/Super-Bantam he could go places.

No way he makes super ban and I doubt he will get down to feather.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 10 Oct 2016, 02:42
by ChessBoxer
Mitchell Smith is talented and has huge potential . He underestimated Jupp who clearly outboxed him and lost by a clear mile . Smith needs a new approach you cant just throw power punches all day and expect your opponent to walk onto them. I seriously believe with the right trainer he could certainly go places but his technique is/was awful.

Re: Mitchell Smith

Posted: 10 Oct 2016, 03:38
by Fitzy901
ChessBoxer wrote:Mitchell Smith is talented and has huge potential . He underestimated Jupp who clearly outboxed him and lost by a clear mile . Smith needs a new approach you cant just throw power punches all day and expect your opponent to walk onto them. I seriously believe with the right trainer he could certainly go places but his technique is/was awful.
His technique is awful?

Then what the fornicate is Anthony Joshua's technique like or someone like Ohara Davies or Andy Townend.