BoxRec

rossij8 wrote:Skybet have Burns a firm favourite

lefty wrote:

rossij8 wrote:Skybet have Burns a firm favourite

A lot of money has been going on Relikh going off of oddschecker though.

jameswilson wrote:Glad to hear the minutes silence turned into a minutes applause by the crowd. Obviously it is tragic so some might say applause is inappropriate but it means the usual dickheads who usually shout during the moments silence can't do so.

jameswilson wrote:

lefty wrote:

rossij8 wrote:Skybet have Burns a firm favourite

A lot of money has been going on Relikh going off of oddschecker though.

I'v got a patent on Relikh, Hooper and Lewison. Deep down I don't think any of them are gonna do it but I don't think either fighter is as big an underdog as the odds suggest.

Neil Gee wrote:

jameswilson wrote:Glad to hear the minutes silence turned into a minutes applause by the crowd. Obviously it is tragic so some might say applause is inappropriate but it means the usual dickheads who usually shout during the moments silence can't do so.

Excellent comment James

jameswilson wrote:

lefty wrote:

rossij8 wrote:Skybet have Burns a firm favourite

A lot of money has been going on Relikh going off of oddschecker though.

I'v got a patent on Relikh, Hooper and Lewison. Deep down I don't think any of them are gonna do it but I don't think either fighter is as big an underdog as the odds suggest.

lefty wrote:

jameswilson wrote:

lefty wrote: A lot of money has been going on Relikh going off of oddschecker though.

I'v got a patent on Relikh, Hooper and Lewison. Deep down I don't think any of them are gonna do it but I don't think either fighter is as big an underdog as the odds suggest.

I put some on Relikh aswell. I'm not particularly confident of hum pulling it off but he is an unknown quantity somewhat and I think Burns last fight and win flatters him somewhat as Di Rocco was truly dire. Burns hasn't looked that great for a good few years now.

Relikh could end up being absolutely awful as some already believe him to be. We really don't know. However from what I've seen of him he looks better than Di Roco to mean if nothing else. He also seems to legitimate self belief/bordering on arrogance which could go either really badly for him or he could deliver. Time will tell. He said he wanted to spar Hatton the first day he started training with him.

Stuarty30 wrote:

lefty wrote:

jameswilson wrote:
I'v got a patent on Relikh, Hooper and Lewison. Deep down I don't think any of them are gonna do it but I don't think either fighter is as big an underdog as the odds suggest.

I put some on Relikh aswell. I'm not particularly confident of hum pulling it off but he is an unknown quantity somewhat and I think Burns last fight and win flatters him somewhat as Di Rocco was truly dire. Burns hasn't looked that great for a good few years now.

Relikh could end up being absolutely awful as some already believe him to be. We really don't know. However from what I've seen of him he looks better than Di Roco to mean if nothing else. He also seems to legitimate self belief/bordering on arrogance which could go either really badly for him or he could deliver. Time will tell. He said he wanted to spar Hatton the first day he started training with him.

I'm a mad Scot and actually boxed in a few tournaments with Burns as an amateur. I've been to a lot of his fights and was ringside when he won the belt but I actually considered putting a few quid on the other fella as well! I went for Burns though. 4 or 5 KO.

lefty wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:

lefty wrote: I put some on Relikh aswell. I'm not particularly confident of hum pulling it off but he is an unknown quantity somewhat and I think Burns last fight and win flatters him somewhat as Di Rocco was truly dire. Burns hasn't looked that great for a good few years now.

Relikh could end up being absolutely awful as some already believe him to be. We really don't know. However from what I've seen of him he looks better than Di Roco to mean if nothing else. He also seems to legitimate self belief/bordering on arrogance which could go either really badly for him or he could deliver. Time will tell. He said he wanted to spar Hatton the first day he started training with him.

I'm a mad Scot and actually boxed in a few tournaments with Burns as an amateur. I've been to a lot of his fights and was ringside when he won the belt but I actually considered putting a few quid on the other fella as well! I went for Burns though. 4 or 5 KO.

Yeah, it's nothing against Burns. I like him a lot as a person. He comes across as a great fella. In an ideal world for me- Relikh beats Burns tonight, Hearn makes the rematch and then Burns wins the return. I'm just trying to make some moolah

Stuarty30 wrote:

lefty wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:
I'm a mad Scot and actually boxed in a few tournaments with Burns as an amateur. I've been to a lot of his fights and was ringside when he won the belt but I actually considered putting a few quid on the other fella as well! I went for Burns though. 4 or 5 KO.

Yeah, it's nothing against Burns. I like him a lot as a person. He comes across as a great fella. In an ideal world for me- Relikh beats Burns tonight, Hearn makes the rematch and then Burns wins the return. I'm just trying to make some moolah

When it comes to Burns I find myself thinking like that as well because of what happened with Fwank! Apparently he never saw a brown cent of the Mitchell money? Dunno if that's true but that's the cry! He went from arguably his best performance against 'cock feeder' to being inactive then mediocre! I think it's no coincidence and he has more left than what most give him credit for! I say that in hope!

Neil Gee wrote:Cardle running away with this. 4-1 Cardle.

DannyMCR wrote:

Neil Gee wrote:Cardle running away with this. 4-1 Cardle.

Which round did you give to Hooper? I thought he nicked R2 but wasn't fully concentrating as I was tucking into a steak