Page 1 of 1

Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 18:18
by Fitzy901
Stay away from the UK, it's worse then Germany.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 18:22
by stujones
Knock em out, it might get counted as a KD then - depends if the ref elects to pick up the fighter and carry him back to the corner or not.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 18:24
by rd350lc
Fitzy901 wrote:Stay away from the UK, it's worse then Germany.
got to agree with you , I used to think Germany was a joke , but this is getting silly now .

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 18:50
by Autobarn
Bit of a generalisation?

Linares won a fair decision in a competitive battle with Crolla only recently.

Shame no one praises fair or good scoring when it happens.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 18:55
by chad
Is it a case of foreign fighters coming to the UK in general or foreign fighters appearing on a Matchroom card that is the issue here?

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 19:28
by Boxing Prospect
Autobarn wrote:Bit of a generalisation?

Linares won a fair decision in a competitive battle with Crolla only recently.

Shame no one praises fair or good scoring when it happens.
Didn't that bout literally come down to the last round on the cards when most had a clear but competitive Linares win?

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 20:51
by Tanzio
Autobarn wrote:Bit of a generalisation?

Linares won a fair decision in a competitive battle with Crolla only recently.

Shame no one praises fair or good scoring when it happens.
"Hear, hear, chaps!! Three cheers for the fair scoring tonight. Let's hear it for the competent referee too!!" :yay:

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 07 Oct 2016, 21:39
by crusader
This type of stuff happens in many countries.

Japan may be the fairest to visitors. A lot of foreigners have fought and won there, but how many shockers have there been? Some complained about Moreno-Yamanaka I, but I thought it was a justifiable result.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:55
by Tanzio
crusader wrote:This type of stuff happens in many countries.

Japan may be the fairest to visitors. A lot of foreigners have fought and won there, but how many shockers have there been? Some complained about Moreno-Yamanaka I, but I thought it was a justifiable result.
I think that people are tired of so many fights having a card utterly out of wack. I have been guilty of being the score out of wack. I still think that Ramming Speed won his first fight with Pac. I would have no problem if Pac would have been given the decision but more than 116-112 either way is too wide, imo.

It seems to irritate people when someone who won a competitive fight gets a 118-110 card. I tend to be happy if it went the right direction, no matter how far off what my score is.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 02:28
by banjo
No worse than any other country.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 03:38
by crusader
banjo wrote:No worse than any other country.
Have you really watched enough fights across enough countries to make such a sweeping comment? Tell me why Japan is no better....

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 03:39
by bripez
banjo wrote:No worse than any other country.
That's alright then.

Rather than acknowledging a problem (never mind looking at ways to sort it) we justify it by saying we are no more incompetent/corrupt than other countries?

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 03:50
by Andrew
Tanzio wrote:
crusader wrote:This type of stuff happens in many countries.

Japan may be the fairest to visitors. A lot of foreigners have fought and won there, but how many shockers have there been? Some complained about Moreno-Yamanaka I, but I thought it was a justifiable result.
I think that people are tired of so many fights having a card utterly out of wack. I have been guilty of being the score out of wack. I still think that Ramming Speed won his first fight with Pac. I would have no problem if Pac would have been given the decision but more than 116-112 either way is too wide, imo.

It seems to irritate people when someone who won a competitive fight gets a 118-110 card. I tend to be happy if it went the right direction, no matter how far off what my score is.

This got Paul Smith a rematch with Abaraham :brick:

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 05:31
by Boxing Prospect
crusader wrote:
banjo wrote:No worse than any other country.
Have you really watched enough fights across enough countries to make such a sweeping comment? Tell me why Japan is no better....
On that same note, look at the officials used in recent Japanese world title fights (Kano vs Takayama aside)

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 06:15
by maninthemiddle
The judges scores that have recently been questioned have all been foreign officials. ..I havent checked but the sole British judge has generally been closest to the general consensus. ..

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 06:19
by davie
Tanzio wrote:
crusader wrote:This type of stuff happens in many countries.

Japan may be the fairest to visitors. A lot of foreigners have fought and won there, but how many shockers have there been? Some complained about Moreno-Yamanaka I, but I thought it was a justifiable result.
I think that people are tired of so many fights having a card utterly out of wack. I have been guilty of being the score out of wack. I still think that Ramming Speed won his first fight with Pac. I would have no problem if Pac would have been given the decision but more than 116-112 either way is too wide, imo.

It seems to irritate people when someone who won a competitive fight gets a 118-110 card. I tend to be happy if it went the right direction, no matter how far off what my score is.
With the 10 must system it depends what kind of fight you are talking about
If theres 12 really close rounds, it could go 120-108 either way depending on what the judge likes or 114-114.
Where as when you have clear rounds (pacquiao absolutely had to win 5 of those rounds, the other 7 were subjective IMO) then that's when you're left scratching your head.
I never saw last nights fight but from what I can gather the lad one 5 clear rounds at the start and end of the fight.
In which case 115-113 to Ricky is justifiable 118-112 isn't.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 06:42
by Stuarty
This thread would usually get my back up but I'm finding it hard to argue the toss after last night! I'm a big Burns fan and I actually thought he edged it last night but the scores were a bad joke!

When he fought Beltran I was genuinely angry for the guy! That must rank with one of the worst decisions I've seen!

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 06:53
by Realistic
maninthemiddle wrote:The judges scores that have recently been questioned have all been foreign officials. ..I havent checked but the sole British judge has generally been closest to the general consensus. ..
Don't let facts get in the way of a good witch hunt

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 08:17
by Fitzy901
Realistic wrote:
maninthemiddle wrote:The judges scores that have recently been questioned have all been foreign officials. ..I havent checked but the sole British judge has generally been closest to the general consensus. ..
Don't let facts get in the way of a good witch hunt
:lol:

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 10:08
by lefthook82
Not that it was in any way a factor but seriously need to be getting neutral refs in world title fights

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 10:15
by Sids
Concider yourself lucky your not Philipino fighting in Australia.

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 10:35
by jameswilson

Re: Advise to foreign fighters

Posted: 08 Oct 2016, 12:43
by rd350lc
lefthook82 wrote:Not that it was in any way a factor but seriously need to be getting neutral refs in world title fights
I think it's more of a problem of inept judging .