Page 1 of 2

Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 15:28
by Taansend

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 15:35
by Horse
Disgusting fight.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 16:16
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:Disgusting fight.
:lol:

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 16:27
by Stuarty
Has Quigg not moved up to feather? McDonnell is still a Bantam. Can't see it happening anytime soon.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 16:37
by Horse
McDonnell has plenty of good fights for him at bantamweight and Quigg has plenty of good fights for him at super bantamweight.

What's the point of this?

This is one of the worst possible fights that can be made in world boxing right now.

Let us all pray that this abominable fight is not made.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 16:39
by craigjenkins05
In that article it says quigg had said that his December 10th fight at featherweight will be a one off seems a bit far fetched considering fastcar has said it's a world title eliminator

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 17:32
by davie
Horse wrote:McDonnell has plenty of good fights for him at bantamweight and Quigg has plenty of good fights for him at super bantamweight.

What's the point of this?

This is one of the worst possible fights that can be made in world boxing right now.

Let us all pray that this abominable fight is not made.

Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.

I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight

Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 17:47
by Horse
davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.

I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight

Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
It doesn't matter who would win.

This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.

Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 18:09
by Boxerbeetle
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.

I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight

Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
It doesn't matter who would win.

This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.

Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?
There's no chance of this fight happening.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 18:12
by Horse
Boxerbeetle wrote:There's no chance of this fight happening.
Because God would not allow it?

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 18:15
by Boxerbeetle
Horse wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:There's no chance of this fight happening.
Because God would not allow it?
God wouldn't mind seeing the fight, it's Eddie who won't allow it.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 18:25
by Horse
Boxerbeetle wrote:God wouldn't mind seeing the fight, it's Eddie who won't allow it.
Then God has no mercy?

Eddie is a good man who will protect us from such wickedness?

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 19:00
by keirw
Horse wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:God wouldn't mind seeing the fight, it's Eddie who won't allow it.
Then God has no mercy?

Eddie is a good man who will protect us from such wickedness?
Eddie's accountant is God as far as this fight is concerned, if the numbers add up even Moses himself won't be able to stop this fight from happening.

Fortunately Quigg and his team have their sights set on much bigger paydays so I can't see the fight happening in the near future.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 05:31
by billy nelson
I think Quigg wins he's to strong for Jaime imo, Jaime has a good engine but so has Quigg and I'd see a late stoppage for Quigg, a fight I'd certainly look forward to though

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 05:41
by Horse
keirw wrote:Eddie's accountant is God as far as this fight is concerned, if the numbers add up even Moses himself won't be able to stop this fight from happening.

Fortunately Quigg and his team have their sights set on much bigger paydays so I can't see the fight happening in the near future.
It doesn't really seem like a big fight.

Wouldn't he make more if he went to Japan to fight Yamanaka?

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 07:40
by keirw
Horse wrote:
keirw wrote:Eddie's accountant is God as far as this fight is concerned, if the numbers add up even Moses himself won't be able to stop this fight from happening.

Fortunately Quigg and his team have their sights set on much bigger paydays so I can't see the fight happening in the near future.
It doesn't really seem like a big fight.

Wouldn't he make more if he went to Japan to fight Yamanaka?
Mcdonnell would, but would Eddie?

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 10:53
by forcefraser
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.

I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight

Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
It doesn't matter who would win.

This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.

Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?

Would you prefer to see Sprott v Skelton again over this?

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 10:54
by Horse
forcefraser wrote:Would you prefer to see Sprott v Skelton again over this?
Of course.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 10:59
by Killer Blow
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.

I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight

Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
It doesn't matter who would win.

This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.

Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?
Yet for some reason you want to see Bellew vs Haye.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 11:15
by Horse
Killer Blow wrote:Yet for some reason you want to see Bellew vs Haye.
That fight is less likely to ruin good potential future fights for either of them.

If McDonnell moves up to super bantamweight then he is unlikely to drop back down again for all of the good fights that he can have there.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 11:29
by Crease
Taansend wrote:Quigg v McDonnell
The fight doesn't interest me, they are both good fighters, but the size difference would be telling (yet again).

Realistically, this would be another Brook vs Gavin all over again, with the smaller man getting bashed up.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 11:30
by T w_savage
I thought there was a plan for quigg to move up a weight? I think this is a 'arum' ( chatting about nonsense fights to keep guys in the public consciousness) .

Both guys have been inactive for various reasons and this 'arum' technique will help raise their profiles.

It's a good fight for Mcdonnell but terrible idea for quigg, it's not worth too much debate though as it simply won't happen.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 11:31
by Crease
T w_savage wrote:I thought there was a plan for quigg to move up a weight?
He is and he will. He's be campaigning now as a Featherweight.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 11:31
by Horse
Crease wrote:The fight doesn't interest me, they are both good fighters, but the size difference would be telling (yet again).

Realistically, this would be another Brook vs Gavin all over again, with the smaller man getting bashed up.
It could ruin McDonnell's career and will do very little for Quigg.

It's just an awful fight.

Re: Quigg v McDonnell

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 11:38
by T w_savage
Horse wrote:
Crease wrote:The fight doesn't interest me, they are both good fighters, but the size difference would be telling (yet again).

Realistically, this would be another Brook vs Gavin all over again, with the smaller man getting bashed up.
It could ruin McDonnell's career and will do very little for Quigg.

It's just an awful fight.
It's a promotional ploy, nothing more.

It's to get fans talking and stir up social media, there is no money in the fight to set off the risk to both men... Quigg brings little after his abysmal showing vs frampton ( split decision :lol: ) and Jamie as great as he is has had his two best wins abroad ( kameda) watched by a man as his dog domestically.

Put them together ... Still no money, it's not PPv and won't boost either mans profile to make it worth losing money over..

Seriously, won't happen! Just a trick to get you all chatting..