Clearly, there are a whole lot of people who have no clue about the difference between a robbery and a close decision that did not go your way. They remind me of the people protesting Trump after the election.
The only satisfactory decision would have been a draw in this case.
There is no way that Ward supporters would have raised so much stink if the decision would have gone against them because probably half of those who picked Ward wanted to see Krusher win, including Americans like me.
I admit that I felt guilty ending up with a 114-113 score for Ward because there were enough close rounds to have swung it between 115-112 either way. I was hoping for a draw if Krusher did not get the close decision.
The only way the word "robbery" can accurately be utilized regarding this fight is to describe how sourpuss Krusher fanatics are robbing us of a discussion purely focused on the great skill and heart demonstrated in that ring last night.
You remind me of a litter of piglets denied their mother's tit.
Disgraceful decisions happen across the globe. America isn't alone in that sense.
Anyone who claims Ward won the fight, could only do so if they ignore Kovalev's contribution. There is talk of close rounds, but as the Champion and the aggressor in the fight, doesn't Kovalev get the benefit of the doubt?
You have to stray too far from any sense of objectivity to agree with this decision. That's the problem I have with it.
G.McClellan wrote:Disgraceful decisions happen across the globe. America isn't alone in that sense.
Anyone who claims Ward won the fight, could only do so if they ignore Kovalev's contribution. There is talk of close rounds, but as the Champion and the aggressor in the fight, doesn't Kovalev get the benefit of the doubt?
You have to stray too far from any sense of objectivity, to agree with this decision. That's the problem I have with it.
G.McClellan wrote:Disgraceful decisions happen across the globe. America isn't alone in that sense.
Anyone who claims Ward won the fight, could only do so if they ignore Kovalev's contribution. There is talk of close rounds, but as the Champion and the aggressor in the fight, doesn't Kovalev get the benefit of the doubt?
You have to stray too far from any sense of objectivity to agree with this decision. That's the problem I have with it.
There is no benefit of the doubt. The rounds are scored individually. They are totalled and the result is announced.