Page 1 of 1
I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 10:18
by Jip
i watched enough live fight of ggg, gonzales, kovalev and ward to know that these 4 aint p4p king. they good boxers, but not the complet package. whether they faught better opponents. i dont care. having better opponents on your resume, doesnt make you automaticly a better boxer than someone with less big names on his record. often times it has been proven that the man with less fights and no names beaten prior to his fight, at the end won the battle. rigondeaux/donaire and usyk/glowacki just to name 2 examples.
P4P
1. Rigondeaux
2. Lomachenko
3. Inoue
4. Gonzales
5. Golovkin
6. Kovalev
7. Crawford
8. Ward
9. Alvarez
10. Usyk
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 19:54
by Badhusker
Jip wrote:i watched enough live fight of ggg, gonzales, kovalev and ward to know that these 4 aint p4p king. they good boxers, but not the complet package. whether they faught better opponents. i dont care. having better opponents on your resume, doesnt make you automaticly a better boxer than someone with less big names on his record. often times it has been proven that the man with less fights and no names beaten prior to his fight, at the end won the battle. rigondeaux/donaire and usyk/glowacki just to name 2 examples.
P4P
1. Rigondeaux
2. Lomachenko
3. Inoue
4. Gonzales
5. Golovkin
6. Kovalev
7. Crawford
8. Ward
9. Alvarez
10. Usyk
Don't P4P lists normally include guys that are at least the champion at their own weight?

Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 20:18
by SaadOffTheDeck
I haven't done one for ages.
1. Crawford
2. Gonzalez
3. Kovalev
4. Golovkin
5. Lomachenko
6. Ward
7. Spence
8. Rigondeaux
9. Pac
10. Andrade
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 20:21
by diddy
Crawford needs to fight someone good to get that status.
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 20:23
by SaadOffTheDeck
diddy wrote:Crawford needs to fight someone good to get that status.
Obviously he doesn't, he's already there.
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 20:24
by Tanzio
Ward
Krusher
3G
Chocolatito
Hitman Jr.
GingerHead
Pac
Inoue
Lomachenko
Sometimes
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 21:01
by boxing_rocks
1-3 Crawford/Golovkin/Lomachenko
4-6 Gonzalez/Inoue/Spence
7-9 Kovalev/Thurman/Brook
10-12 Ward/Rigo/Canelo
P.S. I wouldn't be very surprised if Beterbiev or Gvozdyk beat Ward.
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Posted: 21 Nov 2016, 03:41
by Jip
Badhusker wrote:Jip wrote:i watched enough live fight of ggg, gonzales, kovalev and ward to know that these 4 aint p4p king. they good boxers, but not the complet package. whether they faught better opponents. i dont care. having better opponents on your resume, doesnt make you automaticly a better boxer than someone with less big names on his record. often times it has been proven that the man with less fights and no names beaten prior to his fight, at the end won the battle. rigondeaux/donaire and usyk/glowacki just to name 2 examples.
P4P
1. Rigondeaux
2. Lomachenko
3. Inoue
4. Gonzales
5. Golovkin
6. Kovalev
7. Crawford
8. Ward
9. Alvarez
10. Usyk
Don't P4P lists normally include guys that are at least the champion at their own weight?

no