Most titles fought for in one fight
Posted: 04 Dec 2016, 04:35
Im sure there have been 4 titles fought for in one fight before, but can anyone find any other fights that there have been more than 4 individual titles on the line?
At World level it depends you count the IBO. I mention this as Wladimir Klitschko held the WBA, WBO, IBF and the IBO. But from British perspective there has been.mimmy123 wrote:Im sure there have been 4 titles fought for in one fight before, but can anyone find any other fights that there have been more than 4 individual titles on the line?
Cecila Brakehus has also got a healthy collection at Welterweight.Boxing Prospect wrote:Think Salandy vs Lukasik was gor more titles than is actually listed here
http://boxrec.com/boxer/129093
Calzaghe and Haye would have had them all simultaneously if it wasn't for the IBF. They also stripped Taylor straight away as well.ElJefe wrote:Roy had just about every belt under the sun before he jumped to HW. IIRC the only world title he never won was the WBO title which Michalczewski kept in Germany for 10 years.
B-Hop is the only man to unify what are today recognised as the 4 major world titles. Jermain Taylor is the only other man to hold all 4 after beating Hopkins.
Yep. Calzaghe even won the IBF from Lacy I think but was later stripped and never won it back.Naandrew wrote:Calzaghe and Haye would have had them all simultaneously if it wasn't for the IBF. They also stripped Taylor straight away as well.ElJefe wrote:Roy had just about every belt under the sun before he jumped to HW. IIRC the only world title he never won was the WBO title which Michalczewski kept in Germany for 10 years.
B-Hop is the only man to unify what are today recognised as the 4 major world titles. Jermain Taylor is the only other man to hold all 4 after beating Hopkins.
Same thing with nazeem hamed,he beat all 4 title holders at featherweiggt but wba didnt recognise him so the title wasnt on the line but naz smashed him anyway he beat robinson for wbo boom boom for ibf soto for wbc and i think wba title holder was vasquez,if wba was on the line he would of been the first man to hold all 4 major titlesElJefe wrote:Roy had just about every belt under the sun before he jumped to HW. IIRC the only world title he never won was the WBO title which Michalczewski kept in Germany for 10 years.
B-Hop is the only man to unify what are today recognised as the 4 major world titles. Jermain Taylor is the only other man to hold all 4 after beating Hopkins.
Although not simultaneously - cos by the time he fought Vasquez he was also stripped of the IBF title as he did not fight his mandatory - Hector Lizzaraga. I guess it is hard to satify both the fans, the boxing public and the organising bodies. Roy Jones accepted his mandatories - got a plethora of belts for his troubles, but also a "Roycott" when it came to PPV.thechump wrote:Same thing with nazeem hamed,he beat all 4 title holders at featherweiggt but wba didnt recognise him so the title wasnt on the line but naz smashed him anyway he beat robinson for wbo boom boom for ibf soto for wbc and i think wba title holder was vasquez,if wba was on the line he would of been the first man to hold all 4 major titlesElJefe wrote:Roy had just about every belt under the sun before he jumped to HW. IIRC the only world title he never won was the WBO title which Michalczewski kept in Germany for 10 years.
B-Hop is the only man to unify what are today recognised as the 4 major world titles. Jermain Taylor is the only other man to hold all 4 after beating Hopkins.
That's right.Stevieb8006 wrote:I'm sure Roy Jones defended ludicrous amounts of belts at one stage
Edit: 6. On the line vs Clinton woods
That's the one I remember, he had people helping carry the belts for him.Stevieb8006 wrote:I'm sure Roy Jones defended ludicrous amounts of belts at one stage
Edit: 6. On the line vs Clinton woods