Page 1 of 1

McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 10:33
by IKSRTFO
McGregor's UFC fighting weight has ranged between 145 and 170 so it's safe to say he can fight from 147 to 168. What happens if he decides to fight..

Canelo
Cotto
Ishe Smith
Pacquiao
Khan
GGG
Bundrage
Marquez

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 10:46
by cletomex
I heard he is fighting Tyson Fury in the UK

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 11:05
by tigermoth87
I mentioned it earlier but if he's serious, he should enter prize fighter.

He gases too easily to last the full 12 and Prizefighter tends to feature a bunch of domestic level fighters so he can test the waters there first.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 11:58
by ewenhay
IKSRTFO wrote:McGregor's UFC fighting weight has ranged between 145 and 170 so it's safe to say he can fight from 147 to 168. What happens if he decides to fight..

Canelo
Cotto
Ishe Smith
Pacquiao
Khan
GGG
Bundrage
Marquez
I think he loses by stoppage against every single one of those. Even bundrage and Smith

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 12:22
by Boxing Writer
IKSRTFO wrote:McGregor's UFC fighting weight has ranged between 145 and 170 so it's safe to say he can fight from 147 to 168. What happens if he decides to fight..

Canelo
Cotto
Ishe Smith
Pacquiao
Khan
GGG
Bundrage
Marquez
He would get battered and KO'ed/stopped against all of them. Hell, even Ishe Smith probably won't make you fall asleep 1 minute after the beginning of the fight for the first time in his career if he faces McGregor.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 13:49
by crusader
If he wants to win he should be looking to fight someone like Artem Karpets rather than these guys.

I would love to see him fight GGG though :lol:

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 14:27
by lefty
tigermoth87 wrote:I mentioned it earlier but if he's serious, he should enter prize fighter.

He gases too easily to last the full 12 and Prizefighter tends to feature a bunch of domestic level fighters so he can test the waters there first.
Prize fighter wouldn't pay anywhere near enough money for him to do that.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 15:58
by IKSRTFO

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 16:45
by Boxing Writer
Does anybody really believe McGregor has any chance of beating any decent boxer? Look at this video and say, if you still believe he has a chance?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VZlWdUjvKA

Conor is beyond awful in boxing. Everythink he does, he does in a super slow motion. He is enormously stiff and robotic and telegraphs every punch so much that he wouldn't land anything even against a guy like Provodnikov. He would make Provo look like Willie Pepp.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 17:08
by IKSRTFO
Boxing Writer wrote:Does anybody really believe McGregor has any chance of beating any decent boxer? Look at this video and say, if you still believe he has a chance?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VZlWdUjvKA

Conor is beyond awful in boxing. Everythink he does, he does in a super slow motion. He is enormously stiff and robotic and telegraphs every punch so much that he wouldn't land anything even against a guy like Provodnikov. He would make Provo look like Willie Pepp.
It'll be fun to watch though. I hope he does step in there with someone like Mallignaggi or Katsides and gets embarrased.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 19:25
by tigermoth87
lefty wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:I mentioned it earlier but if he's serious, he should enter prize fighter.

He gases too easily to last the full 12 and Prizefighter tends to feature a bunch of domestic level fighters so he can test the waters there first.
Prize fighter wouldn't pay anywhere near enough money for him to do that.
Yeah, true.

But it's really the only way I can see him having any success in boxing.

Going in with anyone in the top 50 for 12 rounds he's going to lose.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 19:31
by Like a Boss
IKSRTFO wrote:McGregor's UFC fighting weight has ranged between 145 and 170 so it's safe to say he can fight from 147 to 168. What happens if he decides to fight..

Canelo
Cotto
Ishe Smith
Pacquiao
Khan
GGG
Bundrage
Marquez
Conor loses to all of them. This whole thing is a scam anyway. He will not box again.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 20:18
by Jip
IKSRTFO wrote:McGregor's UFC fighting weight has ranged between 145 and 170 so it's safe to say he can fight from 147 to 168. What happens if he decides to fight..

Canelo
Cotto
Ishe Smith
Pacquiao
Khan
GGG
Bundrage
Marquez
he only fights big names for big bucks. kahn, pacquiao, canelo, thats it. all 3 wold beat him, but it would be more fun, than those guys against floyd. can you imagine, a guy outside of boxing could make it more fan entertaining than the so called best lol

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 22:59
by RoyRJ
McGregor lost to a Marijuana user who trained for 20 days! He'll lost to a real boxing fighter in 6 rounds by knock out!

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 23:14
by Tanzio
Now I am being convinced that I want to see him get in the ring with a pro boxer and mix it up. I might even root for the arrogant SOB.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 06 Dec 2016, 06:02
by BitPlayer
He needs to fight Zelenoff, the whole thing would be such a farce it'll be epic.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 06 Dec 2016, 06:36
by caldo2025
Boxing Writer wrote:Does anybody really believe McGregor has any chance of beating any decent boxer? Look at this video and say, if you still believe he has a chance?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VZlWdUjvKA

Conor is beyond awful in boxing. Everythink he does, he does in a super slow motion. He is enormously stiff and robotic and telegraphs every punch so much that he wouldn't land anything even against a guy like Provodnikov. He would make Provo look like Willie Pepp.
Oh no. McGregor lost a sparring session to a boxer? A two minute window into a sparring session tells you everything that you need to know about a guy. I guess that means that Spadafora would have killed Floyd because he got the best of him during a sparring session:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKU9PzLwEIM

Oh and then i guess this clip below means that Conor could really defeat The Mountain from Game of Thrones right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aaehn1aY8Ig

I always find it ridiculous when people use a "sparring session" result to form any kind of opinion or stance. #1 it's a training session and you have no idea what this session was geared to, weight loss or technique. #2 you have no idea how many hours had already been put into the session prior. As a collegiate wrestler, i can tell you that there's a BIG difference between sparring and a match. I could put away anyone in sparring but then i wasn't getting work so the key was to keep moving.

Don't be that guy that bases everything off a hidden camera in a stupid training session. It means next to nothing. I actually liked what i saw Conor doing in there in fact. He needs work but IMO, he held his own in many of those exchanges.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 06 Dec 2016, 19:27
by Lackeos
In a boxing match, a top 50 boxer would beat a #1 MMA fighter almost every single time.

Marquez might be at an immense disadvantage due to his size, age, and inactivity. Given that he is 43 years old and has been away from the ring for 2.5 years, it's possible that he may not be able to beat a top 50 welterweight if he were to fight today. If we were talking about 41-year-old Marquez, I would bet on him to dominate McGregor for sure.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 07 Dec 2016, 23:29
by ClivePatrickLyons
Honest to God McGregor would not beat Australia's top 3 Welterweight's in a boxing match :wave: let alone TBE. :oops:

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 08 Dec 2016, 00:54
by p4p1
Lackeos wrote:In a boxing match, a top 50 boxer would beat a #1 MMA fighter almost every single time.

Marquez might be at an immense disadvantage due to his size, age, and inactivity. Given that he is 43 years old and has been away from the ring for 2.5 years, it's possible that he may not be able to beat a top 50 welterweight if he were to fight today. If we were talking about 41-year-old Marquez, I would bet on him to dominate McGregor for sure.
I gotta think if he can take punches from PAC he sure as hell can take McGregors punches.

Re: McGregor vs..

Posted: 08 Dec 2016, 04:44
by Lackeos
p4p1 wrote:
Lackeos wrote:In a boxing match, a top 50 boxer would beat a #1 MMA fighter almost every single time.

Marquez might be at an immense disadvantage due to his size, age, and inactivity. Given that he is 43 years old and has been away from the ring for 2.5 years, it's possible that he may not be able to beat a top 50 welterweight if he were to fight today. If we were talking about 41-year-old Marquez, I would bet on him to dominate McGregor for sure.
I gotta think if he can take punches from PAC he sure as hell can take McGregors punches.
Well I mean... almost 39-year-old Mike Tyson probably wouldn't lose to Kevin McBride either, but he did. Boxing has a rich history of past-prime legends losing fights they could never have possibly lost in their prime. Ali losing to Berbick, Hearns losing to Uriah Grant, Whitaker losing to Carlos Bojorquez, etc..