BoxRec

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/an ... ys-9388650
“Haye’s a good fighter. If I want to fight Haye, I’ll fight Haye. Whether he beats Bellew or not, boxing is not just about who you beat, it’s about if it makes sense and if it makes sense I’ll fight him."

This makes no sense. Who would watch that?

If Haye loses to Bellew, he's a busted flush.

Joshua is a plonker.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:This makes no sense. Who would watch that?

If Haye loses to Bellew, he's a busted flush.

You know you'd watch it and so would I.

Its only joshua responding to haye saying he would love to fight joshua once he has done with bellew. Incidently there's a sky article from bellew who is saying he will KO haye and end Hayes chances of a fight with AJ.

Its all to sell PPV. Don't be surprised if they both have a rumble at the men

jamesmcdonnell wrote:This makes no sense. Who would watch that?

If Haye loses to Bellew, he's a busted flush.

Still better than everyone else that Joshua has fought so far.

Yes, but surely you fight the winner, not the loser?

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yes, but surely you fight the winner, not the loser?

Yes, but would Bellew take that fight?

Horse wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yes, but surely you fight the winner, not the loser?

Yes, but would Bellew take that fight?

]

That's another matter entirely - possibly not, what has that to do with Joshua? Would there be much clamour for a fight between him and Haye if Haye had just lost to Bellew, seems unlikely it would be a big fight.

If Bellew had beaten Haye convincingly why wouldn't he fancy a title shot?

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Horse wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yes, but surely you fight the winner, not the loser?

Yes, but would Bellew take that fight?

]

That's another matter entirely - possibly not, what has that to do with Joshua? Would there be much clamour for a fight between him and Haye if Haye had just lost to Bellew, seems unlikely it would be a big fight.

If Bellew had beaten Haye convincingly why wouldn't he fancy a title shot?

Its a much bigger payday and a victory would cause Bellews confidence to go through the roof, so yes, I imagine he would take the fight.

Not that it is bound to matter, the most likely outcome is for Haye to KO Bellew and target one of the other belts with a view to having a unification against the Joshua/Klitschko winner late next year, before retiring (for good this time)

David Haye - "I'll retire before the age of 31. I had a dream when I was 10.." .....blah blah blah...

It sounded bull when he said it 6 years ago.

Tomasino wrote:Joshua is a plonker.

This is what happens when he expresses his own opinion - no wonder Camp Eddie has to tell him what to say.

Deary me ,, A world champ who's never fought a top 10 fighter , is saying he'll fight a guy if he loses , , Past world champs will be turning in there grave

bripez wrote:

Tomasino wrote:Joshua is a plonker.

This is what happens when he expresses his own opinion - no wonder Camp Eddie has to tell him what to say.

SAPFO wrote:David Haye - "I'll retire before the age of 31. I had a dream when I was 10.." .....blah blah blah...

It sounded bull when he said it 6 years ago.

he's wasted so much of that time