Charlo - JRock
Posted: 10 Dec 2016, 23:28
How the hell is this not the main event?!
Williams down in round 2. Gets up and rocks Charlo. Great fight.
Williams down in round 2. Gets up and rocks Charlo. Great fight.
Southern Californiadiddy wrote:How the hell is this not the main event?!
Williams down in round 2. Gets up and rocks Charlo. Great fight.
J ROCK figured him out, its going to be more clear as rounds go on.diddy wrote:This fight is brutally hard to score.
fornicate, spoke too soon.hulkmaniac wrote:J ROCK figured him out, its going to be more clear as rounds go on.diddy wrote:This fight is brutally hard to score.
JRock either he has no chin or Charlo's power is just unreal.crusader wrote:Always thought JRock was a bit overrated to be honest. He's a strong but pretty basic guy who has been easy to hit, and he doesn't have any wins of note. The best guy he previously fought was probably Centeno, and we saw how hopeless Hugo was against Sulecki.
Charlo is good though, and very big for the division
Charlo's power is good, but within his last four Trout and Finney took him the distance without going down.hulkmaniac wrote:JRock either he has no chin or Charlo's power is just unreal.crusader wrote:Always thought JRock was a bit overrated to be honest. He's a strong but pretty basic guy who has been easy to hit, and he doesn't have any wins of note. The best guy he previously fought was probably Centeno, and we saw how hopeless Hugo was against Sulecki.
Charlo is good though, and very big for the division
Didn't see the Finney fight, but I think Trout's southpaw stance gave him problems.crusader wrote:Charlo's power is good, but within his last four Trout and Finney took him the distance without going down.hulkmaniac wrote:JRock either he has no chin or Charlo's power is just unreal.crusader wrote:Always thought JRock was a bit overrated to be honest. He's a strong but pretty basic guy who has been easy to hit, and he doesn't have any wins of note. The best guy he previously fought was probably Centeno, and we saw how hopeless Hugo was against Sulecki.
Charlo is good though, and very big for the division
Then J Rock must be chinny.crusader wrote:He landed big shots on Finney all night, including those uppercuts. He can obviously crack, but I wouldnt say he's an unreal puncher.


Who in here said that he can't punch? Charlo failing to drop and stop a clubfighter and a good but chinny opponent in two of his last four is perfectly relevant when considering whether he's not simply a puncher ('he can obviously crack'), but an 'unreal' puncher. GGG has stopped nearly 25 straight opponents, hasn't gone the distance in almost a decade, and would have probably been laughed out if he recently couldn't drop or stop people like Trout and Finney; pretty weak comparison there.zorndeslammes wrote:Jermall Charlo can punch. "He didn't knock this guy out one time waaaaaah, J-Rock is super chinny" - christ, Golovkin needed 9 more rounds to KO Kassim Ouma than Agustin Silva and went distance with Amar Amari, I guess his power is overrated too. Pull up the diap.
Can't wait for his brother to be boring as hell again on TV so that boxing fans can collectively go back to calling both bad.
Trout's never been stopped and 3/4 of the internet thought he got robbed against Canelo. What a trash fighter. How hideous that Charlo couldn't KO someone at his level. A+ analysis there.crusader wrote: Who in here said that he can't punch? Charlo failing to drop and stop a clubfighter and a good but chinny opponent in two of his last four is perfectly relevant when considering whether he's not simply a puncher ('he can obviously crack'), but an 'unreal' puncher. GGG has stopped nearly 25 straight opponents, hasn't gone the distance in almost a decade, and would have probably been laughed out if he recently couldn't drop or stop people like Trout and Finney; pretty weak comparison there.
Do you think Shaun George hits harder than David Tua or Vitali Klitschko? One KOed Chris Byrd and the other lost to him. Almost like styles, physical attributes, and career trajectories matter in producing results. No different that in the discussion of Wilder (http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... lit=Wilder) that took place before. Instead of taking any of this into account, you seem to like blanket statements. Bold choice.This reminds me of the time a few questioned whether Wilder's power had been flattered by his poor opposition, and you somehow comprehended that as them suggesting that he couldn't punch at all. I get that you like complaining, but maybe read a little more closely in the future.
There you go missing the point, again. NO ONE here is denying that he has good power; you opened your first post with 'Jermall Charlo can punch', and that point hasn't been contested whatsoever in this thread, just as not one person suggested in the Wilder thread that Deontay can't punch at all. You're wont to moan about positions which no one takes, and if you really think someone here is arguing that Jermall isn't a puncher at least reference the posts.zorndeslammes wrote:Trout's never been stopped and 3/4 of the internet thought he got robbed against Canelo. What a trash fighter. How hideous that Charlo couldn't KO someone at his level. A+ analysis there.crusader wrote: Who in here said that he can't punch? Charlo failing to drop and stop a clubfighter and a good but chinny opponent in two of his last four is perfectly relevant when considering whether he's not simply a puncher ('he can obviously crack'), but an 'unreal' puncher. GGG has stopped nearly 25 straight opponents, hasn't gone the distance in almost a decade, and would have probably been laughed out if he recently couldn't drop or stop people like Trout and Finney; pretty weak comparison there.
Do you think Shaun George hits harder than David Tua or Vitali Klitschko? One KOed Chris Byrd and the other lost to him. Almost like styles, physical attributes, and career trajectories matter in producing results. No different that in the discussion of Wilder (http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... lit=Wilder) that took place before. Instead of taking any of this into account, you seem to like blanket statements. Bold choice.This reminds me of the time a few questioned whether Wilder's power had been flattered by his poor opposition, and you somehow comprehended that as them suggesting that he couldn't punch at all. I get that you like complaining, but maybe read a little more closely in the future.