Page 1 of 1
b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 00:46
by brilo33
now
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 00:47
by Tanzio
Let's use your thread.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 00:47
by skanksta
and with a re-worked, "My Way"

Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 00:49
by brilo33
was b hoping for sid vicious one
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 00:49
by Tanzio
BHop comes in with some pro wrasslers
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 00:57
by Enlightened-One
A lack of activity with Smith Jr. taking the 1st round due to having a superior work-rate.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:01
by Enlightened-One
The scores are 20-18 to Smith Jr., with Hopkins being out worked in the second round.
Hopkins threw a couple of combinations, but they looked horrible technically, with a distinct lack of power.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:06
by Enlightened-One
Hopkins seems unable to let his hands go, but even when he does, the timing and power has gone.
The third round goes to Smith Jr., with the total scores being 30-27 favouring the underdog.
Things are looking bad for the shot executioner, not because he's getting beaten up, but because he's not letting his hands go.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:08
by davie
Enlightened-One wrote:Hopkins seems unable to let his hands go, but even when he does, the timing and power has gone.
The third round goes to Smith Jr., with the total scores being 30-27 favouring the underdog.
Things are looking bad for the shot executioner, not because he's getting beaten up, but because he's not letting his hands go.
I just watched a fight from 12 years ago and it took him 4 rounds to let his hands go then, the old mans biding his time
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:11
by Enlightened-One
It's a case of what your stylistic preference is... a handful of sharp accurate blows landing per round from the veteran or a dozen clumsy speculative blows from relative novice.
I'm favouring the novice by the tiniest of margins.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:12
by davie
Enlightened-One wrote:It's a case of what your stylistic preference is... a handful of sharp accurate blows landing per round from the veteran or a dozen clumsy speculative blows from relative novice.
I'm favouring the novice by the tiniest of margins.
I'm at my work, not even watching it mate
Just got a good feeling for how this will go
Seen this story play out too many times. (cue a Smith KO in round 6

)
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:16
by Enlightened-One
The fifth round goes to Smith Jr., with Hopkins struggling to gain the winning momentum.
For sure, the rounds are difficult to score, depending if you prefer work-rate over savvy veteran quality punches. I'm preferring the more active fighting style adopted by Smith Jr.
49-46 to Smith Jr.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:19
by Enlightened-One
The first half of the fight is over and I'm favouring the work-rate of the younger fighter, with my cards reading 58-56.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:24
by Enlightened-One
Hopkins got punched out of the ring... that was clear and his ankle has gone.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:26
by Enlightened-One
Hopkins is accusing Smith Jr. of pushing him out of the ring, but I didn't see it that way.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:28
by Enlightened-One
It looks like Smith Jr. has gained the victory and he was leading on my scorecards at the time of the stoppage.
Hopkins suffers his first stoppage loss.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:32
by Enlightened-One
The slow motion replay confirmed that Smith Jr. scored a legitimate victory and even appeared to hurt the veteran at the time of him falling through the ropes.
It's a sad way for Hopkins to bow out, especially since he was fairly competitive in this fight.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:35
by skanksta
I had 'The Alien' Bernard 'the Executioner' 'X' 'B-hop' 'the Pensioner' Hopkins 4-3 up going in to R8.
For me he was winning it on defence and punch-picking, but he looked so OLD.
It's over - thanks for the memories.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:35
by Enlightened-One
Dan Rafael had Smith Jr. leading on the scorecards at the time of the stoppage.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:40
by Enlightened-One
Hopkins is making excuses claiming that he frustrated Smith Jr. and this led to the youngster pushing him out of the ring, but surely he'd retract that nonsense claim if he saw the slow-motion replay.
His pride prevents him from seeing the blatantly obvious truth.
Credit to Max Kellerman, he told Hopkins that there wasn't a push.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:41
by Enlightened-One
Hopkins seems very bitter and is manufacturing a nonsense excuse that can clearly be disproved using 20/20 vision.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:46
by Enlightened-One
Right, I'm signing off for the night. It'll be fun reading all the hideously abusive posts about my "unreasonable" real-time commentary of the Hopkins-Smith Jr. fight.
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 01:46
by davie
davie wrote:Enlightened-One wrote:It's a case of what your stylistic preference is... a handful of sharp accurate blows landing per round from the veteran or a dozen clumsy speculative blows from relative novice.
I'm favouring the novice by the tiniest of margins.
I'm at my work, not even watching it mate
Just got a good feeling for how this will go
Seen this story play out too many times. (cue a Smith KO in round 6

)
I almost called that there
Re: b hop v smith jr ring walk
Posted: 18 Dec 2016, 06:07
by Ruthless-RKO
Enlightened-One wrote:Hopkins is accusing Smith Jr. of pushing him out of the ring, but I didn't see it that way.
Typical Bernard Hopkins. Bitching away outside the ring.. like always..