BoxRec

Because Stiverne is a puppet of Haymon and Povetkin is a man's man. Let's hope Ryabinsky fights this treachery and corruption and we can finally see Wilder vs Povetkin, the fight that terrifies Haymon. If Haymon loses Wilder he has nothing. Because Spence and Stevenson are years and years away from being big selling attractions.

Easy because they brought in Duhapas just incase maybe because they already knew Povetkin had tested positive. They might not have told Duhapas that he did either.

Because he didn't want to cancel another payday.

That would mean he wouldn't fight for a year! Also they may have brought in Duhaupas as a replacement before it was anounced. Come on, they must have payed him well.

Who is saying Stiverne is with Haymon? Don King deals with Stiverne

Because Povetkin isn't scared for anyone, no matter how much of a cheat they are.

Also note, that no matter how much dope Stiverne takes, he will never even come close near the skills Povetkin got.

It would have been an easy victory for Povetkin, just like the Wilder match would have been.

If you juice your grandma to the grills, she would still be a hell of a lot less strong as any serious heavyweight boxer out there.

asdfjkl wrote:Because Povetkin isn't scared for anyone, no matter how much of a cheat they are.

Also note, that no matter how much dope Stiverne takes, he will never even come close near the skills Povetkin got.

It would have been an easy victory for Povetkin, just like the Wilder match would have been.

If you juice your grandma to the grills, she would still be a hell of a lot less strong as any serious heavyweight boxer out there.

. . . and bobbing

montrealsuper wrote:Because Stiverne is a puppet of Haymon and Povetkin is a man's man. Let's hope Ryabinsky fights this treachery and corruption and we can finally see Wilder vs Povetkin, the fight that terrifies Haymon. If Haymon loses Wilder he has nothing. Because Spence and Stevenson are years and years away from being big selling attractions.

Stiverne isn't with haymon. Povetkin might be a man's man in the bedroom, in the ring he's shit.

montrealsuper wrote:Why didn't Povetkin cancel the fight when Stiverne tested positive?

This is a rather daft question! The WBC did not withdraw their sanctioning of the bout and the Russian wants an opportunity to face Wilder.

Enlightened-One wrote:

montrealsuper wrote:Why didn't Povetkin cancel the fight when Stiverne tested positive?

This is a rather daft question! The WBC did not withdraw their sanctioning of the bout and the Russian wants an opportunity to face Wilder.

One site said the WBC did withdraw their sanctioning and the reason for Stiverne going home. He claimed there was no reason to fight without the WBC backing of the fight.

world ranked wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

montrealsuper wrote:Why didn't Povetkin cancel the fight when Stiverne tested positive?

This is a rather daft question! The WBC did not withdraw their sanctioning of the bout and the Russian wants an opportunity to face Wilder.

One site said the WBC did withdraw their sanctioning and the reason for Stiverne going home. He claimed there was no reason to fight without the WBC backing of the fight.

Please read the question posed by the thread title and you'll realise the reason for my answer. The WBC didn't remove their sanctioning of the bout until Povetkin failed the test.

Enlightened-One wrote:

world ranked wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: This is a rather daft question! The WBC did not withdraw their sanctioning of the bout and the Russian wants an opportunity to face Wilder.

One site said the WBC did withdraw their sanctioning and the reason for Stiverne going home. He claimed there was no reason to fight without the WBC backing of the fight.

Please read the question posed by the thread title and you'll realise the reason for my answer. The WBC didn't remove their sanctioning of the bout until Povetkin failed the test.

montrealsuper wrote:Because Stiverne is a puppet of Haymon and Povetkin is a man's man. Let's hope Ryabinsky fights this treachery and corruption and we can finally see Wilder vs Povetkin, the fight that terrifies Haymon. If Haymon loses Wilder he has nothing. Because Spence and Stevenson are years and years away from being big selling attractions.

Men's men don't cheat with steroids.

Tony1244 wrote:

montrealsuper wrote:Because Stiverne is a puppet of Haymon and Povetkin is a man's man. Let's hope Ryabinsky fights this treachery and corruption and we can finally see Wilder vs Povetkin, the fight that terrifies Haymon. If Haymon loses Wilder he has nothing. Because Spence and Stevenson are years and years away from being big selling attractions.

Men's men don't cheat with steroids.

Really? Can you name 10 top boxers who don't cheat for certain?

boxing_rocks wrote:

Tony1244 wrote:

montrealsuper wrote:Because Stiverne is a puppet of Haymon and Povetkin is a man's man. Let's hope Ryabinsky fights this treachery and corruption and we can finally see Wilder vs Povetkin, the fight that terrifies Haymon. If Haymon loses Wilder he has nothing. Because Spence and Stevenson are years and years away from being big selling attractions.

Men's men don't cheat with steroids.

Really? Can you name 10 top boxers who don't cheat for certain?

Where did all of these dickriders for this pudgy little man come from? Im not sure if it's funny or terrifying. Proving someone else clean doesn't change that he's perpetually dirty.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Where did all of these dickriders for this pudgy little man come from? Im not sure if it's funny or terrifying. Proving someone else clean doesn't change that he's perpetually dirty.

So are Wilder, Joshua, Klitchko, Stiverne. You can't be an elite athlete now without some help from pharmaceutical industry.

Enlightened-One wrote:

world ranked wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: This is a rather daft question! The WBC did not withdraw their sanctioning of the bout and the Russian wants an opportunity to face Wilder.

One site said the WBC did withdraw their sanctioning and the reason for Stiverne going home. He claimed there was no reason to fight without the WBC backing of the fight.

Please read the question posed by the thread title and you'll realise the reason for my answer. The WBC didn't remove their sanctioning of the bout until Povetkin failed the test.

So, the best question is: why didn't WBC remove their sanctioning in case of Stiverne testing positive and removed it when Povetkin tested positive? They seem to have an agenda.

boxing_rocks wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Where did all of these dickriders for this pudgy little man come from? Im not sure if it's funny or terrifying. Proving someone else clean doesn't change that he's perpetually dirty.

So are Wilder, Joshua, Klitchko, Stiverne. You can't be an elite athlete now without some help from pharmaceutical industry.

Ok

boxing_rocks wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

world ranked wrote:
One site said the WBC did withdraw their sanctioning and the reason for Stiverne going home. He claimed there was no reason to fight without the WBC backing of the fight.

Please read the question posed by the thread title and you'll realise the reason for my answer. The WBC didn't remove their sanctioning of the bout until Povetkin failed the test.

So, the best question is: why didn't WBC remove their sanctioning in case of Stiverne testing positive and removed it when Povetkin tested positive? They seem to have an agenda.

Povetkin just tested dirty before his last scheduled fight. Unlike yours, their agenda appears to be not to suck off the pillow fisted little Russian.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: Please read the question posed by the thread title and you'll realise the reason for my answer. The WBC didn't remove their sanctioning of the bout until Povetkin failed the test.

So, the best question is: why didn't WBC remove their sanctioning in case of Stiverne testing positive and removed it when Povetkin tested positive? They seem to have an agenda.

Povetkin just tested dirty before his last scheduled fight. Unlike yours, their agenda appears to be not to suck off the pillow fisted little Russian.

He did not test dirty in the first case. His level of meldonium was below the threshold legal at that time, and he was fully cleared.

boxing_rocks wrote:So, the best question is: why didn't WBC remove their sanctioning in case of Stiverne testing positive and removed it when Povetkin tested positive? They seem to have an agenda.

This could be the very first time we agree on something.

Even if the WBC don't have an agenda, they should at least explain why they apply their own rules inconsistently when the circumstances superficially appear the same.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Where did all of these dickriders for this pudgy little man come from? Im not sure if it's funny or terrifying. Proving someone else clean doesn't change that he's perpetually dirty.

Is it moreso hate for WIlder and Joshua people think the not legit somehow.

Ruthless-RKO wrote:That would mean he wouldn't fight for a year! Also they may have brought in Duhaupas as a replacement before it was anounced. Come on, they must have payed him well.

Who is saying Stiverne is with Haymon? Don King deals with Stiverne

AH controls Stiverne through King - King has no leverage these days

Enlightened-One wrote:

montrealsuper wrote:Why didn't Povetkin cancel the fight when Stiverne tested positive?

This is a rather daft question! The WBC did not withdraw their sanctioning of the bout and the Russian wants an opportunity to face Wilder.

The WBC is in the pocket of AH just like they used to be in the pocket of King -