Page 1 of 1

It is clearly time for Nino to stop running, hiding and being overly fearful, and face The Executioner. Carpe Diem.

Posted: 06 Jan 2017, 17:44
by BoxBuzz
There is no precedent for any fighter running for this long.

Marshall law should be declared, and Nino should be forced to fight Hopkins.


Here and now.......no more running.....

Otherwise the commission will be complicit and guilty of allowing managers to do as they please.

Fighting who they want to, when they want to.....total unchecked chaos!

This has to be nipped in the bud.

Or.....Gilgamesh, can simply and politely have Nino be "face smashed" by Hopkins in week 11 with no further reason for alarm.

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 06 Jan 2017, 18:48
by gilgamesh
After Tommy Ryan got screwed by the referee against Hopkins I don't think Hopkins deserves a chance at my unbeaten fighter Nino with officials like this in his pocket.

Nino is willing to fight the other 2 guys in your stable. Hopkins only gets a shot at Nino if the Tommy Ryan result gets overturned to the Tech. Win in Tommy's favor it should've been.

Greb would be willing to fight Hopkins in Week 10 if that interests.

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 12:55
by BoxBuzz
The question on the table is

Will Benvenuti Face Hopkins ASAP.......

We will take your somewhat ambiguous answer as an enthusiastic and heartfelt yes, and we rest assured that everyone will see this fight next week.

Or...as soon as you find the internal fortitude to forge forward and do the right thing.

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 14:02
by gilgamesh
Nino would fight GGG in Week 10, Greb would fight Hopkins in Week 10. If those fights don't interest you, you can always go f*ck yourself as a 3rd option. :OhYes:

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 15:20
by Crease
BoxBuzz wrote:There is no precedent for any fighter running for this long.

Marshall law should be declared, and Nino should be forced to fight Hopkins.
In the Republic of Simdom, we do not have any desire to strong-arm Managers in to fights that they are unwilling to take.

There are exceptions of course when it comes to our tourneys.

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 15:28
by Crease
gilgamesh wrote:Hopkins only gets a shot at Nino if the Tommy Ryan result gets overturned to the Tech. Win in Tommy's favor
Unfortunately this is not going to happen. When the Official Reults threads go up, the results are carved in to stone. Then we move on to the next week...

But I ask you, what is the best way forward to proceed?
If you want to claim vengeance for the honour & glory of your stable, you have three steadfast soldiers willing to put it all on the line for you 'till their last breaths...

Or you continue as you are, complaining about results past, continually refusing challenges...

No-one can or will force you to take a bout that you dont want but only you can decide which is the progressive yet daring way forward.

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 16:31
by gilgamesh
Crease wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Hopkins only gets a shot at Nino if the Tommy Ryan result gets overturned to the Tech. Win in Tommy's favor
Unfortunately this is not going to happen. When the Official Reults threads go up, the results are carved in to stone. Then we move on to the next week...

But I ask you, what is the best way forward to proceed?
If you want to claim vengeance for the honour & glory of your stable, you have three steadfast soldiers willing to put it all on the line for you 'till their last breaths...

Or you continue as you are, complaining about results past, continually refusing challenges...

No-one can or will force you to take a bout that you dont want but only you can decide which is the progressive yet daring way forward.
I've already decided it. Did you not see the fights offered to BoxBuzz in this very thread? If you wanna keep up with the sassing me Nino can hand Julian Jackson an ass whooping too punk :box:

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 22:58
by BoxBuzz
Crease, there's plenty of money in the envelope this week. Just force Gilgamoose to have Nino face Hopkins.

If not, the cash flow will come to an abrupt and complete stop.

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 23:01
by gilgamesh
BoxBuzz wrote:Crease, there's plenty of money in the envelope this week. Just force Gilgamoose to have Nino face Hopkins.

If not, the cash flow will come to an abrupt and complete stop.
Attempted bribery...shameful :shame:

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 07 Jan 2017, 23:03
by gilgamesh
As you all can plainly see. Nino has offered to fight GGG who is ranked higher than Hopkins, but because of Buzz's attempted bribery we're not sure that any fight with his stable would be officiated impartially.

One could almost make a case that Buzz's fighter Hopkins is deserving of a 1 or 2 week suspension as a result of his attempted bribery.

Much like the shady doings of Panama Lewis called his entire career into question, I would say that the shady doings of Hopkins here calls a lot of his career into question. Like that gift decision against Canelo, and the Referee ruling a headbutt cut a TKO victory for Hopkins in the Tommy Ryan fight. It all makes sense now. There's been "plenty of money in the envelope" for a few officials this season from Golden Buzz Promotions I think.

Re: Commish should require Benvenuti be brought to Hopkins in chains if needed.

Posted: 09 Jan 2017, 23:08
by BoxBuzz
Sir, we are the most honest organization in the game. We are so squeaky clean that we can jest and boast about compromised behavior and everyone gets a belly laugh at the very thought.

There has never been a truer and kinder, and more respectful and considerate, organizational conglomerate, in the recorded history of simulated pugilism..

Now do what is right.....all we ask is that Nino fight Hopkins.....if this is too much for a manager to ask, then fine, I will direct you to do so.

And in addition..... do this without delay, do this with NO belly achin', and do this with an upbeat spirited enthusiasm for the 3 chances that your fighter may have in such a fair and square ordeal.

1. Slim
2. Fat
3. None

Re: It is clearly time for Nino to stop running, hiding and being overly fearful, and face The Executioner. Carpe Diem.

Posted: 09 Jan 2017, 23:54
by gilgamesh
The brief 2 fight one upping Hopkins tour begins in Week 10 and ends after Week 11. In Week 12 we will make a statement in regards to Hopkins. Until then you can watch Nino on tour....one upping your fighter.

Re: It is clearly time for Nino to stop running, hiding and being overly fearful, and face The Executioner. Carpe Diem.

Posted: 10 Jan 2017, 12:35
by BoxBuzz
gilgamesh wrote:The brief 2 fight one upping Hopkins tour begins in Week 10 and ends after Week 11. In Week 12 we will make a statement in regards to Hopkins. Until then you can watch Nino on tour....one upping your fighter.
You sir, are choosing a path fraught with peril.

Re: It is clearly time for Nino to stop running, hiding and being overly fearful, and face The Executioner. Carpe Diem.

Posted: 10 Jan 2017, 14:24
by gilgamesh
BoxBuzz wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:The brief 2 fight one upping Hopkins tour begins in Week 10 and ends after Week 11. In Week 12 we will make a statement in regards to Hopkins. Until then you can watch Nino on tour....one upping your fighter.
You sir, are choosing a path fraught with peril.
You don't even know what the path is.

Re: It is clearly time for Nino to stop running, hiding and being overly fearful, and face The Executioner. Carpe Diem.

Posted: 12 Jan 2017, 22:04
by BoxBuzz
now you are just acting path-etic.