Sky have stepped up!
Posted: 15 Jan 2017, 08:29
Last night was brilliant, Frampton- Santa Cruz can't miss, credit where it's due, I've slagged them off for years....
They showed it, that's all I'm bothered about.Supremo wrote:What role did Sky or matchroom have in putting that show together???
Complete joke. Smith saw the hate for Halling and used it as an opportunity to get himself back in commentary. He's an absolute tosser. Ruins fights with his commentary. Then you have the Smiths who are tedious to watch and listen to.MightyWarrior wrote:Shame their production values are so utter shite. Smith with his godawful growling completely unable to read a fight, Smith brothers complete bores, and that new air headed studio presenter giving away the result of the first & best fight of the night before they showed it, what a numpty.
Embarrassing. Halling was crap, but the idea should have been to replace him with a legitimate commentator, not for Smith to insert himself back into that position. How many other heads of sport on Sky decide they are going to do the commentary?TheLeprechaun wrote:Complete joke. Smith saw the hate for Halling and used it as an opportunity to get himself back in commentary. He's an absolute tosser. Ruins fights with his commentary. Then you have the Smiths who are tedious to watch and listen to.MightyWarrior wrote:Shame their production values are so utter shite. Smith with his godawful growling completely unable to read a fight, Smith brothers complete bores, and that new air headed studio presenter giving away the result of the first & best fight of the night before they showed it, what a numpty.
I'm sure they all enjoyed the nice week out in NYC.
They litrally had zero to do with that. Your giving them credit for doing the bare minimum. A Brit in matchoom stable in a unification......of course they should be showing it, what do you pay your subscription for?mickey1975 wrote:Last night was brilliant, Frampton- Santa Cruz can't miss, credit where it's due, I've slagged them off for years....
Bristolcityfc1 wrote:They still showed annoying ads between rounds-Presenter though was easy on the eye
I was thinking the same rio,degale is a matchroom fighter. Credit for getting frampton but i just hope smith isnt the commentator "i remember tyson done the same against lou savarese" wtf is that clown goin on about? Tyson had rocked lou and carried on hittin him when john coyle jumped in between them,he didnt throw a punch after the bell and coyle didnt take it flush in the face. Smith is an idiot,im sick of him. Paulie maliggnagi should replace himrio wrote:They litrally had zero to do with that. Your giving them credit for doing the bare minimum. A Brit in matchoom stable in a unification......of course they should be showing it, what do you pay your subscription for?mickey1975 wrote:Last night was brilliant, Frampton- Santa Cruz can't miss, credit where it's due, I've slagged them off for years....
How complicated was it to get the android boxes set up?rhino222 wrote:me too, i paid for a few ppvs and realised i was paying to watch adverts. now i have bt vision and my android boxes. i do not miss a punch on any show, i get the lot.
Jesus wept what do you get for 83 quid?jamesmcdonnell wrote:How complicated was it to get the android boxes set up?rhino222 wrote:me too, i paid for a few ppvs and realised i was paying to watch adverts. now i have bt vision and my android boxes. i do not miss a punch on any show, i get the lot.
I'm sick of paying Virgin 83 quid a month.
Hopefully a blow job from Adam Smith....jameswilson wrote:Jesus wept what do you get for 83 quid?jamesmcdonnell wrote:How complicated was it to get the android boxes set up?rhino222 wrote:me too, i paid for a few ppvs and realised i was paying to watch adverts. now i have bt vision and my android boxes. i do not miss a punch on any show, i get the lot.
I'm sick of paying Virgin 83 quid a month.
Broadband, TV XL, allegedly, phone rental.jameswilson wrote:Jesus wept what do you get for 83 quid?jamesmcdonnell wrote:How complicated was it to get the android boxes set up?rhino222 wrote:me too, i paid for a few ppvs and realised i was paying to watch adverts. now i have bt vision and my android boxes. i do not miss a punch on any show, i get the lot.
I'm sick of paying Virgin 83 quid a month.
Tv XL?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Broadband, TV XL, allegedly, phone rental.jameswilson wrote:Jesus wept what do you get for 83 quid?jamesmcdonnell wrote:
How complicated was it to get the android boxes set up?
I'm sick of paying Virgin 83 quid a month.
It's their largest package, with all the channels, plus TIVO box.jameswilson wrote:Tv XL?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Broadband, TV XL, allegedly, phone rental.jameswilson wrote:
Jesus wept what do you get for 83 quid?
Smith ruins fights he has no idea what is going on.hallling and watt are sorely missed.and what is this obsession with the smith brothers is adam their bastard half brother?TheLeprechaun wrote:Complete joke. Smith saw the hate for Halling and used it as an opportunity to get himself back in commentary. He's an absolute tosser. Ruins fights with his commentary. Then you have the Smiths who are tedious to watch and listen to.MightyWarrior wrote:Shame their production values are so utter shite. Smith with his godawful growling completely unable to read a fight, Smith brothers complete bores, and that new air headed studio presenter giving away the result of the first & best fight of the night before they showed it, what a numpty.
I'm sure they all enjoyed the nice week out in NYC.
I'm paying them about that and that's SINCE I've cancelled my Sky Sports. Was going to have it back on for Frampton but I'm getting used to paying that and not nearly £120!! Not sure what to do to be honest.jamesmcdonnell wrote:How complicated was it to get the android boxes set up?rhino222 wrote:me too, i paid for a few ppvs and realised i was paying to watch adverts. now i have bt vision and my android boxes. i do not miss a punch on any show, i get the lot.
I'm sick of paying Virgin 83 quid a month.