BoxRec

Has Mike "Joke" Stewart been confirmed as Hatton's next opponent.

yes :x

WHAT A BIG STEAMY PILE OF SHITE.

Cue a deserved and big kicking from (Mr)Blue.

So much for Hatton wanting a big name next and walking if he doesn't get one. I can't wait to hear his spin on this.
Stewart lost to Sharmba Mitchell by scores of 117-109, 120-106 and 120-105.

i know i was ringside, he was crap, caught shamba once in round five i think it was, that was more or less it, he hit the canvass more times than he hit mitchell.

Ahh this is just so piss poor. Needless to say I wont be going so thats a good few hundred theyve lost cos I usually get a few people together.

I iurge people to vote with thier feet, if anyonre is thinking of attending this sham.

think ill put my heart and soul behind Haye now, Im sick of defending hatton.

Well I'm sure he will say its a means to an end and that Frank will get him
the winner of Tsyzu v Mitchell. Whether people believe him or not is a differient story.

i know what they are doing.

a) they think Zoo will beat mitchell and he will move up to welterweight leaving Hatton not paying purse bid fee if the title is vacant for his to fight the number 2 contender

b) think that mitchell will beat zoo and they can get mitchell over here.

pathetic.. one farce after another with that bunch.. really trying not to care anymore, but its easier said than done.

This'll be the spin; Stewart is actually a big name. Bigger than Gatti, Tszyu, Witter, Judah, Cotto, Harris and Urkal. Sadly not as big as Mitchell, Mayweather or Spadafora though.

Warren of course will fail to mention it's the number of letters he's talking about, leading to a state of mass confusion amongst Hatton's loyal fans.

Hatton has been ranked number one by the WBA and I think got as high as number two with the WBC. So fighting for a number one slot with the IBF don't mean shit. He's another Calzaghe, He talks of a genuine title shot but has become engrained in the lesser title culture and will never break out of it.

yes it starting to look that way, for ex Ottke opponents , substitute ex Mitchell opp.

im disgusted.

J wrote:yes it stating to look that way, for ex Oyyke opponents , substitute ex Mitchell opp.

im disgusted.

He likes fighting ex-Mitchell opponents: Vince Phillips had just lost to Mitchell when he fought Hatton. Ben Tackie had just been trounced (and floored) by Mitchell prior to meeting Hatton.
And now Stewart.

Don't forget Vilches, he got blown away by Mitchell too.

Kilburn wrote:Don't forget Vilches, he got blown away by Mitchell too.

Yes, Vilches, too. Good one Kilburn. Despite all the recent talk about Hatton stepping up, this proves absolutely nothing has changed in the way they choose Hatton opponents.
Can anyone remember when the Harris fight was announced and lirva33 enquired about buying tickets before they sold out? We told lirva33 to hang fire because the fight would probably fall through.

So from

Calzaghe v Johnson & Hatton v Harris

we went to

Calzaghe v Nobody & Hatton v Vilches

from

Calzaghe v Woods & Hatton v Harris

we went to

Calzaghe v Pemeberton? & Hatton v Stewart

Thank god for Haye v Thompson

and Williams v Tyson.

It really is very hard to defend the indefensible. I am going to have to call it like it is in my next article I fear, it's gone beyond the 'let's just wait and see' period, I'm arsed off with it all....

American Football scenario - the winners of the NFC end up facing a team in the Superbowl that got hammered in the AFC final 50-0.

Football scenario - Man U win their FA Cup semi and end up facing Rotherham who were beat 9-0 in their semi by Arsenal.

Tennis scenario - Roger Federer wins his semi and ends up facing a bloke who got beat in straight sets in his semi. Probably Tim Henman.

This is what we are getting with Hatton-Stewart. They should have gone to purse bids with Harris and bid fornicate all, gone to wherever Manny wanted it and smashed him to bits, as I said a while back. This stinks.

If it is Stewart, I for one will be interested to see how this affects ticket sales. After all, this is the first occasion (as far as I'm aware) where Hatton will be facing a guy that his 20,000 or so followers will already have seen lose to Mitchell comprehensively.
Normally the wool can be pulled over their eyes with regards to opponents as they're not hardcore fight fans, but they will have seen Stewart's limitations with their own eyes. Will they still be willing to put their hands in their pockets...?

Sadly yes. However, Hatton doesn't get 20,000 every time he fights, the standard seating is I think 16,000, and Hatton more or less fills that. The record attendance for a sporting event there was Tyson v Francis, where they got 19,700 I think, and that apparently was with people sitting in the aisles.

glittermonkey wrote:This'll be the spin; Stewart is actually a big name. Bigger than Gatti, Tszyu, Witter, Judah, Cotto, Harris and Urkal. Sadly not as big as Mitchell, Mayweather or Spadafora though.

Warren of course will fail to mention it's the number of letters he's talking about, leading to a state of mass confusion amongst Hatton's loyal fans.

:D:D

Quality.