Page 1 of 1
Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 09:28
by Mimmy
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 09:30
by Stuarty
Horrible fight! Glad it's off.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 09:42
by BigGar
Maybe a chance for Cotto v Brook? Would save having to fight Spence and Cotto could be sold as this gigantic star, despite being years past his best.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 09:44
by sweetscience
BigGar wrote:Maybe a chance for Cotto v Brook? Would save having to fight Spence and Cotto could be sold as this gigantic star, despite being years past his best.
I think % would cause a stumbling block on that one
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 09:54
by Boxerbeetle
Poor fight, don't care that it's off tbh.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 10:45
by Ruthless-RKO
I was kinda looking forward to Rigo vs. Flores.. No news on that yet?
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 12:41
by ElJefe
Would have been a few decent rounds of action but the winner was inevitable. Would like to see Cotto in with some top fighters but you get the feeling he wants to wind down with a couple of easier fights for good money before retirement.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 13:09
by Horse
BigGar wrote:Maybe a chance for Cotto v Brook? Would save having to fight Spence and Cotto could be sold as this gigantic star, despite being years past his best.
Brook vs Kirkland is more likely.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 19:12
by boybrooks
Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 22:39
by Finn
boybrooks wrote:Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
Was thinking the same thing.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 04:35
by Andrew
Finn wrote:boybrooks wrote:Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
Was thinking the same thing.

Cotto isn't going to fight Saunders. 2 reasons.
1) Cotto does not fight at 160 the Kirkland fight was at 153.
2) Saunders next fight is against Khurtsidze the WBO called the mandatory and goes to purse bids next week if they don't do a deal.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 04:38
by Stuarty
Naandrew wrote:Finn wrote:boybrooks wrote:Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
Was thinking the same thing.

Cotto isn't going to fight Saunders. 2 reasons.
1) Cotto does not fight at 160 the Kirkland fight was at 153.
2) Saunders next fight is against Khurtsidze the WBO called the mandatory and goes to purse bids next week if they don't do a deal.
I think I've just about lost all interest in BJS! The guy is a slabbering moron!
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 05:18
by Stuarty
Kro wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:I think I've just about lost all interest in BJS! The guy is a slabbering moron!
Reported for racism
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Fair enough! Sorry Billy
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 16:39
by jamesmcdonnell
Kro wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Fair enough! Sorry Billy
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
QUIZ SHOWS!!
I love omar djalilli.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 20:14
by brilo33
Miguel Angel Cotto vs Antonio Margarito the trilogy