BoxRec

battle of the weak punchers, who tha weakest hahahahaha

this fight was coming to my mind, i saw a vid on yutub and it was saying how hard adrien was punching the heavybag and when i saw it, i was totaly unimpressed, shocked a bit how weak his punches were. it is so funny, cause he is acting like he is training hard, when in reality he only gives 60 %, 70 % at best. timmy always in discussion when it comes down to weak punchers, its a shame, cause timmy is a hard working dedicated boxer, i hav rarely seen boxers train as hard as he did, always pushing for 100 %, had t more power, he would wreck guys left and right, arguably top 3 p4p.

id say timmy wins by close descision, simply moving more, landing more clear shots, a similar fight to what he did against marquez.

Lol, an expert that still thinks broner has a chance at that level?

Broner is a lot of things, but I wouldn't consider him a weak puncher.

Anyhow, Desert Storm UD. However, I could see Timothy getting knocked down somewhere in the fight.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Lol, an expert that still thinks broner has a chance at that level?

timmy is overrated
the funny thing is, that it realy comes down to a training problem of broner. a fully focused, fully trained broner beats the shit out of timmy. picking him appart, hurting him. but 60 % ab vs 100 % t, i go with t

Jip wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Lol, an expert that still thinks broner has a chance at that level?

timmy is overrated
the funny thing is, that it realy comes down to a training problem of broner. a fully focused, fully trained broner beats the poo out of timmy. picking him appart, hurting him. but 60 % ab vs 100 % t, i go with t

How is he overrated?

Impractical Poster wrote:Broner is a lot of things, but I wouldn't consider him a weak puncher.

Anyhow, Desert Storm UD. However, I could see Timothy getting knocked down somewhere in the fight.

you right. but compared to thurman, spence, even porter and brook i find ab a weak puncher. certainly the 60 % version that shows up all the time. the young 80 % trained broner was wrecking guys, but his training atitude and moving up so fast broke all down.

Impractical Poster wrote:

Jip wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Lol, an expert that still thinks broner has a chance at that level?

timmy is overrated
the funny thing is, that it realy comes down to a training problem of broner. a fully focused, fully trained broner beats the poo out of timmy. picking him appart, hurting him. but 60 % ab vs 100 % t, i go with t

How is he overrated?

some people put him in a p4p top 20, when to me he is top 50. he isnt even top 5 in his own division. brook, porter, spence, pac, khan, garcia would all beat him, even ab would his fat ass only train hard beat tim.

Jip wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Lol, an expert that still thinks broner has a chance at that level?

timmy is overrated
the funny thing is, that it realy comes down to a training problem of broner. a fully focused, fully trained broner beats the poo out of timmy. picking him appart, hurting him. but 60 % ab vs 100 % t, i go with t

Tim Bradley would win no doubt in my mind. I think it'd be a pretty lopsided fight with Timmy winning 117-111 or wider. He'd dominate Broner.

1. AB isn't a weak puncher. Just ask Porter in that last round
2. Bradley would beat Broner in a similar way that Porter did. Bradley's will to win and ability to move and do everything well would prevail.

Jip wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:Broner is a lot of things, but I wouldn't consider him a weak puncher.

Anyhow, Desert Storm UD. However, I could see Timothy getting knocked down somewhere in the fight.

you right. but compared to thurman, spence, even porter and brook i find ab a weak puncher. certainly the 60 % version that shows up all the time. the young 80 % trained broner was wrecking guys, but his training atitude and moving up so fast broke all down.

He isn't the puncher those guys are, but he isn't a weak puncher. Maidana wasn't exactly walking through everything he through.

IKSRTFO wrote:

Jip wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:Broner is a lot of things, but I wouldn't consider him a weak puncher.

Anyhow, Desert Storm UD. However, I could see Timothy getting knocked down somewhere in the fight.

you right. but compared to thurman, spence, even porter and brook i find ab a weak puncher. certainly the 60 % version that shows up all the time. the young 80 % trained broner was wrecking guys, but his training atitude and moving up so fast broke all down.

He isn't the puncher those guys are, but he isn't a weak puncher. Maidana wasn't exactly walking through everything he through.

to me he weak

Jip wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:

Jip wrote:

timmy is overrated
the funny thing is, that it realy comes down to a training problem of broner. a fully focused, fully trained broner beats the poo out of timmy. picking him appart, hurting him. but 60 % ab vs 100 % t, i go with t

How is he overrated?

some people put him in a p4p top 20, when to me he is top 50. he isnt even top 5 in his own division. brook, porter, spence, pac, khan, garcia would all beat him, even ab would his fat ass only train hard beat tim.

Based on what? The only one who convicingly beat him was Pacquiao, a top level fighter. And he's more proven on the top level than all of those guys.

Bradley would out work/out will Broner to win a decision, 116-112 range...

IKSRTFO wrote:

Jip wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote: How is he overrated?

some people put him in a p4p top 20, when to me he is top 50. he isnt even top 5 in his own division. brook, porter, spence, pac, khan, garcia would all beat him, even ab would his fat ass only train hard beat tim.

Based on what? The only one who convicingly beat him was Pacquiao, a top level fighter. And he's more proven on the top level than all of those guys.

based on height, reach, power and being naturaly bigger than timmy aka the midget

Bradley by comfortable ud. One is a real pro, the other a complete jerkoff who was knocking c rate dudes out at 130.

Impractical Poster wrote:Broner is a lot of things, but I wouldn't consider him a weak puncher.

Anyhow, Desert Storm UD. However, I could see Timothy getting knocked down somewhere in the fight.

Agree. Nothing wrong with Porters chin and he had him in trouble late on.

Jip wrote:

IKSRTFO wrote:

Jip wrote:

some people put him in a p4p top 20, when to me he is top 50. he isnt even top 5 in his own division. brook, porter, spence, pac, khan, garcia would all beat him, even ab would his fat ass only train hard beat tim.

Based on what? The only one who convicingly beat him was Pacquiao, a top level fighter. And he's more proven on the top level than all of those guys.

based on height, reach, power and being naturaly bigger than timmy aka the midget

1. AB isn't bigger than Bradley.
2. In fact, they're probably less than an inch apart in height
3. Boxrec reports both their reaches to be 69"
4. Bradley has beaten much bigger punchers than Broner