BoxRec

Ya'll got Beterbiev?

Got a feeling Ward may vacate IBF to allow these two to fight for it, that is if his ambition is to retire.

bert all day. final fight before he take on either kov or ad

Huh? Alvarez is fighting Bute Friday.

You mean Barrera.

Blodhemn wrote:You mean Barrera.

That's the expert, bringing the hit scoop weeks later.

It's Barrera vs Beterbiev, not Alvarez. Seemingly confirmed for April 21st in Miami.

Good fight - Beterbiev is a beast - He's ready to Tysonize the LH division -

TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.

You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?

The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.

You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?

The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.

Neither actually you mongrel.

Apologies to everyone apart from the mongrel.

I was looking at betting odds on Alvarez bs Bute and accidentally mixed he and Barrera, my bad, don't know how to edit the thread name?
New to this forum.

Edit; got it.

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.

You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?

The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.

Maybe if you'd stop being an angry little man, attempting to belittle people on this board for not being failed lawyers or prized fiction writers like yourself, you'd then feel better. Son.

TheGingerBomber wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.

You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?

The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.

Actually you mongrel.

It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".

So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.

By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?

The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.

Actually you mongrel.

It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".

So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.

By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.

I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!

TheGingerBomber wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:
Actually you mongrel.

It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".

So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.

By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.

I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!

That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!

By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.

The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.

Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".

So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.

By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.

I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!

That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!

By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.

The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.

Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.

Was just a little something to lighten the mood, you're clearly a bit angry, why can't we all get along? After all you must be highly religious with a name like that.

I already mentioned why I got it wrong, I admitted my mistake.

However this fight was confirmed at the time I wrote this thread. It was in negotiation but there was substantial rumours that the fight may not take place with stumbling blocks in place.
Now the fight is confirmed with a date announced.
So, now we're both wrong.
The reason for me wearing the trousers in this relationship is, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong, where as you're not.

TheGingerBomber wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:
I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!

That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!

By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.

The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.

Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.

Was just a little something to lighten the mood, you're clearly a bit angry, why can't we all get along? After all you must be highly religious with a name like that.

I already mentioned why I got it wrong, I admitted my mistake.

However this fight was confirmed at the time I wrote this thread. It was in negotiation but there was substantial rumours that the fight may not take place with stumbling blocks in place.
Now the fight is confirmed with a date announced.
So, now we're both wrong.
The reason for me wearing the trousers in this relationship is, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong, where as you're not.

It's good to know that me correcting your mistakes helped you feel like a "man", after realising you were wrong.

Enlightened-One wrote:

TheGingerBomber wrote:

Enlightened-One wrote: That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!

By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.

The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.

Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.

Was just a little something to lighten the mood, you're clearly a bit angry, why can't we all get along? After all you must be highly religious with a name like that.

I already mentioned why I got it wrong, I admitted my mistake.

However this fight was confirmed at the time I wrote this thread. It was in negotiation but there was substantial rumours that the fight may not take place with stumbling blocks in place.
Now the fight is confirmed with a date announced.
So, now we're both wrong.
The reason for me wearing the trousers in this relationship is, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong, where as you're not.

It's good to know that me correcting your mistakes helped you feel like a "man", after realising you were wrong.

I was corrected before you came along, and with less hostility too! But I'll forgive you.

Another excellent addition to what is shaping up to be a strong first half of the boxing year.