Povetkin vs Ortiz - who wins this match ?
Posted: 31 Mar 2017, 12:03
I'd love to see this match. Both are old-dangerous-avoided HW's. They should be matched together ASAP. 
40+ ? How the fuk he could hide that on papers ?Loki wrote:Ortiz has looked woeful in his last two fights. Rumours that he is a lot older than recorded. Povetkin beats him IMO.
He defected, I doubt Cuba goes out of it's way to provide all the paper work on people who defect.apollo creed wrote:40+ ? How the fuk he could hide that on papers ?Loki wrote:Ortiz has looked woeful in his last two fights. Rumours that he is a lot older than recorded. Povetkin beats him IMO.
Was mention made of a time machine in the OP?IT wrote:The juiced off his tits Povetkin or the one that fought Marco Huck?
..he might be, but how is Ortiz better in this respect?Ossyrules wrote:Potvetkin doesn't deserve any pays days,
Publicity or even talked about on here. He's a disgrace.
Well it's king of relevant to the original question.punchoutsb wrote:Was mention made of a time machine in the OP?IT wrote:The juiced off his tits Povetkin or the one that fought Marco Huck?
Not even slightly relevant.IT wrote:Well it's king of relevant to the original question.punchoutsb wrote:Was mention made of a time machine in the OP?IT wrote:The juiced off his tits Povetkin or the one that fought Marco Huck?
No mention of who would win this fight five years ago. Neither were "old-dangerous-avoided HW's" five years ago.apollo creed wrote:I'd love to see this match. Both are old-dangerous-avoided HW's. They should be matched together ASAP.
So Povetkin either being on steroids or not being on steroids has no relevance in his chances with facing off against Ortiz? I'd imagine his chances would increase in the case of the former. Hence it's relevant.punchoutsb wrote:Not even slightly relevant.IT wrote:Well it's king of relevant to the original question.punchoutsb wrote:
Was mention made of a time machine in the OP?
No mention of who would win this fight five years ago. Neither were "old-dangerous-avoided HW's" five years ago.apollo creed wrote:I'd love to see this match. Both are old-dangerous-avoided HW's. They should be matched together ASAP.
The Povetkin that fought Marco Huck existed in 2012. It's 2017, time to update your wall calendar.IT wrote:So Povetkin either being on steroids or not being on steroids has no relevance in his chances with facing off against Ortiz? I'd imagine his chances would increase in the case of the former. Hence it's relevant.punchoutsb wrote:Not even slightly relevant.IT wrote: Well it's king of relevant to the original question.
No mention of who would win this fight five years ago. Neither were "old-dangerous-avoided HW's" five years ago.apollo creed wrote:I'd love to see this match. Both are old-dangerous-avoided HW's. They should be matched together ASAP.
He's been caught lessgreg wrote:..he might be, but how is Ortiz better in this respect?Ossyrules wrote:Potvetkin doesn't deserve any pays days,
Publicity or even talked about on here. He's a disgrace.
I think it was Tony Bellew who, while fighting in the amateurs met Ortiz. He was a fully grown man whilst Tony was very young and green. There have been plenty of accounts to state that Ortiz is a lot older than his papers suggest and with Cuba being somewhat closed, records of defectors can always be doctored.punchoutsb wrote:He defected, I doubt Cuba goes out of it's way to provide all the paper work on people who defect.apollo creed wrote:40+ ? How the fuk he could hide that on papers ?Loki wrote:Ortiz has looked woeful in his last two fights. Rumours that he is a lot older than recorded. Povetkin beats him IMO.
Maybe. It is quite a unique concept to become a significantly harder puncher in your mid to late 30's however.punchoutsb wrote:The Povetkin that fought Marco Huck existed in 2012. It's 2017, time to update your wall calendar.IT wrote:So Povetkin either being on steroids or not being on steroids has no relevance in his chances with facing off against Ortiz? I'd imagine his chances would increase in the case of the former. Hence it's relevant.punchoutsb wrote:
Not even slightly relevant.
No mention of who would win this fight five years ago. Neither were "old-dangerous-avoided HW's" five years ago.
Bellew talks nonsense. Bellew himself didn't start boxing until he was about 15 and thus he was probably 17 or something and Ortiz was about 21 at the time.Loki wrote:I think it was Tony Bellew who, while fighting in the amateurs met Ortiz. He was a fully grown man whilst Tony was very young and green. There have been plenty of accounts to state that Ortiz is a lot older than his papers suggest and with Cuba being somewhat closed, records of defectors can always be doctored.punchoutsb wrote:He defected, I doubt Cuba goes out of it's way to provide all the paper work on people who defect.apollo creed wrote:
40+ ? How the fuk he could hide that on papers ?
This is also true with African fighters and footballers. e.g. Sam Peter, Samuel Eto and Yakubu.
Very well said! This is a mouthwatering fight that should happen asap.candyslim wrote:PEDS or no PEDS I would dearly love to see a fight between these two. I guess it depends on whether the Allen and Scott fights are evidence that Ortiz is on the slide, or maybe Ortiz was consciously trying to look less formidable in order to coax one of the title holders to face him. Ortiz of a couple of fights ago looked mightily impressive, and how awesome did Povtkin look in destroying the tough and durable Duhaupas, even allowing for the fact Duhaupas had just stepped off the plane, and that AP has been allegedly enjoying the benefit of a pharmaceutical pick-me-up ?
So I'm firmly on the fence with this one. Sorry if that seems like a cop-out but it's because I can't see it as anything other than a genuine 50/50 that makes this so deliciously mouth-watering to me. I know I should despise a drug-cheat and on one level I do, but another part of me drools over the new improved Povetkin with the (alleged) added formula, and burns with a desire to see him fight Wilder, Joshua, Ortiz or Parker.
Sorry I'm a flawed boxing junkie, what can I say?