Luke Campbell vs Darleys Perez
Posted: 10 Apr 2017, 10:45
Campbell's team targeting the WBA and Linares fight. The fight may form as an eliminator to fight for that belt
I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.Stuffs wrote:Perez was robbed on the undercard of Ward-Kovalev against Mo Hooker.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
What robberies have you seen in recent years?Nightmare Roy wrote:I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.Stuffs wrote:Perez was robbed on the undercard of Ward-Kovalev against Mo Hooker.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
Ok moody house score cardsOssyrules wrote:What robberies have you seen in recent years?Nightmare Roy wrote:I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.Stuffs wrote:Perez was robbed on the undercard of Ward-Kovalev against Mo Hooker.
It's a good one for Campbell though.
McDonnells last title defence was just as bad a decision I can think of from the top of my head but I'm questioning if that is even a robbery. Poor decision yes, robbery, not convinced
Fair one for that then. I do think that some of the scorecards in England don't mirror what I'm seeing, but a lot of the time it's foreign judges.Nightmare Roy wrote:Ok moody house score cardsOssyrules wrote:What robberies have you seen in recent years?Nightmare Roy wrote: I saw that, they called it a draw, he won every round almost, worse than any of the robberies I've seen in the UK in recent years and that's saying something! Should be a good fight.
McDonnells last title defence was just as bad a decision I can think of from the top of my head but I'm questioning if that is even a robbery. Poor decision yes, robbery, not convinced
Naandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
Apparently it was ordered by the ebu but campbell pulled outNaandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
Disgraceful if so.rio wrote:No
Apparently it was ordered by the ebu but campbell pulled outNaandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
He was ranked at light welterweight by the WBA at no.6 so it's no big surprise he's now ranked at lightweight considering he's a previous belt holder. Are you sure he's moved to number 1 at lightweight? I'd be surprised if that was the case. I'm pretty sure it's purely an eliminator for the no1 spot (which is now open following Petrov's loss).Naandrew wrote:Perez was not rated by the WBA last month then this months he returned to the rankings at number 1
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
I wouldn't say it's disgraceful - I think Campbell is (rightly or wrongly) looking past the EBU belt now. He'll probably be looking for a title shot at the backend of the year.Naandrew wrote:Disgraceful if so.rio wrote:No
Apparently it was ordered by the ebu but campbell pulled outNaandrew wrote:Perez has not made the weight for 17 months and is fighting at three weeks notice. This is poor
Why isn't Campbell rematching Mendy
Hearn should have made the Cardle fight and refused to work with Cardle when Joe Gallagher Inevitably turned it down
Luke Campbell wanted that fight to make history for Hull. Would have been perfect for this card. Instead Cardle is having a soft. Touch to win the belt outright what an embarrassment
maverick23 wrote:He was ranked at light welterweight by the WBA at no.6 so it's no big surprise he's now ranked at lightweight considering he's a previous belt holder. Are you sure he's moved to number 1 at lightweight? I'd be surprised if that was the case. I'm pretty sure it's purely an eliminator for the no1 spot (which is now open following Petrov's loss).Naandrew wrote:Perez was not rated by the WBA last month then this months he returned to the rankings at number 1
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
Campbell wanted it because no fighter from Hull has been British champion but Joe Gallagher wouldn't let Cardle fight him.keirw wrote:With the Mendy rematch looking less and less likely I'm glad Campbell at least has a meaningful fight.
Perez is no world beater but he has competed at a higher level than Campbells previous opponents. He also looked good in his last fight, just a shame he was fighting in front of blind judges.
Campbell UD, if he isn't planning to go for the British then at least this fight should help set up a Crolla fight
That is a bit of a joke! I don't recognise half of their top 15 either!Naandrew wrote:maverick23 wrote:He was ranked at light welterweight by the WBA at no.6 so it's no big surprise he's now ranked at lightweight considering he's a previous belt holder. Are you sure he's moved to number 1 at lightweight? I'd be surprised if that was the case. I'm pretty sure it's purely an eliminator for the no1 spot (which is now open following Petrov's loss).Naandrew wrote:Perez was not rated by the WBA last month then this months he returned to the rankings at number 1
Absolutely disgusting a pure and simple brown envelope job from Hearn.
Telling you now Paul Smith will be in those rankings at Super middle soon
Perez is no 1 have a look yourself. It's the WBA pure utter scum.
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wp-content/upl ... -march.pdf