AJ to fight PULEV next ? DECEMBER ? *
Posted: 03 Aug 2017, 09:14
*
Pulev has less than 0,001 % chance to win..........dickbelden wrote:*
ValMar wrote:Pulev has less than 0,001 % chance to win..........dickbelden wrote:*
I don't like this kind of way........Tony1244 wrote:ValMar wrote:Pulev has less than 0,001 % chance to win..........dickbelden wrote:*
That's the way the promoters like it nowadays.
ValMar wrote:I don't like this kind of way........Tony1244 wrote:ValMar wrote:
Pulev has less than 0,001 % chance to win..........
That's the way the promoters like it nowadays.
I prefer to see him against Tyson Fury, but......Tony1244 wrote:ValMar wrote:I don't like this kind of way........Tony1244 wrote:
That's the way the promoters like it nowadays.
It sucks. My picks for AJ would be Wilder, Ortiz, Parker, Ruiz in that order.
ValMar wrote:I prefer to see him against Tyson Fury, but......Tony1244 wrote:ValMar wrote:
I don't like this kind of way........
It sucks. My picks for AJ would be Wilder, Ortiz, Parker, Ruiz in that order.
I think the same.Tony1244 wrote:ValMar wrote:I prefer to see him against Tyson Fury, but......Tony1244 wrote:
It sucks. My picks for AJ would be Wilder, Ortiz, Parker, Ruiz in that order.
I'd be surprised if Fury came back.
ValMar wrote:Pulev has less than 0,001 % chance to win..........
Horse wrote:ValMar wrote:Pulev has less than 0,001 % chance to win..........
I agree. He's fucked.ValMar wrote:I think the same.Tony1244 wrote:ValMar wrote: I prefer to see him against Tyson Fury, but......
I'd be surprised if Fury came back.
Giving a HW boxer a 1% chance is folly. Even light punching HW can knock another HW out.Tony1244 wrote:Horse wrote:ValMar wrote:Pulev has less than 0,001 % chance to win..........
I'd give Pulev 1%. AJ would need a severe injury, and no that injury would not be from Pulev.
When has a top 10 ranked boxer ever only had a 1% chance against another top 10 ranked boxer?Loki wrote:Giving a HW boxer a 1% chance is folly. Even light punching HW can knock another HW out.
Pulev ability is pretty good but he does lack power and got it all wrong against Klitschko in 2014 (a different animal).
AJ should win, but I wouldn't bet my house on it.
pulev is rubbish. in the scheme of things it's not a bad fight. he'll get crushed though.Horse wrote:When has a top 10 ranked boxer ever only had a 1% chance against another top 10 ranked boxer?Loki wrote:Giving a HW boxer a 1% chance is folly. Even light punching HW can knock another HW out.
Pulev ability is pretty good but he does lack power and got it all wrong against Klitschko in 2014 (a different animal).
AJ should win, but I wouldn't bet my house on it.
It's ridiculous to write Pulev off as a no-hoper. He'd be Joshua's 2nd best win by some way compared to his 3rd best win.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if Pulev won. It would be a very good, world class win for Joshua.
Joshua might as well retire then.Riddick Blowe wrote:pulev is rubbish. in the scheme of things it's not a bad fight. he'll get crushed though.
Explain the way for Pulev's victory, please. How ?? Jab, jab, jab....against Joshua ...Clinching ? Long distance ? Trading punches ?.....No way, believe me, and I have a respect for Pulev....He ought to be happy with UD loss....Loki wrote:Giving a HW boxer a 1% chance is folly. Even light punching HW can knock another HW out.Tony1244 wrote:Horse wrote:
I'd give Pulev 1%. AJ would need a severe injury, and no that injury would not be from Pulev.
Pulev ability is pretty good but he does lack power and got it all wrong against Klitschko in 2014 (a different animal).
AJ should win, but I wouldn't bet my house on it.
Quite simple - he could outbox him. If Joshua comes in at 255lbs with piles of muscles, he WILL get tired.ValMar wrote:Explain the way for Pulev's victory, please. How ?? Jab, jab, jab....against Joshua ...Clinching ? Long distance ? Trading punches ?.....No way, believe me, and I have a respect for Pulev....He ought to be happy with UD loss....Loki wrote:Giving a HW boxer a 1% chance is folly. Even light punching HW can knock another HW out.Tony1244 wrote:
I'd give Pulev 1%. AJ would need a severe injury, and no that injury would not be from Pulev.
Pulev ability is pretty good but he does lack power and got it all wrong against Klitschko in 2014 (a different animal).
AJ should win, but I wouldn't bet my house on it.
Pulev is among top ten HWs nowadays, doubtless, he is capable to beat Parker, even Wilder, but against Joshua he can not do anything. Maybe he can win two or three rounds, and that is all. Joshua's punch power is on the same level as Klitschko's, and Pulev will not be able to avoid punches 12 rounds....And Pulev himself is not a powerful puncher, and his chin is no more than average. I hope he will be paid properly, and be retired as a wealthy gentleman.Loki wrote:Quite simple - he could outbox him. If Joshua comes in at 255lbs with piles of muscles, he WILL get tired.ValMar wrote:Explain the way for Pulev's victory, please. How ?? Jab, jab, jab....against Joshua ...Clinching ? Long distance ? Trading punches ?.....No way, believe me, and I have a respect for Pulev....He ought to be happy with UD loss....Loki wrote:
Giving a HW boxer a 1% chance is folly. Even light punching HW can knock another HW out.
Pulev ability is pretty good but he does lack power and got it all wrong against Klitschko in 2014 (a different animal).
AJ should win, but I wouldn't bet my house on it.
I fully expect AJ to KO Pulev, but it isn't a certainty. Forget Pulevs performance against Klitschko, that was foolish and the 2014 version of Klitschko is a lot better than AJ in 2017.
I just don't think Pulev has enough power to keep AJ honest and gunshy.
It's a match up I'm confident predicting crusader, if this isn't Joshua by stoppage I'd be surprised. It's no offence intended to those that think otherwise, in my view they are being optimistic.crusader wrote:IMO Wlad was less accurate and couldn't pull the trigger as quickly in his last years...natural things which start to happen when you're that old.
By the way, is this what we're in for now with AJ? People being called too optimistic just for suggesting that a win isn't guaranteed for him?