BoxRec

Horseback riding, glittery tshirts, shorts rolled way too far up his thighs, Oscar.

Just a thought

Who cares?

Just DM him if you want a piece faggot

Do you mean is he a batty man???! I don't think so. His promoter definitely is though

Gennady Gaycrusher Golovkin.

But I dont think so. Cotto, Brook yes, Canelo no. And Oscar isnt either. He is a lesbian.

OK?
He is a well groomed very rich heterosexual.

Welcome to the year 2017 on a boxing forum. OP, have you been in hibernation for the last 30 years?

This thread is a big reveal of your character.

Who gives a fcuk

Check out all the little pea brained outraged keyboard warriors

I'm posing a question, not judging him one way or the other.

I'm aware he has a gf and a baby but operating in the male dominated macho world of boxing and having been raised in a society not quite as liberal as ours perhaps he'd not want to admit it.

Simmer down girls

Nightmare Roy wrote:Who gives a fcuk

X2

Not a single fcuk given here.

Are you suppressing your gay side so much that you think about a man having sex with other men so much that you'd discuss it on a forum. I've never got people who actually cared, even one little bit, about if a man prefers to have sex with another man rather than a woman. You must clearly think about it... a lot

This thread says way more about Opie than Canelo.

BitPlayer wrote:This thread says way more about Opie than Canelo.

Agreed

danconnollyeire wrote:Are you suppressing your gay side so much that you think about a man having sex with other men so much that you'd discuss it on a forum. I've never got people who actually cared, even one little bit, about if a man prefers to have sex with another man rather than a woman. You must clearly think about it... a lot

Your inference is wholly misplaced. It doesn't necessarily follow that somebody posing a simple question on a forum thinks about the subject of that question quite a lot or indeed shares the same sexual proclivities of the person mentioned in the question. That's a very simplistic thought process.

Of course it would be interesting if one of the top boxers in the world was gay.

tobyh5 wrote:Welcome to the year 2017 on a boxing forum. OP, have you been in hibernation for the last 30 years?

This thread is a big reveal of your character.

danconnollyeire wrote:Are you suppressing your gay side so much that you think about a man having sex with other men so much that you'd discuss it on a forum. I've never got people who actually cared, even one little bit, about if a man prefers to have sex with another man rather than a woman. You must clearly think about it... a lot

What I dont get is why people care about people who care about man having sex with other man. If you truly are not interested then ignore it. It reveals some kind of mental block that wont let you be curious about those things yourself. You must be very insecure about your own sexuality.

Or more likely you are just another fascist who dont want others to discuss subject someone told you is bad.

Tarkus wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote:Are you suppressing your gay side so much that you think about a man having sex with other men so much that you'd discuss it on a forum. I've never got people who actually cared, even one little bit, about if a man prefers to have sex with another man rather than a woman. You must clearly think about it... a lot

What I dont get is why people care about people who care about man having sex with other man. If you truly are not interested then ignore it. It reveals some kind of mental block that wont let you be curious about those things yourself. You must be very insecure about your own sexuality.

Or more likely you are just another fascist who dont want others to discuss subject someone told you is bad.

Well you're so stupidly wrong, it's funny. I worked in a gay bar for 18 months, as you can imagine a lot of people discuss gay sex, of which I had no problems with. It was the obvious homophobic tone of the question (unless you're thick, you won't understand)

Also, I've literally been arrested for fighting fascists on marches. What the fvck you ever done apart from throw around the word?

Define fascist.
Is that someone who doesn't accept extreme left wing views?

Steve Hughes the Australian comedian said it best.
If Canelo is gay all it means he is even tougher than we thought.

"What do you mean gay guys aren't tough? They f**k men!"

Like all normal people, I couldn't care less if Alvarez is gay or straight, I just like to watch him boxing.

Forget it - I've looked it up.
Fascism is a form of government , which is a type of authoritarian dictatorship.

So fascists I assume, are not simply people who don't share left wing views. In fact those people might simply be - ordinary everyday citizens perhaps.

I'm sorry to bring this up on a boxing forum, but you've got to challenge these 'rent a demo' nutters when they appear.

Posters who say 'I don't care' 'it's not relevant' etc may be right from a sporting perspective, but socially it doesn't hold water.

We live in an era where the public is obsessed with slebs' lives and everything about them.

We're interested in who they are having sex with, how they behave, whether they get high and party, how they dress etc.

To suggest that no one is interested in whether Canelo is a batty man is nonsense. Tell me it's not relevant to know about Orlando Cruz's sexuality or Emile Griffith. Or tell me that it's not interesting that Oscar likes to wear women's underwear and sniff Charlie with hookers?

It's part of the interesting characters in boxing.

Ps is there any proof Canelo is batty, or is this just a random out of the blue thread?

danconnollyeire wrote: Well you're so stupidly wrong, it's funny. I worked in a gay bar for 18 months, as you can imagine a lot of people discuss gay sex, of which I had no problems with. It was the obvious homophobic tone of the question (unless you're thick, you won't understand)

Also, I've literally been arrested for fighting fascists on marches. What the fvck you ever done apart from throw around the word?

He's not wrong and he makes a good point. How can you call him thick when your points are so ill thought through and laced with your own bigotry.

The tone of the question wasn't homophobic dumbass, you just inferred homophobia because your tiny little brain has been influenced by the liberal media to perceive any discussion of minorities, in all but the most patronizing tones, as prejudice.

Tell me keyboard warrior how is it relevant that you're so ill disciplined that you fight with people who hold different opinions from your own in the street ? Was that meant to impress us

boxingknockout wrote:
Ps is there any proof Canelo is batty, or is this just a random out of the blue thread?

No proof, just an impression I've formed from literally nothing more than what I wrote in the original post.